Cargando…
The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon
Life history theory examines how characteristics of organisms, such as age and size at maturity, may vary through natural selection as evolutionary responses that optimize fitness. Here we ask how predictions of age and size at maturity differ for the three classical fitness functions–intrinsic rate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228990 |
_version_ | 1783507061656518656 |
---|---|
author | Breck, James E. Simon, Carl P. Rutherford, Edward S. Low, Bobbi S. Lamberson, P. J. Rogers, Mark W. |
author_facet | Breck, James E. Simon, Carl P. Rutherford, Edward S. Low, Bobbi S. Lamberson, P. J. Rogers, Mark W. |
author_sort | Breck, James E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Life history theory examines how characteristics of organisms, such as age and size at maturity, may vary through natural selection as evolutionary responses that optimize fitness. Here we ask how predictions of age and size at maturity differ for the three classical fitness functions–intrinsic rate of natural increase r, net reproductive rate R(0), and reproductive value V(x)−for semelparous species. We show that different choices of fitness functions can lead to very different predictions of species behavior. In one’s efforts to understand an organism’s behavior and to develop effective conservation and management policies, the choice of fitness function matters. The central ingredient of our approach is the maturation reaction norm (MRN), which describes how optimal age and size at maturation vary with growth rate or mortality rate. We develop a practical geometric construction of MRNs that allows us to include different growth functions (linear growth and nonlinear von Bertalanffy growth in length) and develop two-dimensional MRNs useful for quantifying growth-mortality trade-offs. We relate our approach to Beverton-Holt life history invariants and to the Stearns-Koella categorization of MRNs. We conclude with a detailed discussion of life history parameters for Great Lakes Chinook Salmon and demonstrate that age and size at maturity are consistent with predictions using R(0) (but not r or V(x)) as the underlying fitness function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7075576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70755762020-03-23 The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon Breck, James E. Simon, Carl P. Rutherford, Edward S. Low, Bobbi S. Lamberson, P. J. Rogers, Mark W. PLoS One Research Article Life history theory examines how characteristics of organisms, such as age and size at maturity, may vary through natural selection as evolutionary responses that optimize fitness. Here we ask how predictions of age and size at maturity differ for the three classical fitness functions–intrinsic rate of natural increase r, net reproductive rate R(0), and reproductive value V(x)−for semelparous species. We show that different choices of fitness functions can lead to very different predictions of species behavior. In one’s efforts to understand an organism’s behavior and to develop effective conservation and management policies, the choice of fitness function matters. The central ingredient of our approach is the maturation reaction norm (MRN), which describes how optimal age and size at maturation vary with growth rate or mortality rate. We develop a practical geometric construction of MRNs that allows us to include different growth functions (linear growth and nonlinear von Bertalanffy growth in length) and develop two-dimensional MRNs useful for quantifying growth-mortality trade-offs. We relate our approach to Beverton-Holt life history invariants and to the Stearns-Koella categorization of MRNs. We conclude with a detailed discussion of life history parameters for Great Lakes Chinook Salmon and demonstrate that age and size at maturity are consistent with predictions using R(0) (but not r or V(x)) as the underlying fitness function. Public Library of Science 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7075576/ /pubmed/32176717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228990 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Breck, James E. Simon, Carl P. Rutherford, Edward S. Low, Bobbi S. Lamberson, P. J. Rogers, Mark W. The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title | The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title_full | The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title_fullStr | The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title_full_unstemmed | The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title_short | The geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for Great Lakes salmon |
title_sort | geometry of reaction norms yields insights on classical fitness functions for great lakes salmon |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breckjamese thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT simoncarlp thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT rutherfordedwards thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT lowbobbis thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT lambersonpj thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT rogersmarkw thegeometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT breckjamese geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT simoncarlp geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT rutherfordedwards geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT lowbobbis geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT lambersonpj geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon AT rogersmarkw geometryofreactionnormsyieldsinsightsonclassicalfitnessfunctionsforgreatlakessalmon |