Cargando…

Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning

Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antony, Rachitha, Lonski, Peta, Ungureanu, Elena, Hardcastle, Nicholas, Yeo, Adam, Siva, Shankar, Kron, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825
_version_ 1783507030420488192
author Antony, Rachitha
Lonski, Peta
Ungureanu, Elena
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Yeo, Adam
Siva, Shankar
Kron, Tomas
author_facet Antony, Rachitha
Lonski, Peta
Ungureanu, Elena
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Yeo, Adam
Siva, Shankar
Kron, Tomas
author_sort Antony, Rachitha
collection PubMed
description Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to treatment planning by medical physicists for 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment. Reviews were performed of 211 4DCT scans (193 patients) over a 3‐yr period (October 2014 to October 2017). Treatment sites included lung (n = 168), kidney/adrenal/adrenal gland (n = 12), rib (n = 4), mediastinum (n = 10), liver (n = 2), T‐spine (n = 1), and other abdominal sites (n = 14). It was found that in 23% (n = 49) of cases patient management was altered due to the review process. The most frequent intervention involved patient‐specific contouring advice (n = 35 cases, 17%) including adjustment of internal target volume (ITV) margins. In 13 cases (6%) a rescan was requested due to extensive motion artifact rendering the scan inadequate for SABR treatment planning. 4DCT review by medical physicists was found to be an effective method to improve plan quality for SABR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7075381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70753812020-03-17 Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning Antony, Rachitha Lonski, Peta Ungureanu, Elena Hardcastle, Nicholas Yeo, Adam Siva, Shankar Kron, Tomas J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to treatment planning by medical physicists for 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment. Reviews were performed of 211 4DCT scans (193 patients) over a 3‐yr period (October 2014 to October 2017). Treatment sites included lung (n = 168), kidney/adrenal/adrenal gland (n = 12), rib (n = 4), mediastinum (n = 10), liver (n = 2), T‐spine (n = 1), and other abdominal sites (n = 14). It was found that in 23% (n = 49) of cases patient management was altered due to the review process. The most frequent intervention involved patient‐specific contouring advice (n = 35 cases, 17%) including adjustment of internal target volume (ITV) margins. In 13 cases (6%) a rescan was requested due to extensive motion artifact rendering the scan inadequate for SABR treatment planning. 4DCT review by medical physicists was found to be an effective method to improve plan quality for SABR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7075381/ /pubmed/32053280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Antony, Rachitha
Lonski, Peta
Ungureanu, Elena
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Yeo, Adam
Siva, Shankar
Kron, Tomas
Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title_full Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title_fullStr Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title_short Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
title_sort independent review of 4dct scans used for sabr treatment planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825
work_keys_str_mv AT antonyrachitha independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT lonskipeta independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT ungureanuelena independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT hardcastlenicholas independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT yeoadam independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT sivashankar independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning
AT krontomas independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning