Cargando…
Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better?
BACKGROUND: A consensus has been reached that carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) screening in immunosuppressed individuals can reduce the incidence of CRE bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical data of 395 consecutive HSCT patients from September 201...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0706-0 |
_version_ | 1783507360077053952 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Ting-Ting Luo, Xue-Ping Yang, Qing Chen, Hong-Chao Luo, Yi Zhao, Yan-Min Ye, Yi-Shan Lai, Xiao-Yu Yu, Jian Tan, Ya-Min Wei, Guo-Qing Huang, He Shi, Ji-Min |
author_facet | Yang, Ting-Ting Luo, Xue-Ping Yang, Qing Chen, Hong-Chao Luo, Yi Zhao, Yan-Min Ye, Yi-Shan Lai, Xiao-Yu Yu, Jian Tan, Ya-Min Wei, Guo-Qing Huang, He Shi, Ji-Min |
author_sort | Yang, Ting-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A consensus has been reached that carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) screening in immunosuppressed individuals can reduce the incidence of CRE bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical data of 395 consecutive HSCT patients from September 2017 to April 2019. From September 2017 to June 2018 (period 1), 200 patients received single CRE screening before transplantation. From July 2018 to April 2019 (period 2), 195 patients received continuous weekly CRE screening after admission. For patients colonized with CRE, targeted managements were received: (1) contact precautions and (2) preemptive CRE-targeted treatment if necessary. RESULTS: During period 1, 3 patients with CRE colonization were detected (1.5%). The CRE BSI rate was 2.0% (4 patients), and the related 30-day mortality was 50.0% (2 out of 4 patients). During period 2, 21 patients with CRE colonization were detected, and the detection rate was significantly higher than that in period 1 (P < 0.001). Of the 21 colonized patients, 4 (19.0%) patients were identified as positive for CRE at the first screening, 5 (23.8%) were identified at the second screening, and the remaining 12 (57.1%) were identified at the third or later screening. The CRE BSI rate decreased to 0.5% (1/195), and there were no CRE-related death. Fifteen colonized patients developed neutropenic fever. Thirteen colonizers were preemptively treated with tigecycline within 24 h of fever onset, and they achieved rapid temperature control. One colonizer received tigecycline later than 48 h after fever onset and ultimately survived due to the addition of polymyxin. The other received tigecycline later than 72 h after fever onset and died of septic shock. CONCLUSION: The increase in screening frequency contributed to the detection of patients with CRE colonization. Targeted managements for these colonized patients may contribute to reducing the incidence and mortality of CRE BSI, therefore improving the prognosis of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7077122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70771222020-03-19 Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? Yang, Ting-Ting Luo, Xue-Ping Yang, Qing Chen, Hong-Chao Luo, Yi Zhao, Yan-Min Ye, Yi-Shan Lai, Xiao-Yu Yu, Jian Tan, Ya-Min Wei, Guo-Qing Huang, He Shi, Ji-Min Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: A consensus has been reached that carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) screening in immunosuppressed individuals can reduce the incidence of CRE bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical data of 395 consecutive HSCT patients from September 2017 to April 2019. From September 2017 to June 2018 (period 1), 200 patients received single CRE screening before transplantation. From July 2018 to April 2019 (period 2), 195 patients received continuous weekly CRE screening after admission. For patients colonized with CRE, targeted managements were received: (1) contact precautions and (2) preemptive CRE-targeted treatment if necessary. RESULTS: During period 1, 3 patients with CRE colonization were detected (1.5%). The CRE BSI rate was 2.0% (4 patients), and the related 30-day mortality was 50.0% (2 out of 4 patients). During period 2, 21 patients with CRE colonization were detected, and the detection rate was significantly higher than that in period 1 (P < 0.001). Of the 21 colonized patients, 4 (19.0%) patients were identified as positive for CRE at the first screening, 5 (23.8%) were identified at the second screening, and the remaining 12 (57.1%) were identified at the third or later screening. The CRE BSI rate decreased to 0.5% (1/195), and there were no CRE-related death. Fifteen colonized patients developed neutropenic fever. Thirteen colonizers were preemptively treated with tigecycline within 24 h of fever onset, and they achieved rapid temperature control. One colonizer received tigecycline later than 48 h after fever onset and ultimately survived due to the addition of polymyxin. The other received tigecycline later than 72 h after fever onset and died of septic shock. CONCLUSION: The increase in screening frequency contributed to the detection of patients with CRE colonization. Targeted managements for these colonized patients may contribute to reducing the incidence and mortality of CRE BSI, therefore improving the prognosis of patients. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7077122/ /pubmed/32183898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0706-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yang, Ting-Ting Luo, Xue-Ping Yang, Qing Chen, Hong-Chao Luo, Yi Zhao, Yan-Min Ye, Yi-Shan Lai, Xiao-Yu Yu, Jian Tan, Ya-Min Wei, Guo-Qing Huang, He Shi, Ji-Min Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title | Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title_full | Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title_fullStr | Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title_short | Different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
title_sort | different screening frequencies of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which one is better? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-0706-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangtingting differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT luoxueping differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT yangqing differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT chenhongchao differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT luoyi differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT zhaoyanmin differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT yeyishan differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT laixiaoyu differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT yujian differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT tanyamin differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT weiguoqing differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT huanghe differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter AT shijimin differentscreeningfrequenciesofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeinpatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwhichoneisbetter |