Cargando…

Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is used as an aid tool by radiologists on breast lesion diagnosis in ultrasonography. Previous studies demonstrated that CAD can improve the diagnosis performance of radiologists. However, the optimal use of CAD on breast lesions according to size (below or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yongping, Liang, Zhou, Ping, Juan, Zhang, Yongfeng, Zhao, Liu, Wengang, Shi, Yifan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16334
_version_ 1783507208860860416
author Yongping, Liang
Zhou, Ping
Juan, Zhang
Yongfeng, Zhao
Liu, Wengang
Shi, Yifan
author_facet Yongping, Liang
Zhou, Ping
Juan, Zhang
Yongfeng, Zhao
Liu, Wengang
Shi, Yifan
author_sort Yongping, Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is used as an aid tool by radiologists on breast lesion diagnosis in ultrasonography. Previous studies demonstrated that CAD can improve the diagnosis performance of radiologists. However, the optimal use of CAD on breast lesions according to size (below or above 2 cm) has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of different radiologists using CAD to detect breast tumors less and more than 2 cm in size. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 261 consecutive patients (mean age 43 years; age range 17-70 years), including 398 lesions (148 lesions>2 cm, 79 malignant and 69 benign; 250 lesions≤2 cm, 71 malignant and 179 benign) with breast mass as the prominent symptom. One novice radiologist with 1 year of ultrasonography experience and one experienced radiologist with 5 years of ultrasonography experience were each assigned to read the ultrasonography images without CAD, and then again at a second reading while applying the CAD S-Detect. We then compared the diagnostic performance of the readers in the two readings (without and combined with CAD) with breast imaging. The McNemar test for paired data was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For the novice reader, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) improved from 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) from the without-CAD mode to 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93; P<.001) at the combined-CAD mode in lesions≤2 cm. For the experienced reader, the AUC improved from 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94; P=.002). In lesions>2 cm, the AUC moderately decreased from 0.81 to 0.80 (novice reader) and from 0.90 to 0.82 (experienced reader). The sensitivity of the novice and experienced reader in lesions≤2 cm improved from 61.97% and 73.23% at the without-CAD mode to 90.14% and 97.18% (both P<.001) at the combined-CAD mode, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: S-Detect is a feasible diagnostic tool that can improve the sensitivity for both novice and experienced readers, while also improving the negative predictive value and AUC for lesions≤2 cm, demonstrating important application value in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800019649; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=33094
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7076404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70764042020-03-25 Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study Yongping, Liang Zhou, Ping Juan, Zhang Yongfeng, Zhao Liu, Wengang Shi, Yifan JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is used as an aid tool by radiologists on breast lesion diagnosis in ultrasonography. Previous studies demonstrated that CAD can improve the diagnosis performance of radiologists. However, the optimal use of CAD on breast lesions according to size (below or above 2 cm) has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of different radiologists using CAD to detect breast tumors less and more than 2 cm in size. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 261 consecutive patients (mean age 43 years; age range 17-70 years), including 398 lesions (148 lesions>2 cm, 79 malignant and 69 benign; 250 lesions≤2 cm, 71 malignant and 179 benign) with breast mass as the prominent symptom. One novice radiologist with 1 year of ultrasonography experience and one experienced radiologist with 5 years of ultrasonography experience were each assigned to read the ultrasonography images without CAD, and then again at a second reading while applying the CAD S-Detect. We then compared the diagnostic performance of the readers in the two readings (without and combined with CAD) with breast imaging. The McNemar test for paired data was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For the novice reader, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) improved from 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) from the without-CAD mode to 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93; P<.001) at the combined-CAD mode in lesions≤2 cm. For the experienced reader, the AUC improved from 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94; P=.002). In lesions>2 cm, the AUC moderately decreased from 0.81 to 0.80 (novice reader) and from 0.90 to 0.82 (experienced reader). The sensitivity of the novice and experienced reader in lesions≤2 cm improved from 61.97% and 73.23% at the without-CAD mode to 90.14% and 97.18% (both P<.001) at the combined-CAD mode, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: S-Detect is a feasible diagnostic tool that can improve the sensitivity for both novice and experienced readers, while also improving the negative predictive value and AUC for lesions≤2 cm, demonstrating important application value in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800019649; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=33094 JMIR Publications 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7076404/ /pubmed/32130149 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16334 Text en ©Liang Yongping, Ping Zhou, Zhang Juan, Zhao Yongfeng, Wengang Liu, Yifan Shi. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 02.03.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Yongping, Liang
Zhou, Ping
Juan, Zhang
Yongfeng, Zhao
Liu, Wengang
Shi, Yifan
Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title_full Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title_short Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study
title_sort performance of computer-aided diagnosis in ultrasonography for detection of breast lesions less and more than 2 cm: prospective comparative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16334
work_keys_str_mv AT yongpingliang performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy
AT zhouping performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy
AT juanzhang performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy
AT yongfengzhao performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy
AT liuwengang performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy
AT shiyifan performanceofcomputeraideddiagnosisinultrasonographyfordetectionofbreastlesionslessandmorethan2cmprospectivecomparativestudy