Cargando…

The genealogical method in epistemology

In 1990 Edward Craig published a book called Knowledge and the State of Nature in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig’s book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusch, Martin, McKenna, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1675-1
_version_ 1783507097843924992
author Kusch, Martin
McKenna, Robin
author_facet Kusch, Martin
McKenna, Robin
author_sort Kusch, Martin
collection PubMed
description In 1990 Edward Craig published a book called Knowledge and the State of Nature in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig’s book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-realist metaepistemology, contextualism, relativism, anti-luck virtue epistemology, epistemic injustice, value of knowledge, pragmatism and virtue epistemology. While the number of objections to Craig’s approach has accumulated, there has been no sustained attempt to develop answers to these objections. In this paper we provide answers to seven important objections in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7075841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70758412020-03-23 The genealogical method in epistemology Kusch, Martin McKenna, Robin Synthese S.I.: PhilMethods In 1990 Edward Craig published a book called Knowledge and the State of Nature in which he introduced and defended a genealogical approach to epistemology. In recent years Craig’s book has attracted a lot of attention, and his distinctive approach has been put to a wide range of uses including anti-realist metaepistemology, contextualism, relativism, anti-luck virtue epistemology, epistemic injustice, value of knowledge, pragmatism and virtue epistemology. While the number of objections to Craig’s approach has accumulated, there has been no sustained attempt to develop answers to these objections. In this paper we provide answers to seven important objections in the literature. Springer Netherlands 2018-01-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7075841/ /pubmed/32214511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1675-1 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle S.I.: PhilMethods
Kusch, Martin
McKenna, Robin
The genealogical method in epistemology
title The genealogical method in epistemology
title_full The genealogical method in epistemology
title_fullStr The genealogical method in epistemology
title_full_unstemmed The genealogical method in epistemology
title_short The genealogical method in epistemology
title_sort genealogical method in epistemology
topic S.I.: PhilMethods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1675-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kuschmartin thegenealogicalmethodinepistemology
AT mckennarobin thegenealogicalmethodinepistemology
AT kuschmartin genealogicalmethodinepistemology
AT mckennarobin genealogicalmethodinepistemology