Cargando…

Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep

The objective of this study was to compare the healing of the augmented sinus at which the antrostomy was covered with a membrane or the repositioned bone plate. Eight sheep underwent bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The control site was covered with a resorbable membrane, while at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perini, Alessandro, Ferrante, Giada, Sivolella, Stefano, Velez, Joaquín Urbizo, Bengazi, Franco, Botticelli, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-0207-1
_version_ 1783507616387825664
author Perini, Alessandro
Ferrante, Giada
Sivolella, Stefano
Velez, Joaquín Urbizo
Bengazi, Franco
Botticelli, Daniele
author_facet Perini, Alessandro
Ferrante, Giada
Sivolella, Stefano
Velez, Joaquín Urbizo
Bengazi, Franco
Botticelli, Daniele
author_sort Perini, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to compare the healing of the augmented sinus at which the antrostomy was covered with a membrane or the repositioned bone plate. Eight sheep underwent bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The control site was covered with a resorbable membrane, while at the experimental site the bone plate was repositioned, and both were secured with cyanoacrylate. Animals were euthanised after 4 months and histomorphometric analysis was performed. A large amount of the graft appeared to be partially interpenetrated by the newly formed bone. Statistical analysis demonstrated different percentages of the new bone and bone interpenetrated to the graft between test and control site in the close-to-window area respectively 22.1 ± 12.6 vs 7.5 ± 4.5 (P = 0.028) and 66.1 ± 14.7 vs 44.2 ± 15.1 (P = 0.046). Other areas showed no difference in the bone and graft amount. More bone was found at the edges of the antrostomy in the experimental site, without statistical significance. In the centre of the antrostomy, the replaced bony window appeared bonded to the newly formed bone. No remnants and no biological response to cyanoacrylate were observed. The repositioning of the bony window after sinus floor elevation in sheep led to a larger amount of newly formed bone in the close-to-window zone of the grafted area. The bony window appeared partially bonded to the new bone. Newly formed bone was found interpenetrating the graft granules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70784142020-03-23 Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep Perini, Alessandro Ferrante, Giada Sivolella, Stefano Velez, Joaquín Urbizo Bengazi, Franco Botticelli, Daniele Int J Implant Dent Research The objective of this study was to compare the healing of the augmented sinus at which the antrostomy was covered with a membrane or the repositioned bone plate. Eight sheep underwent bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The control site was covered with a resorbable membrane, while at the experimental site the bone plate was repositioned, and both were secured with cyanoacrylate. Animals were euthanised after 4 months and histomorphometric analysis was performed. A large amount of the graft appeared to be partially interpenetrated by the newly formed bone. Statistical analysis demonstrated different percentages of the new bone and bone interpenetrated to the graft between test and control site in the close-to-window area respectively 22.1 ± 12.6 vs 7.5 ± 4.5 (P = 0.028) and 66.1 ± 14.7 vs 44.2 ± 15.1 (P = 0.046). Other areas showed no difference in the bone and graft amount. More bone was found at the edges of the antrostomy in the experimental site, without statistical significance. In the centre of the antrostomy, the replaced bony window appeared bonded to the newly formed bone. No remnants and no biological response to cyanoacrylate were observed. The repositioning of the bony window after sinus floor elevation in sheep led to a larger amount of newly formed bone in the close-to-window zone of the grafted area. The bony window appeared partially bonded to the new bone. Newly formed bone was found interpenetrating the graft granules. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7078414/ /pubmed/32185531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-0207-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Perini, Alessandro
Ferrante, Giada
Sivolella, Stefano
Velez, Joaquín Urbizo
Bengazi, Franco
Botticelli, Daniele
Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title_full Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title_fullStr Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title_short Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
title_sort bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in sheep
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-0207-1
work_keys_str_mv AT perinialessandro boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep
AT ferrantegiada boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep
AT sivolellastefano boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep
AT velezjoaquinurbizo boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep
AT bengazifranco boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep
AT botticellidaniele boneplaterepositionedovertheantrostomyaftersinusfloorelevationanexperimentalstudyinsheep