Cargando…

The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering

BACKGROUND: The health of honeybee colonies is critical for bee products and agricultural production, and colony health is closely associated with the bacteria in the guts of honeybees. Although colony loss in winter is now the primary restriction in beekeeping, the effects of different sugars as wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongfang, Liu, Chunlei, Liu, Zhenguo, Wang, Ying, Ma, Lanting, Xu, Baohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01726-6
_version_ 1783507327882625024
author Wang, Hongfang
Liu, Chunlei
Liu, Zhenguo
Wang, Ying
Ma, Lanting
Xu, Baohua
author_facet Wang, Hongfang
Liu, Chunlei
Liu, Zhenguo
Wang, Ying
Ma, Lanting
Xu, Baohua
author_sort Wang, Hongfang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The health of honeybee colonies is critical for bee products and agricultural production, and colony health is closely associated with the bacteria in the guts of honeybees. Although colony loss in winter is now the primary restriction in beekeeping, the effects of different sugars as winter food on the health of honeybee colonies are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, the influence of different sugar diets on honeybee gut bacteria during overwintering was examined. RESULTS: The bacterial communities in honeybee midguts and hindguts before winter and after bees were fed honey, sucrose, and high-fructose syrup as winter-food were determined by targeting the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The dominant microbiota in honeybee guts were the phyla Proteobacteria (63.17%), Firmicutes (17.61%; Lactobacillus, 15.91%), Actinobacteria (4.06%; Bifidobacterium, 3.34%), and Bacteroidetes (1.72%). The dominant taxa were conserved and not affected by season, type of overwintering sugar, or spatial position in the gut. However, the relative abundance of the dominant taxa was affected by those factors. In the midgut, microbial diversity of the sucrose group was higher than that of the honey and high-fructose syrup groups, but in the hindgut, microbial diversity of the honey and high-fructose groups was higher than that in the sucrose group. Sucrose increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (Bifidobacteriales Bifidobacteriaceae) and Alphaproteobacteria (Rhizobiales and Mitochondria) of honeybee midgut, and honey enriched the Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria (Pasteurellales) in honeybee hindgut. High-fructose syrup increased the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria (Neisseriales: Neisseriaceae) of the midgut. CONCLUSION: The type of sugar used as winter food affected the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial communities in honeybee guts, not the taxa, which could affect the health and safety of honeybee colonies during overwintering. The presence of the supernal Alphaproteobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, and Lactobacillaceae in the gut of honeybees fed sucrose and cheaper than honey both indicate that sucrose is very suitable as the overwintering food for honeybees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7076957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70769572020-03-18 The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering Wang, Hongfang Liu, Chunlei Liu, Zhenguo Wang, Ying Ma, Lanting Xu, Baohua BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The health of honeybee colonies is critical for bee products and agricultural production, and colony health is closely associated with the bacteria in the guts of honeybees. Although colony loss in winter is now the primary restriction in beekeeping, the effects of different sugars as winter food on the health of honeybee colonies are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, the influence of different sugar diets on honeybee gut bacteria during overwintering was examined. RESULTS: The bacterial communities in honeybee midguts and hindguts before winter and after bees were fed honey, sucrose, and high-fructose syrup as winter-food were determined by targeting the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The dominant microbiota in honeybee guts were the phyla Proteobacteria (63.17%), Firmicutes (17.61%; Lactobacillus, 15.91%), Actinobacteria (4.06%; Bifidobacterium, 3.34%), and Bacteroidetes (1.72%). The dominant taxa were conserved and not affected by season, type of overwintering sugar, or spatial position in the gut. However, the relative abundance of the dominant taxa was affected by those factors. In the midgut, microbial diversity of the sucrose group was higher than that of the honey and high-fructose syrup groups, but in the hindgut, microbial diversity of the honey and high-fructose groups was higher than that in the sucrose group. Sucrose increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria (Bifidobacteriales Bifidobacteriaceae) and Alphaproteobacteria (Rhizobiales and Mitochondria) of honeybee midgut, and honey enriched the Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria (Pasteurellales) in honeybee hindgut. High-fructose syrup increased the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria (Neisseriales: Neisseriaceae) of the midgut. CONCLUSION: The type of sugar used as winter food affected the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial communities in honeybee guts, not the taxa, which could affect the health and safety of honeybee colonies during overwintering. The presence of the supernal Alphaproteobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, and Lactobacillaceae in the gut of honeybees fed sucrose and cheaper than honey both indicate that sucrose is very suitable as the overwintering food for honeybees. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7076957/ /pubmed/32183692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01726-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Hongfang
Liu, Chunlei
Liu, Zhenguo
Wang, Ying
Ma, Lanting
Xu, Baohua
The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title_full The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title_fullStr The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title_full_unstemmed The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title_short The different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
title_sort different dietary sugars modulate the composition of the gut microbiota in honeybee during overwintering
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01726-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongfang thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT liuchunlei thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT liuzhenguo thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT wangying thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT malanting thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT xubaohua thedifferentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT wanghongfang differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT liuchunlei differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT liuzhenguo differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT wangying differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT malanting differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering
AT xubaohua differentdietarysugarsmodulatethecompositionofthegutmicrobiotainhoneybeeduringoverwintering