Cargando…

Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source

INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaikh, Mubin Y., Joiner, Michael C., Nalichowski, Adrian, Kumaraswamy, Lalith K., Burmeister, Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809
_version_ 1783507031109402624
author Shaikh, Mubin Y.
Joiner, Michael C.
Nalichowski, Adrian
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
Burmeister, Jay
author_facet Shaikh, Mubin Y.
Joiner, Michael C.
Nalichowski, Adrian
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
Burmeister, Jay
author_sort Shaikh, Mubin Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The normality of the XRS datasets was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test, the accuracy of the calibrated depth–dose curves (DDCs) was validated with ionization chamber measurements, and the shape of each DDC was evaluated using depth–dose ratios (DDRs). For 20 Gy prescribed to the spherical applicator surface, the dose was computed at 5‐mm and 10‐mm depths from the spherical applicator surface for all XRSs. RESULTS: At 5‐, 10‐, 20‐, and 30‐mm depths from the source, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the XRS output for 40 kVp was 4.4%, 2.8%, 2.0%, and 3.1% and for 50 kVp was 4.2%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. At a 20‐mm depth from the source, the 40‐kVp energy had a mean output in Gy/Minute = 0.36, standard deviation (SD) = 0.0072, minimum output = 0.34, and maximum output = 0.37 and a 50‐kVp energy had a mean output = 0.56, SD = 0.021, minimum output = 0.52, and maximum output = 0.60. We noted the maximum DRR values of 2.8% and 2.5% for 40 kVp and 50 kVp, respectively. For all XRSs, the maximum dosimetric effect of these variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface is ≤ 2.5%. The CV increased as depth increased and as applicator size decreased. CONCLUSION: The American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Group‐167 requires that the impurities in radionuclides used for brachytherapy produce ≤ 5.0% dosimetric variations. Because of differences in an XRS output and DDC, we have demonstrated the dosimetric variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface to be ≤ 2.5%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7075384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70753842020-03-17 Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source Shaikh, Mubin Y. Joiner, Michael C. Nalichowski, Adrian Kumaraswamy, Lalith K. Burmeister, Jay J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics INTRODUCTION: INTRABEAM x‐ray sources (XRSs) have distinct output characteristics due to subtle variations between the ideal and manufactured products. The objective of this study is to intercompare 15 XRSs and to dosimetrically quantify the impact of manufacturing variations on the delivered dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The normality of the XRS datasets was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test, the accuracy of the calibrated depth–dose curves (DDCs) was validated with ionization chamber measurements, and the shape of each DDC was evaluated using depth–dose ratios (DDRs). For 20 Gy prescribed to the spherical applicator surface, the dose was computed at 5‐mm and 10‐mm depths from the spherical applicator surface for all XRSs. RESULTS: At 5‐, 10‐, 20‐, and 30‐mm depths from the source, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the XRS output for 40 kVp was 4.4%, 2.8%, 2.0%, and 3.1% and for 50 kVp was 4.2%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. At a 20‐mm depth from the source, the 40‐kVp energy had a mean output in Gy/Minute = 0.36, standard deviation (SD) = 0.0072, minimum output = 0.34, and maximum output = 0.37 and a 50‐kVp energy had a mean output = 0.56, SD = 0.021, minimum output = 0.52, and maximum output = 0.60. We noted the maximum DRR values of 2.8% and 2.5% for 40 kVp and 50 kVp, respectively. For all XRSs, the maximum dosimetric effect of these variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface is ≤ 2.5%. The CV increased as depth increased and as applicator size decreased. CONCLUSION: The American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Group‐167 requires that the impurities in radionuclides used for brachytherapy produce ≤ 5.0% dosimetric variations. Because of differences in an XRS output and DDC, we have demonstrated the dosimetric variations within a 10‐mm depth of the applicator surface to be ≤ 2.5%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7075384/ /pubmed/31976605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Shaikh, Mubin Y.
Joiner, Michael C.
Nalichowski, Adrian
Kumaraswamy, Lalith K.
Burmeister, Jay
Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title_full Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title_fullStr Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title_short Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the INTRABEAM x‐ray source
title_sort evaluation of the dosimetric impact of manufacturing variations for the intrabeam x‐ray source
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12809
work_keys_str_mv AT shaikhmubiny evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource
AT joinermichaelc evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource
AT nalichowskiadrian evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource
AT kumaraswamylalithk evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource
AT burmeisterjay evaluationofthedosimetricimpactofmanufacturingvariationsfortheintrabeamxraysource