Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is usually caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. The prognosis is expected to be good in most patients, but there is limited scientific evidence on the indications for nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taso, Mirad, Sommernes, Jon Håvard, Kolstad, Frode, Sundseth, Jarle, Bjorland, Siri, Pripp, Are Hugo, Zwart, John Anker, Brox, Jens Ivar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3188-6
_version_ 1783507337033547776
author Taso, Mirad
Sommernes, Jon Håvard
Kolstad, Frode
Sundseth, Jarle
Bjorland, Siri
Pripp, Are Hugo
Zwart, John Anker
Brox, Jens Ivar
author_facet Taso, Mirad
Sommernes, Jon Håvard
Kolstad, Frode
Sundseth, Jarle
Bjorland, Siri
Pripp, Are Hugo
Zwart, John Anker
Brox, Jens Ivar
author_sort Taso, Mirad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is usually caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. The prognosis is expected to be good in most patients, but there is limited scientific evidence on the indications for nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in two trials – including disc herniation and spondylosis, respectively, and to evaluate factors that contribute to better decision making. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with disabling radicular arm pain and MRI-proven cervical disc herniation or spondylosis will be randomised to receive nonsurgical or surgical treatment. The follow-up period is one year and the sample size is estimated to be 50 for each arm in the two trials, giving a total of 200 patients. The primary outcomes are the Neck Disability Index and arm pain. Secondary outcomes include neck pain; EQ-5D and costs to evaluate cost-effectiveness; prognostic factors; CT and MRI scans, to estimate intervertebral foraminal area and nerve root compression; and the expected minimal improvement for willingness to undergo treatment. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study will contribute to better decision making in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03674619, on September 17, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7076994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70769942020-03-18 A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy Taso, Mirad Sommernes, Jon Håvard Kolstad, Frode Sundseth, Jarle Bjorland, Siri Pripp, Are Hugo Zwart, John Anker Brox, Jens Ivar BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is usually caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. The prognosis is expected to be good in most patients, but there is limited scientific evidence on the indications for nonsurgical and surgical treatments. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in two trials – including disc herniation and spondylosis, respectively, and to evaluate factors that contribute to better decision making. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with disabling radicular arm pain and MRI-proven cervical disc herniation or spondylosis will be randomised to receive nonsurgical or surgical treatment. The follow-up period is one year and the sample size is estimated to be 50 for each arm in the two trials, giving a total of 200 patients. The primary outcomes are the Neck Disability Index and arm pain. Secondary outcomes include neck pain; EQ-5D and costs to evaluate cost-effectiveness; prognostic factors; CT and MRI scans, to estimate intervertebral foraminal area and nerve root compression; and the expected minimal improvement for willingness to undergo treatment. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study will contribute to better decision making in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03674619, on September 17, 2018. BioMed Central 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7076994/ /pubmed/32178655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3188-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Taso, Mirad
Sommernes, Jon Håvard
Kolstad, Frode
Sundseth, Jarle
Bjorland, Siri
Pripp, Are Hugo
Zwart, John Anker
Brox, Jens Ivar
A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title_full A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title_short A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
title_sort randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3188-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tasomirad arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT sommernesjonhavard arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT kolstadfrode arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT sundsethjarle arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT bjorlandsiri arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT pripparehugo arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT zwartjohnanker arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT broxjensivar arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT tasomirad randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT sommernesjonhavard randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT kolstadfrode randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT sundsethjarle randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT bjorlandsiri randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT pripparehugo randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT zwartjohnanker randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy
AT broxjensivar randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessofsurgicalandnonsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathy