Cargando…

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies in outcome reporting (DOR) between protocol and published studies include inclusions of new outcomes, omission of prespecified outcomes, upgrade and downgrade of secondary and primary outcomes, and changes in definitions of prespecified outcomes. DOR can result in outcome r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shah, Kieran, Egan, Gregory, Huan, Lawrence (Nichoe), Kirkham, Jamie, Reid, Emma, Tejani, Aaron M
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:	Evidence Based Practice
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32184303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032497

Ejemplares similares

Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Brueton, V C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups
por: Reid, Emma K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
por: Cho, Yongil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
por: Elia, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessing the appropriateness of prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in Australia: a cross-sectional study
por: Hibbert, Peter D, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)
por: Downes, Martin J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Publication status of completed registered studies in paediatric appendicitis: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Breil, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey
por: Lafuente-Lafuente, Carmelo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016–2018: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Byrne, David, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reports
por: Jefferson, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Health facility structure and maternal characteristics related to essential newborn care in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
por: Menezes, Maria Alexsandra Silva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Coproduction in commissioning decisions: is there an association with decision satisfaction for commissioners working in the NHS? A cross-sectional survey 2010/2011
por: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Douet, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Healthcare professionals’ behavior, skills, knowledge and attitudes on evidence-based health practice: a protocol of cross-sectional study
por: Mariano, Arielly Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Adaptation of the DEMQOL-Proxy for routine use in care homes: a cross-sectional study of the reliability and validity of DEMQOL-CH
por: Hughes, Laura J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on the prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension: a cross-sectional analysis of 10 799 individuals
por: Alyabsi, Mesnad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Off-label indications of aspirin in gynaecology and obstetrics outpatients at two Chinese tertiary care hospitals: a retrospective cross-sectional study
por: Shen, Sijie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Failure to address potential bias in non-randomised controlled clinical trials may cause lack of evidence on patient-reported outcomes: a method study
por: Peinemann, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evidence-based practice utilisation and its associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals in West Shoa zone, central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
por: Megersa, Yohanis, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Answering medical questions at the point of care: a cross-sectional study comparing rapid decisions based on PubMed and Epistemonikos searches with evidence-based recommendations developed with the GRADE approach
por: Izcovich, Ariel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Utilisation of health management information and its determinant factors among health professionals working at public health facilities in North Wollo Zone, Northeast Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
por: Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prevalence of post-dialysis fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Dou, Junkai, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of levothyroxine therapy on obstetric, neonatal and childhood outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism diagnosed in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Yamamoto, Jennifer M, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A two-arm parallel-group individually randomised prison pilot study of a male remand alcohol intervention for self-efficacy enhancement: the APPRAISE study protocol
por: Holloway, Aisha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Diagnosing malignant melanoma in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical prediction rules
por: Harrington, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effective components of exercise and physical activity-related behaviour-change interventions for chronic non-communicable diseases in Africa: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with meta-analysis
por: Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso N, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
por: Hoffmann, Tammy C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma based on AGREE II and AGREE-REX: a systematic review protocol
por: He, Ling-Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews
por: Campbell, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
por: McCarter, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Guidelines: is bigger better? A review of SIGN guidelines
por: Baird, A Gordon, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
por: Yepes-Nuñez, Juan José, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Protocol for assessing the determinants of preoperative test-ordering behaviour for low-risk surgical procedures using a theoretically driven, qualitative design
por: Pike, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using theatre as an arts-based knowledge translation strategy for health-related information: a scoping review protocol
por: Hall, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol
por: Li, Guowei, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_d63eae51anifbrqc23dt6aturf