Cargando…

Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients

Echocardiographic measurements are used in critical care to evaluate volume status and cardiac performance. Mean systemic filling pressure and global heart efficiency measures intravascular volume and global heart function. This prospective study conducted in fifty haemodynamically stabilized, mecha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yastrebov, Konstantin, Aneman, Anders, Schulz, Luis, Hamp, Thomas, McCanny, Peter, Parkin, Geoffrey, Myburgh, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32184461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61761-1
_version_ 1783507579165474816
author Yastrebov, Konstantin
Aneman, Anders
Schulz, Luis
Hamp, Thomas
McCanny, Peter
Parkin, Geoffrey
Myburgh, John
author_facet Yastrebov, Konstantin
Aneman, Anders
Schulz, Luis
Hamp, Thomas
McCanny, Peter
Parkin, Geoffrey
Myburgh, John
author_sort Yastrebov, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description Echocardiographic measurements are used in critical care to evaluate volume status and cardiac performance. Mean systemic filling pressure and global heart efficiency measures intravascular volume and global heart function. This prospective study conducted in fifty haemodynamically stabilized, mechanically ventilated patients investigated relationships between static echocardiographic variables and estimates of global heart efficiency and mean systemic filling pressure. Results of univariate analysis demonstrated weak correlations between left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.27, p = 0.04), right atrial volume index (rho = 0.31, p = 0.03) and analogue mean systemic filling pressure; moderate correlations between left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.31, p = 0.03), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (r = 0.36, p = 0.04), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (rho = 0.37, p = 0.01) and global heart efficiency. No significant correlations were demonstrated by multiple regression. Mean systemic filling pressure calculated with cardiac output measured by echocardiography demonstrated good agreement and correlation with invasive techniques (bias 0.52 ± 1.7 mmHg, limits of agreement −2.9 to 3.9 mmHg, r = 0.9, p < 0.001). Static echocardiographic variables did not reliably reflect the volume state as defined by estimates of mean systemic filling pressure. The agreement between static echocardiographic variables of cardiac performance and global heart efficiency lacked robustness. Echocardiographic measurements of cardiac output can be reliably used in calculation of mean systemic filling pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70782482020-03-23 Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients Yastrebov, Konstantin Aneman, Anders Schulz, Luis Hamp, Thomas McCanny, Peter Parkin, Geoffrey Myburgh, John Sci Rep Article Echocardiographic measurements are used in critical care to evaluate volume status and cardiac performance. Mean systemic filling pressure and global heart efficiency measures intravascular volume and global heart function. This prospective study conducted in fifty haemodynamically stabilized, mechanically ventilated patients investigated relationships between static echocardiographic variables and estimates of global heart efficiency and mean systemic filling pressure. Results of univariate analysis demonstrated weak correlations between left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.27, p = 0.04), right atrial volume index (rho = 0.31, p = 0.03) and analogue mean systemic filling pressure; moderate correlations between left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.31, p = 0.03), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (r = 0.36, p = 0.04), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (rho = 0.37, p = 0.01) and global heart efficiency. No significant correlations were demonstrated by multiple regression. Mean systemic filling pressure calculated with cardiac output measured by echocardiography demonstrated good agreement and correlation with invasive techniques (bias 0.52 ± 1.7 mmHg, limits of agreement −2.9 to 3.9 mmHg, r = 0.9, p < 0.001). Static echocardiographic variables did not reliably reflect the volume state as defined by estimates of mean systemic filling pressure. The agreement between static echocardiographic variables of cardiac performance and global heart efficiency lacked robustness. Echocardiographic measurements of cardiac output can be reliably used in calculation of mean systemic filling pressure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7078248/ /pubmed/32184461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61761-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Yastrebov, Konstantin
Aneman, Anders
Schulz, Luis
Hamp, Thomas
McCanny, Peter
Parkin, Geoffrey
Myburgh, John
Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title_full Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title_fullStr Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title_short Comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
title_sort comparison of echocardiographic and invasive measures of volaemia and cardiac performance in critically ill patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32184461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61761-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yastrebovkonstantin comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT anemananders comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT schulzluis comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT hampthomas comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT mccannypeter comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT parkingeoffrey comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients
AT myburghjohn comparisonofechocardiographicandinvasivemeasuresofvolaemiaandcardiacperformanceincriticallyillpatients