Cargando…

Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations

PURPOSE: To assess the anthropometric dimensions of the coracoid process and the glenoid articular surface and to determine possible implications with the different commercially available Latarjet fixation techniques. METHODS: In a total of 101 skeletal scapulae the glenoid length (GL), the glenoid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boutsiadis, Achilleas, Bampis, Ioannis, Swan, John, Barth, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00230-0
_version_ 1783507613396238336
author Boutsiadis, Achilleas
Bampis, Ioannis
Swan, John
Barth, Johannes
author_facet Boutsiadis, Achilleas
Bampis, Ioannis
Swan, John
Barth, Johannes
author_sort Boutsiadis, Achilleas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the anthropometric dimensions of the coracoid process and the glenoid articular surface and to determine possible implications with the different commercially available Latarjet fixation techniques. METHODS: In a total of 101 skeletal scapulae the glenoid length (GL), the glenoid width (GW), the coracoid length (CL), the coracoid width (CW) and the coracoid thickness (CTh) were measured. In order to assess the ability of the transferred coracoid to restore the glenoid anatomy we created a hypothetical model of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% glenoid bone loss. We analyzed four common surgical fixation techniques for the Latarjet procedure (4.5 mm screws, 3.75 mm screws, 3.5 mm screws, and 2.8 mm button). The distances from the superior-inferior and medio-lateral limits of the coracoid using the four different fixation methods were calculated. We hypothesized that the “safe distance” between the implant and the coracoid osteotomy should be at least equal to the diameter of the implant. RESULTS: The intra and inter-observer reliability tests were almost perfect for all measurements. The mean GH was 36.8 ± 2.5 mm, the GW 26.4 ± 2.2 mm, the CL 23.9 ± 3 mm, the CW 13.6 ± 2.mm, and the mean CTh was 8.7 ± 1.3 mm. The CL was < 25 mm in 46% of the cases. In cases with 25% and 30% bone loss, the coracoid graft restored the glenoid anatomy in 96% and 79.2% of the cases. With the use of the 4.5 mm screws the “safe distance” was present in 56% of the cases, with the 3.75 mm screws in 85%, with the 3.5 mm screws in 87%, and with the 2.8 mm button in 98% of the cases. The distance from the medio-lateral limit of the coracoid could be significantly increased (up to 9 mm) when smaller-button implants are used. CONCLUSIONS: The coracoid graft could not always restore glenoid defects of 30%. Larger implants could be positioned too close to the osteotomy and the “medio-lateral offset” of the coracoid could be increased with smaller implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70783962020-03-23 Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations Boutsiadis, Achilleas Bampis, Ioannis Swan, John Barth, Johannes J Exp Orthop Research PURPOSE: To assess the anthropometric dimensions of the coracoid process and the glenoid articular surface and to determine possible implications with the different commercially available Latarjet fixation techniques. METHODS: In a total of 101 skeletal scapulae the glenoid length (GL), the glenoid width (GW), the coracoid length (CL), the coracoid width (CW) and the coracoid thickness (CTh) were measured. In order to assess the ability of the transferred coracoid to restore the glenoid anatomy we created a hypothetical model of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% glenoid bone loss. We analyzed four common surgical fixation techniques for the Latarjet procedure (4.5 mm screws, 3.75 mm screws, 3.5 mm screws, and 2.8 mm button). The distances from the superior-inferior and medio-lateral limits of the coracoid using the four different fixation methods were calculated. We hypothesized that the “safe distance” between the implant and the coracoid osteotomy should be at least equal to the diameter of the implant. RESULTS: The intra and inter-observer reliability tests were almost perfect for all measurements. The mean GH was 36.8 ± 2.5 mm, the GW 26.4 ± 2.2 mm, the CL 23.9 ± 3 mm, the CW 13.6 ± 2.mm, and the mean CTh was 8.7 ± 1.3 mm. The CL was < 25 mm in 46% of the cases. In cases with 25% and 30% bone loss, the coracoid graft restored the glenoid anatomy in 96% and 79.2% of the cases. With the use of the 4.5 mm screws the “safe distance” was present in 56% of the cases, with the 3.75 mm screws in 85%, with the 3.5 mm screws in 87%, and with the 2.8 mm button in 98% of the cases. The distance from the medio-lateral limit of the coracoid could be significantly increased (up to 9 mm) when smaller-button implants are used. CONCLUSIONS: The coracoid graft could not always restore glenoid defects of 30%. Larger implants could be positioned too close to the osteotomy and the “medio-lateral offset” of the coracoid could be increased with smaller implants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7078396/ /pubmed/32185534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00230-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Boutsiadis, Achilleas
Bampis, Ioannis
Swan, John
Barth, Johannes
Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title_full Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title_fullStr Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title_full_unstemmed Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title_short Best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
title_sort best implant choice for coracoid graft fixation during the latarjet procedure depends on patients’ morphometric considerations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00230-0
work_keys_str_mv AT boutsiadisachilleas bestimplantchoiceforcoracoidgraftfixationduringthelatarjetproceduredependsonpatientsmorphometricconsiderations
AT bampisioannis bestimplantchoiceforcoracoidgraftfixationduringthelatarjetproceduredependsonpatientsmorphometricconsiderations
AT swanjohn bestimplantchoiceforcoracoidgraftfixationduringthelatarjetproceduredependsonpatientsmorphometricconsiderations
AT barthjohannes bestimplantchoiceforcoracoidgraftfixationduringthelatarjetproceduredependsonpatientsmorphometricconsiderations