Cargando…
Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: Posterior cervical interfacet cages are an alternative to lateral mass fixation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Recently, a percutaneous, tissue-sparing system for interfacet cage placement has been developed, however, there is limited clin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32206522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219837145 |
_version_ | 1783507248666902528 |
---|---|
author | Laratta, Joseph L. Gupta, Karishma Smith, William D. |
author_facet | Laratta, Joseph L. Gupta, Karishma Smith, William D. |
author_sort | Laratta, Joseph L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: Posterior cervical interfacet cages are an alternative to lateral mass fixation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Recently, a percutaneous, tissue-sparing system for interfacet cage placement has been developed, however, there is limited clinical evidence supporting its widespread use. The aim was to review studies published on this system for patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications. METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE) were queried for original published studies that evaluated the percutaneous, tissue-sparing technique for posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cage placement. All studies reporting on open techniques and purely biomechanical studies were excluded. RESULTS: The extensive literature search returned 7852 studies. After systematic review, a total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were independently classified as retrospective or prospective cohort studies and each assessed by the GRADE criteria. Patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications were extracted from each study and presented. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue-sparing, posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages may be considered a safe and effective surgical intervention in patients failing conservative management for cervical spondylotic disease. However, the quality of evidence in the literature is lacking, and controlled, comparative studies are needed for definitive assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7076592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70765922020-03-23 Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature Laratta, Joseph L. Gupta, Karishma Smith, William D. Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: Posterior cervical interfacet cages are an alternative to lateral mass fixation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Recently, a percutaneous, tissue-sparing system for interfacet cage placement has been developed, however, there is limited clinical evidence supporting its widespread use. The aim was to review studies published on this system for patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications. METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE) were queried for original published studies that evaluated the percutaneous, tissue-sparing technique for posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cage placement. All studies reporting on open techniques and purely biomechanical studies were excluded. RESULTS: The extensive literature search returned 7852 studies. After systematic review, a total of 7 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were independently classified as retrospective or prospective cohort studies and each assessed by the GRADE criteria. Patient reported outcomes, radiographic outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, and complications were extracted from each study and presented. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue-sparing, posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages may be considered a safe and effective surgical intervention in patients failing conservative management for cervical spondylotic disease. However, the quality of evidence in the literature is lacking, and controlled, comparative studies are needed for definitive assessment. SAGE Publications 2019-03-25 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7076592/ /pubmed/32206522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219837145 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Laratta, Joseph L. Gupta, Karishma Smith, William D. Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title | Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full | Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_short | Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion With Interfacet Cages: A Systematic Review of the Literature |
title_sort | tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32206522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219837145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larattajosephl tissuesparingposteriorcervicalfusionwithinterfacetcagesasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT guptakarishma tissuesparingposteriorcervicalfusionwithinterfacetcagesasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT smithwilliamd tissuesparingposteriorcervicalfusionwithinterfacetcagesasystematicreviewoftheliterature |