Cargando…
Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning
Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825 |
_version_ | 1783507030420488192 |
---|---|
author | Antony, Rachitha Lonski, Peta Ungureanu, Elena Hardcastle, Nicholas Yeo, Adam Siva, Shankar Kron, Tomas |
author_facet | Antony, Rachitha Lonski, Peta Ungureanu, Elena Hardcastle, Nicholas Yeo, Adam Siva, Shankar Kron, Tomas |
author_sort | Antony, Rachitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to treatment planning by medical physicists for 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment. Reviews were performed of 211 4DCT scans (193 patients) over a 3‐yr period (October 2014 to October 2017). Treatment sites included lung (n = 168), kidney/adrenal/adrenal gland (n = 12), rib (n = 4), mediastinum (n = 10), liver (n = 2), T‐spine (n = 1), and other abdominal sites (n = 14). It was found that in 23% (n = 49) of cases patient management was altered due to the review process. The most frequent intervention involved patient‐specific contouring advice (n = 35 cases, 17%) including adjustment of internal target volume (ITV) margins. In 13 cases (6%) a rescan was requested due to extensive motion artifact rendering the scan inadequate for SABR treatment planning. 4DCT review by medical physicists was found to be an effective method to improve plan quality for SABR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7075381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70753812020-03-17 Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning Antony, Rachitha Lonski, Peta Ungureanu, Elena Hardcastle, Nicholas Yeo, Adam Siva, Shankar Kron, Tomas J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Four‐dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) is required for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of mobile targets to account for tumor motion during treatment planning and delivery. In this study, we report on the impact of an image review quality assurance process performed prior to treatment planning by medical physicists for 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment. Reviews were performed of 211 4DCT scans (193 patients) over a 3‐yr period (October 2014 to October 2017). Treatment sites included lung (n = 168), kidney/adrenal/adrenal gland (n = 12), rib (n = 4), mediastinum (n = 10), liver (n = 2), T‐spine (n = 1), and other abdominal sites (n = 14). It was found that in 23% (n = 49) of cases patient management was altered due to the review process. The most frequent intervention involved patient‐specific contouring advice (n = 35 cases, 17%) including adjustment of internal target volume (ITV) margins. In 13 cases (6%) a rescan was requested due to extensive motion artifact rendering the scan inadequate for SABR treatment planning. 4DCT review by medical physicists was found to be an effective method to improve plan quality for SABR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7075381/ /pubmed/32053280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Antony, Rachitha Lonski, Peta Ungureanu, Elena Hardcastle, Nicholas Yeo, Adam Siva, Shankar Kron, Tomas Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title | Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title_full | Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title_fullStr | Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title_short | Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning |
title_sort | independent review of 4dct scans used for sabr treatment planning |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonyrachitha independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT lonskipeta independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT ungureanuelena independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT hardcastlenicholas independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT yeoadam independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT sivashankar independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning AT krontomas independentreviewof4dctscansusedforsabrtreatmentplanning |