Cargando…
Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes
The International Consensus in Time in Range (TIR) was recently released and defined the concept of the time spent in the target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL while reducing time in hypoglycemia, for patients using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). TIR was validated as an outcome measures for cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00529-z |
_version_ | 1783507333214633984 |
---|---|
author | Gabbay, Monica Andrade Lima Rodacki, Melanie Calliari, Luis Eduardo Vianna, Andre Gustavo Daher Krakauer, Marcio Pinto, Mauro Scharf Reis, Janice Sepúlveda Puñales, Marcia Miranda, Leonardo Garcia Ramalho, Ana Claudia Franco, Denise Reis Pedrosa, Hermelinda Pedrosa Cordeiro |
author_facet | Gabbay, Monica Andrade Lima Rodacki, Melanie Calliari, Luis Eduardo Vianna, Andre Gustavo Daher Krakauer, Marcio Pinto, Mauro Scharf Reis, Janice Sepúlveda Puñales, Marcia Miranda, Leonardo Garcia Ramalho, Ana Claudia Franco, Denise Reis Pedrosa, Hermelinda Pedrosa Cordeiro |
author_sort | Gabbay, Monica Andrade Lima |
collection | PubMed |
description | The International Consensus in Time in Range (TIR) was recently released and defined the concept of the time spent in the target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL while reducing time in hypoglycemia, for patients using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). TIR was validated as an outcome measures for clinical Trials complementing other components of glycemic control like Blood glucose and HbA1c. The challenge is to implement this practice more widely in countries with a limited health public and private budget as it occurs in Brazil. Could CGM be used intermittently? Could self-monitoring blood glucose obtained at different times of the day, with the amount of data high enough be used? More studies should be done, especially cost-effective studies to help understand the possibility of having sensors and include TIR evaluation in clinical practice nationwide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7076978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70769782020-03-18 Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes Gabbay, Monica Andrade Lima Rodacki, Melanie Calliari, Luis Eduardo Vianna, Andre Gustavo Daher Krakauer, Marcio Pinto, Mauro Scharf Reis, Janice Sepúlveda Puñales, Marcia Miranda, Leonardo Garcia Ramalho, Ana Claudia Franco, Denise Reis Pedrosa, Hermelinda Pedrosa Cordeiro Diabetol Metab Syndr Review The International Consensus in Time in Range (TIR) was recently released and defined the concept of the time spent in the target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL while reducing time in hypoglycemia, for patients using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). TIR was validated as an outcome measures for clinical Trials complementing other components of glycemic control like Blood glucose and HbA1c. The challenge is to implement this practice more widely in countries with a limited health public and private budget as it occurs in Brazil. Could CGM be used intermittently? Could self-monitoring blood glucose obtained at different times of the day, with the amount of data high enough be used? More studies should be done, especially cost-effective studies to help understand the possibility of having sensors and include TIR evaluation in clinical practice nationwide. BioMed Central 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7076978/ /pubmed/32190124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00529-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Gabbay, Monica Andrade Lima Rodacki, Melanie Calliari, Luis Eduardo Vianna, Andre Gustavo Daher Krakauer, Marcio Pinto, Mauro Scharf Reis, Janice Sepúlveda Puñales, Marcia Miranda, Leonardo Garcia Ramalho, Ana Claudia Franco, Denise Reis Pedrosa, Hermelinda Pedrosa Cordeiro Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title | Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title_full | Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title_fullStr | Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title_short | Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
title_sort | time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00529-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabbaymonicaandradelima timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT rodackimelanie timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT calliariluiseduardo timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT viannaandregustavodaher timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT krakauermarcio timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT pintomauroscharf timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT reisjanicesepulveda timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT punalesmarcia timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT mirandaleonardogarcia timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT ramalhoanaclaudia timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT francodenisereis timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes AT pedrosahermelindapedrosacordeiro timeinrangeanewparametertoevaluatebloodglucosecontrolinpatientswithdiabetes |