Cargando…
Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016
Prospective, population-based surveillance to systematically ascertain exposures to food production animals or their environments among Minnesota residents with sporadic, domestically acquired, laboratory-confirmed enteric zoonotic pathogen infections was conducted from 2012 through 2016. Twenty-thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819002309 |
_version_ | 1783507649410629632 |
---|---|
author | Klumb, CA Scheftel, JM Smith, KE |
author_facet | Klumb, CA Scheftel, JM Smith, KE |
author_sort | Klumb, CA |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prospective, population-based surveillance to systematically ascertain exposures to food production animals or their environments among Minnesota residents with sporadic, domestically acquired, laboratory-confirmed enteric zoonotic pathogen infections was conducted from 2012 through 2016. Twenty-three percent (n = 1708) of the 7560 enteric disease cases in the study reported an animal agriculture exposure in their incubation period, including 60% (344/571) of Cryptosporidium parvum cases, 28% (934/3391) of Campylobacter cases, 22% (85/383) of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157 cases, 16% (83/521) of non-O157 STEC cases, 10% (253/2575) of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica cases and 8% (9/119) of Yersinia enterocolitica cases. Living and/or working on a farm accounted for 61% of cases with an agricultural exposure, followed by visiting a private farm (29% of cases) and visiting a public animal agriculture venue (10% of cases). Cattle were the most common animal type in agricultural exposures, reported by 72% of cases. The estimated cumulative incidence of zoonotic enteric infections for people who live and/or work on farms with food production animals in Minnesota during 2012–2016 was 147 per 10 000 population, vs. 18.5 per 10 000 for other Minnesotans. The burden of enteric zoonoses among people with animal agriculture exposures appears to be far greater than previously appreciated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7078579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70785792020-03-23 Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 Klumb, CA Scheftel, JM Smith, KE Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Prospective, population-based surveillance to systematically ascertain exposures to food production animals or their environments among Minnesota residents with sporadic, domestically acquired, laboratory-confirmed enteric zoonotic pathogen infections was conducted from 2012 through 2016. Twenty-three percent (n = 1708) of the 7560 enteric disease cases in the study reported an animal agriculture exposure in their incubation period, including 60% (344/571) of Cryptosporidium parvum cases, 28% (934/3391) of Campylobacter cases, 22% (85/383) of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157 cases, 16% (83/521) of non-O157 STEC cases, 10% (253/2575) of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica cases and 8% (9/119) of Yersinia enterocolitica cases. Living and/or working on a farm accounted for 61% of cases with an agricultural exposure, followed by visiting a private farm (29% of cases) and visiting a public animal agriculture venue (10% of cases). Cattle were the most common animal type in agricultural exposures, reported by 72% of cases. The estimated cumulative incidence of zoonotic enteric infections for people who live and/or work on farms with food production animals in Minnesota during 2012–2016 was 147 per 10 000 population, vs. 18.5 per 10 000 for other Minnesotans. The burden of enteric zoonoses among people with animal agriculture exposures appears to be far greater than previously appreciated. Cambridge University Press 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7078579/ /pubmed/32172700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819002309 Text en © The Author(s) and Minnesota Department of Health 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Klumb, CA Scheftel, JM Smith, KE Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title | Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title_full | Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title_fullStr | Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title_short | Animal agriculture exposures among Minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
title_sort | animal agriculture exposures among minnesota residents with zoonotic enteric infections, 2012–2016 |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819002309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klumbca animalagricultureexposuresamongminnesotaresidentswithzoonoticentericinfections20122016 AT schefteljm animalagricultureexposuresamongminnesotaresidentswithzoonoticentericinfections20122016 AT smithke animalagricultureexposuresamongminnesotaresidentswithzoonoticentericinfections20122016 |