Cargando…

TRI-PONDERAL MASS INDEX IS USEFUL FOR SCREENING CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH INSULIN RESISTANCE

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tri-ponderal mass index and body mass index Z scores are equivalent for screening children and adolescents with insulin resistance. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 296 children and adolescents enrolled at public schools of Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil, aged e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neves, Felipe Silva, Alvim, Rafael de Oliveira, Zaniqueli, Divanei, Pani, Virgilia Oliveira, Martins, Caroline Resende, Peçanha, Marcos Alves de Souza, Barbosa, Míriam Carmo Rodrigues, de Faria, Eliane Rodrigues, Mill, José Geraldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2019066
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tri-ponderal mass index and body mass index Z scores are equivalent for screening children and adolescents with insulin resistance. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 296 children and adolescents enrolled at public schools of Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil, aged eight to 14 years. The tri-ponderal mass index was calculated as the ratio between weight and height cubed. The body mass index was calculated as the ratio between weight and height squared. Insulin resistance was defined with the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: The HOMA-IR was higher in the 4(th) quartile of body mass index Z scores and tri-ponderal mass index compared to 1(st) and 2(nd) quartiles for both girls and boys. The areas under the age-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curves were similar between the indices for girls (body mass index Z scores=0.756; tri-ponderal mass index=0.763) and boys (body mass index Z scores=0.831; tri-ponderal mass index=0.843). In addition, according to the simple linear regression analyses estimations, both body mass index Z scores and tri-ponderal mass index explained a significant fraction of the homeostatic model assessment variability for girls (body mass index Z scores: R(2)=0.269; tri-ponderal mass index: R(2)=0.289; p<0.001) and boys (body mass index Z scores: R(2)=0.175; tri-ponderal mass index: R(2)=0.210; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The tri-ponderal mass index and body mass index Z scores were similar to discriminate children and adolescents with insulin resistance. It is noteworthy that the use of tri-ponderal mass index is clearly advantageous, because it can be calculated with no concerns on adjustments for the age, a fact that makes it very applicable in the clinical practice.