Cargando…

Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets

INTRODUCTION: Several advantages have been established regarding the efficiency of self-ligating brackets (SL). In spite of some controversy surrounding this question in the literature, clinical results confirm that “arch development” requires fewer extractions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moyano, Javier, Montagut, Diana, Perera, Ramon, Fernández-Bozal, Javier, Puigdollers, Andreu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar
_version_ 1783507526543736832
author Moyano, Javier
Montagut, Diana
Perera, Ramon
Fernández-Bozal, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
author_facet Moyano, Javier
Montagut, Diana
Perera, Ramon
Fernández-Bozal, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
author_sort Moyano, Javier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several advantages have been established regarding the efficiency of self-ligating brackets (SL). In spite of some controversy surrounding this question in the literature, clinical results confirm that “arch development” requires fewer extractions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare changes in the transverse and sagittal planes in patients treated with conventional ligating brackets (CL)as well as in patients treated with SL brackets and oversized arches. METHODS: A sample was selected from a pool of 300 consecutive cases treated by a single clinician: 51 patients with SL brackets and oversized wires, and 55 with CL brackets. These two groups were compared with a control group of 20 patients. All plaster models were scanned and dental landmarks were measured to identify changes from commencement (T(0)) to conclusion (T(1)) of treatment. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed for changes in the lower incisor (IMPA) and the first lower molar distal angulation (MAng). Intraoperator reliability was tested with linear regression analysis. To assure all groups were comparable at T(0), an ANOVA test with a 95%confidence interval (CI) was performed for all values. To assess changes from T(0) to T(1) in all groups, a Student’s t-test with 95% CI was used. Finally, results from the three groups were compared using an ANOVA-test (95% CI) and a post-hoc test. RESULTS: Increases in all the transverse variables were recorded in the two groups treated (SL and CL), except for the lower intercanine distance in the SL group. IMPA difference from T(0) to T(1) was higher in the CL group, and molar distal angulation (MAng) took place in the SL group. CONCLUSIONS: Self-ligating brackets with oversized arches and conventional ligating brackets showed increases in all variables in the transverse plane, except for the SL group at the mandibular intercanine distance. In comparison with the CL group, fewer different IMPA values were observed in the SL group, in which distal molar angulation occurred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7077942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70779422020-03-23 Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets Moyano, Javier Montagut, Diana Perera, Ramon Fernández-Bozal, Javier Puigdollers, Andreu Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: Several advantages have been established regarding the efficiency of self-ligating brackets (SL). In spite of some controversy surrounding this question in the literature, clinical results confirm that “arch development” requires fewer extractions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare changes in the transverse and sagittal planes in patients treated with conventional ligating brackets (CL)as well as in patients treated with SL brackets and oversized arches. METHODS: A sample was selected from a pool of 300 consecutive cases treated by a single clinician: 51 patients with SL brackets and oversized wires, and 55 with CL brackets. These two groups were compared with a control group of 20 patients. All plaster models were scanned and dental landmarks were measured to identify changes from commencement (T(0)) to conclusion (T(1)) of treatment. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed for changes in the lower incisor (IMPA) and the first lower molar distal angulation (MAng). Intraoperator reliability was tested with linear regression analysis. To assure all groups were comparable at T(0), an ANOVA test with a 95%confidence interval (CI) was performed for all values. To assess changes from T(0) to T(1) in all groups, a Student’s t-test with 95% CI was used. Finally, results from the three groups were compared using an ANOVA-test (95% CI) and a post-hoc test. RESULTS: Increases in all the transverse variables were recorded in the two groups treated (SL and CL), except for the lower intercanine distance in the SL group. IMPA difference from T(0) to T(1) was higher in the CL group, and molar distal angulation (MAng) took place in the SL group. CONCLUSIONS: Self-ligating brackets with oversized arches and conventional ligating brackets showed increases in all variables in the transverse plane, except for the SL group at the mandibular intercanine distance. In comparison with the CL group, fewer different IMPA values were observed in the SL group, in which distal molar angulation occurred. Dental Press International 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7077942/ /pubmed/32215477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Moyano, Javier
Montagut, Diana
Perera, Ramon
Fernández-Bozal, Javier
Puigdollers, Andreu
Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title_full Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title_fullStr Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title_short Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
title_sort comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT moyanojavier comparisonofchangesinthedentaltransverseandsagittalplanesbetweenpatientstreatedwithselfligatingandwithconventionalbrackets
AT montagutdiana comparisonofchangesinthedentaltransverseandsagittalplanesbetweenpatientstreatedwithselfligatingandwithconventionalbrackets
AT pereraramon comparisonofchangesinthedentaltransverseandsagittalplanesbetweenpatientstreatedwithselfligatingandwithconventionalbrackets
AT fernandezbozaljavier comparisonofchangesinthedentaltransverseandsagittalplanesbetweenpatientstreatedwithselfligatingandwithconventionalbrackets
AT puigdollersandreu comparisonofchangesinthedentaltransverseandsagittalplanesbetweenpatientstreatedwithselfligatingandwithconventionalbrackets