Cargando…

IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of digital health interventions to improve the delivery of psychoeducation to people with mental health problems and their relatives, and substantial investment in their development, there is little evidence of successful implementation into clinical practice. We re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobban, Fiona, Appelbe, Duncan, Appleton, Victoria, Billsborough, Julie, Fisher, Naomi Ruth, Foster, Sheena, Gill, Bethany, Glentworth, David, Harrop, Chris, Johnson, Sonia, Jones, Steven H., Kovacs, Tibor Zoltan, Lewis, Elizabeth, Mezes, Barbara, Morton, Charlotte, Murray, Elizabeth, O’Hanlon, Puffin, Pinfold, Vanessa, Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Siddle, Ronald, Smith, Jo, Sutton, Chris J., Viglienghi, Pietro, Walker, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5002-4
_version_ 1783507338474291200
author Lobban, Fiona
Appelbe, Duncan
Appleton, Victoria
Billsborough, Julie
Fisher, Naomi Ruth
Foster, Sheena
Gill, Bethany
Glentworth, David
Harrop, Chris
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Kovacs, Tibor Zoltan
Lewis, Elizabeth
Mezes, Barbara
Morton, Charlotte
Murray, Elizabeth
O’Hanlon, Puffin
Pinfold, Vanessa
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Siddle, Ronald
Smith, Jo
Sutton, Chris J.
Viglienghi, Pietro
Walker, Andrew
author_facet Lobban, Fiona
Appelbe, Duncan
Appleton, Victoria
Billsborough, Julie
Fisher, Naomi Ruth
Foster, Sheena
Gill, Bethany
Glentworth, David
Harrop, Chris
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Kovacs, Tibor Zoltan
Lewis, Elizabeth
Mezes, Barbara
Morton, Charlotte
Murray, Elizabeth
O’Hanlon, Puffin
Pinfold, Vanessa
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Siddle, Ronald
Smith, Jo
Sutton, Chris J.
Viglienghi, Pietro
Walker, Andrew
author_sort Lobban, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of digital health interventions to improve the delivery of psychoeducation to people with mental health problems and their relatives, and substantial investment in their development, there is little evidence of successful implementation into clinical practice. We report the first implementation study of a digital health intervention: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT), into routine mental healthcare. Our main aim was to identify critical factors affecting staff uptake and use of this online self-management tool for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar. METHODS: A mixed-methods, theory-driven (Normalisation Process Theory), iterative multiple case study approach using qualitative analysis of interviews with staff and quantitative reporting of uptake. Carer researchers were part of the research team. RESULTS: In all, 281 staff and 159 relatives from Early Intervention teams across six catchment areas (cases) in England registered on REACT; 129 staff took part in qualitative interviews. Staff were positive about REACT helping services improve support and meet clinical targets. Implementation was hindered by: high staff caseloads and difficulties prioritising carers; perception of REACT implementation as research; technical difficulties using REACT; poor interoperability with trust computer systems and care pathways; lack of access to mobile technology and training; restricted forum populations; staff fears of risk, online trolling, and replacement by technology; and uncertainty around REACT’s long-term availability. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health interventions, such as REACT, should be iteratively developed, evaluated, adapted and implemented, in partnership with the services they aim to support, and as part of a long term national strategy to co-develop integrated technology-enabled mental healthcare. Implementation strategies must instil a sense of ownership for staff and ensure they have adequate IT training, appropriate governance protocols for online working, and adequate mobile technologies. Wider contextual factors including adequate funding for mental health services and prioritisation of carer support, also need to be addressed for successful implementation of carer focussed digital interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registration: ISCTRN 16267685.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7077000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70770002020-03-18 IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use Lobban, Fiona Appelbe, Duncan Appleton, Victoria Billsborough, Julie Fisher, Naomi Ruth Foster, Sheena Gill, Bethany Glentworth, David Harrop, Chris Johnson, Sonia Jones, Steven H. Kovacs, Tibor Zoltan Lewis, Elizabeth Mezes, Barbara Morton, Charlotte Murray, Elizabeth O’Hanlon, Puffin Pinfold, Vanessa Rycroft-Malone, Jo Siddle, Ronald Smith, Jo Sutton, Chris J. Viglienghi, Pietro Walker, Andrew BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of digital health interventions to improve the delivery of psychoeducation to people with mental health problems and their relatives, and substantial investment in their development, there is little evidence of successful implementation into clinical practice. We report the first implementation study of a digital health intervention: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT), into routine mental healthcare. Our main aim was to identify critical factors affecting staff uptake and use of this online self-management tool for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar. METHODS: A mixed-methods, theory-driven (Normalisation Process Theory), iterative multiple case study approach using qualitative analysis of interviews with staff and quantitative reporting of uptake. Carer researchers were part of the research team. RESULTS: In all, 281 staff and 159 relatives from Early Intervention teams across six catchment areas (cases) in England registered on REACT; 129 staff took part in qualitative interviews. Staff were positive about REACT helping services improve support and meet clinical targets. Implementation was hindered by: high staff caseloads and difficulties prioritising carers; perception of REACT implementation as research; technical difficulties using REACT; poor interoperability with trust computer systems and care pathways; lack of access to mobile technology and training; restricted forum populations; staff fears of risk, online trolling, and replacement by technology; and uncertainty around REACT’s long-term availability. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health interventions, such as REACT, should be iteratively developed, evaluated, adapted and implemented, in partnership with the services they aim to support, and as part of a long term national strategy to co-develop integrated technology-enabled mental healthcare. Implementation strategies must instil a sense of ownership for staff and ensure they have adequate IT training, appropriate governance protocols for online working, and adequate mobile technologies. Wider contextual factors including adequate funding for mental health services and prioritisation of carer support, also need to be addressed for successful implementation of carer focussed digital interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registration: ISCTRN 16267685. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7077000/ /pubmed/32183787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5002-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lobban, Fiona
Appelbe, Duncan
Appleton, Victoria
Billsborough, Julie
Fisher, Naomi Ruth
Foster, Sheena
Gill, Bethany
Glentworth, David
Harrop, Chris
Johnson, Sonia
Jones, Steven H.
Kovacs, Tibor Zoltan
Lewis, Elizabeth
Mezes, Barbara
Morton, Charlotte
Murray, Elizabeth
O’Hanlon, Puffin
Pinfold, Vanessa
Rycroft-Malone, Jo
Siddle, Ronald
Smith, Jo
Sutton, Chris J.
Viglienghi, Pietro
Walker, Andrew
IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title_full IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title_fullStr IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title_full_unstemmed IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title_short IMPlementation of An online Relatives’ Toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (IMPART study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
title_sort implementation of an online relatives’ toolkit for psychosis or bipolar (impart study): iterative multiple case study to identify key factors impacting on staff uptake and use
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5002-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbanfiona implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT appelbeduncan implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT appletonvictoria implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT billsboroughjulie implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT fishernaomiruth implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT fostersheena implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT gillbethany implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT glentworthdavid implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT harropchris implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT johnsonsonia implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT jonesstevenh implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT kovacstiborzoltan implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT lewiselizabeth implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT mezesbarbara implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT mortoncharlotte implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT murrayelizabeth implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT ohanlonpuffin implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT pinfoldvanessa implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT rycroftmalonejo implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT siddleronald implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT smithjo implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT suttonchrisj implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT viglienghipietro implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse
AT walkerandrew implementationofanonlinerelativestoolkitforpsychosisorbipolarimpartstudyiterativemultiplecasestudytoidentifykeyfactorsimpactingonstaffuptakeanduse