Cargando…
Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria
OBJECTIVE: Probiotics are fed to improve enteric health, and they may also affect respiratory immunity through their exposure to the upper respiratory tract upon ingestion. However, their effect on the respiratory system is not known. Our aim was to determine how probiotics affect functions and mark...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4921-9 |
_version_ | 1783507344907304960 |
---|---|
author | Eicher, Susan D. Chitko-McKown, Carol G. Bryan, Keith A. |
author_facet | Eicher, Susan D. Chitko-McKown, Carol G. Bryan, Keith A. |
author_sort | Eicher, Susan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Probiotics are fed to improve enteric health, and they may also affect respiratory immunity through their exposure to the upper respiratory tract upon ingestion. However, their effect on the respiratory system is not known. Our aim was to determine how probiotics affect functions and markers of bronchoalveolar lung lavage cells (BAL) isolated from lungs of calves at slaughter. RESULTS: Treatments consisted of ten probiotic species and one control treatment. Probiotics and BAL were incubated 1:1 for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO(2). The cell surface markers measured included CD14, CD205, and CD18, and E. coli bioparticles were used to measure phagocytosis and oxidative burst. Differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and were noted for percent cells fluorescing and mean fluorescence intensity for CD14 and CD205. Additionally, oxidative burst was different as measured by both percentage of cells fluorescing and mean fluorescence intensity, and phagocytosis differed among species as measured by mean fluorescence intensity. Overall, probiotic species differed in their ability to suppress or increase leukocyte function showing that probiotic bacteria differentially modulate BAL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7077026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70770262020-03-19 Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria Eicher, Susan D. Chitko-McKown, Carol G. Bryan, Keith A. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Probiotics are fed to improve enteric health, and they may also affect respiratory immunity through their exposure to the upper respiratory tract upon ingestion. However, their effect on the respiratory system is not known. Our aim was to determine how probiotics affect functions and markers of bronchoalveolar lung lavage cells (BAL) isolated from lungs of calves at slaughter. RESULTS: Treatments consisted of ten probiotic species and one control treatment. Probiotics and BAL were incubated 1:1 for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO(2). The cell surface markers measured included CD14, CD205, and CD18, and E. coli bioparticles were used to measure phagocytosis and oxidative burst. Differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and were noted for percent cells fluorescing and mean fluorescence intensity for CD14 and CD205. Additionally, oxidative burst was different as measured by both percentage of cells fluorescing and mean fluorescence intensity, and phagocytosis differed among species as measured by mean fluorescence intensity. Overall, probiotic species differed in their ability to suppress or increase leukocyte function showing that probiotic bacteria differentially modulate BAL. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7077026/ /pubmed/32178719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4921-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Eicher, Susan D. Chitko-McKown, Carol G. Bryan, Keith A. Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title | Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title_full | Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title_fullStr | Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title_short | Variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
title_sort | variation in the response of bovine alveolar lavage cells to diverse species of probiotic bacteria |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4921-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eichersusand variationintheresponseofbovinealveolarlavagecellstodiversespeciesofprobioticbacteria AT chitkomckowncarolg variationintheresponseofbovinealveolarlavagecellstodiversespeciesofprobioticbacteria AT bryankeitha variationintheresponseofbovinealveolarlavagecellstodiversespeciesofprobioticbacteria |