Cargando…
Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines
Academic scientists' engagement with industry is a central mechanism in university-industry knowledge transfer and the development of collaborative research. However, most empirical studies are limited to researchers in technical disciplines. We extend the analysis beyond engineers to include b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03404 |
_version_ | 1783507584090636288 |
---|---|
author | Kotiranta, Annu Tahvanainen, Antti Kovalainen, Anne Poutanen, Seppo |
author_facet | Kotiranta, Annu Tahvanainen, Antti Kovalainen, Anne Poutanen, Seppo |
author_sort | Kotiranta, Annu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Academic scientists' engagement with industry is a central mechanism in university-industry knowledge transfer and the development of collaborative research. However, most empirical studies are limited to researchers in technical disciplines. We extend the analysis beyond engineers to include broader disciplinary fields, including humanists, economists, medicine, biosciences and cross-disciplinary scientists. Our findings suggest that cross-disciplinary researchers and researchers in technical sciences engage in more industry interaction than their peers. The motivations for the choice of research area play an important role in industry collaboration. Furthermore, we identify three types of industry interaction (interaction modes) among researchers: 1. educational interaction, consisting of conferences or seminars, corporate training programs, or supervising thesis work; 2. research interaction, consisting of shared publications, research-related consulting, public research programs and contract research; 3. integrated interaction, consisting of joint research in shared premisesand employment contracts with companies. Of these, the educational and research interaction modes (1 and 2) are motivated by the possibility of individual academic advancement. Integrated interaction (3) is rare and significantly correlates with only one of the three types of industry cooperation motivations: commercialization of research findings. We conclude by identifying future research needs, opportunities for methodological improvement and policy interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7078269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70782692020-03-19 Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines Kotiranta, Annu Tahvanainen, Antti Kovalainen, Anne Poutanen, Seppo Heliyon Article Academic scientists' engagement with industry is a central mechanism in university-industry knowledge transfer and the development of collaborative research. However, most empirical studies are limited to researchers in technical disciplines. We extend the analysis beyond engineers to include broader disciplinary fields, including humanists, economists, medicine, biosciences and cross-disciplinary scientists. Our findings suggest that cross-disciplinary researchers and researchers in technical sciences engage in more industry interaction than their peers. The motivations for the choice of research area play an important role in industry collaboration. Furthermore, we identify three types of industry interaction (interaction modes) among researchers: 1. educational interaction, consisting of conferences or seminars, corporate training programs, or supervising thesis work; 2. research interaction, consisting of shared publications, research-related consulting, public research programs and contract research; 3. integrated interaction, consisting of joint research in shared premisesand employment contracts with companies. Of these, the educational and research interaction modes (1 and 2) are motivated by the possibility of individual academic advancement. Integrated interaction (3) is rare and significantly correlates with only one of the three types of industry cooperation motivations: commercialization of research findings. We conclude by identifying future research needs, opportunities for methodological improvement and policy interventions. Elsevier 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7078269/ /pubmed/32195382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03404 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kotiranta, Annu Tahvanainen, Antti Kovalainen, Anne Poutanen, Seppo Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title | Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title_full | Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title_fullStr | Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title_full_unstemmed | Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title_short | Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
title_sort | forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotirantaannu formsandvarietiesofresearchandindustrycollaborationacrossdisciplines AT tahvanainenantti formsandvarietiesofresearchandindustrycollaborationacrossdisciplines AT kovalainenanne formsandvarietiesofresearchandindustrycollaborationacrossdisciplines AT poutanenseppo formsandvarietiesofresearchandindustrycollaborationacrossdisciplines |