Cargando…
Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809 |
_version_ | 1783507031109402624 |
---|---|
author | Shaikh, Mubin Y. Joiner, Michael C. Nalichowski, Adrian Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. Burmeister, Jay |
author_facet | Shaikh, Mubin Y. Joiner, Michael C. Nalichowski, Adrian Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. Burmeister, Jay |
author_sort | Shaikh, Mubin Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The normality of the XRS datasets was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test, the accuracy of the calibrated depth–dose curves (DDCs) was validated with ionization chamber measurements, and the shape of each DDC was evaluated using depth–dose ratios (DDRs). For 20 Gy prescribed to the spherical applicator surface, the dose was computed at 5‐mm and 10‐mm depths from the spherical applicator surface for all XRSs. RESULTS: At 5‐, 10‐, 20‐, and 30‐mm depths from the source, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the XRS output for 40 kVp was 4.4%, 2.8%, 2.0%, and 3.1% and for 50 kVp was 4.2%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. At a 20‐mm depth from the source, the 40‐kVp energy had a mean output in Gy/Minute = 0.36, standard deviation (SD) = 0.0072, minimum output = 0.34, and maximum output = 0.37 and a 50‐kVp energy had a mean output = 0.56, SD = 0.021, minimum output = 0.52, and maximum output = 0.60. We noted the maximum DRR values of 2.8% and 2.5% for 40 kVp and 50 kVp, respectively. For all XRSs, the maximum dosimetric effect of these variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface is ≤ 2.5%. The CV increased as depth increased and as applicator size decreased. CONCLUSION: The American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Group‐167 requires that the impurities in radionuclides used for brachytherapy produce ≤ 5.0% dosimetric variations. Because of differences in an XRS output and DDC, we have demonstrated the dosimetric variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface to be ≤ 2.5%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7075384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70753842020-03-17 Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source Shaikh, Mubin Y. Joiner, Michael C. Nalichowski, Adrian Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. Burmeister, Jay J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The normality of the XRS datasets was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test, the accuracy of the calibrated depth–dose curves (DDCs) was validated with ionization chamber measurements, and the shape of each DDC was evaluated using depth–dose ratios (DDRs). For 20 Gy prescribed to the spherical applicator surface, the dose was computed at 5‐mm and 10‐mm depths from the spherical applicator surface for all XRSs. RESULTS: At 5‐, 10‐, 20‐, and 30‐mm depths from the source, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the XRS output for 40 kVp was 4.4%, 2.8%, 2.0%, and 3.1% and for 50 kVp was 4.2%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. At a 20‐mm depth from the source, the 40‐kVp energy had a mean output in Gy/Minute = 0.36, standard deviation (SD) = 0.0072, minimum output = 0.34, and maximum output = 0.37 and a 50‐kVp energy had a mean output = 0.56, SD = 0.021, minimum output = 0.52, and maximum output = 0.60. We noted the maximum DRR values of 2.8% and 2.5% for 40 kVp and 50 kVp, respectively. For all XRSs, the maximum dosimetric effect of these variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface is ≤ 2.5%. The CV increased as depth increased and as applicator size decreased. CONCLUSION: The American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Group‐167 requires that the impurities in radionuclides used for brachytherapy produce ≤ 5.0% dosimetric variations. Because of differences in an XRS output and DDC, we have demonstrated the dosimetric variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface to be ≤ 2.5%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7075384/ /pubmed/31976605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Shaikh, Mubin Y. Joiner, Michael C. Nalichowski, Adrian Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. Burmeister, Jay Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title | Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title_full | Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title_short | Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source |
title_sort | evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the intrabeam x‐ray source |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaikhmubiny evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource AT joinermichaelc evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource AT nalichowskiadrian evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource AT kumaraswamylalithk evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource AT burmeisterjay evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource |