Cargando…

Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?

Sewage sludge (SS) recycling is an important part of the proposed ‘circular economy’ concept. SS can be valorized via torrefaction (also known as ‘low-temperature pyrolysis’ or ‘roasting’). SS can, therefore, be considered a low-quality fuel or a source of nutrients essential for plant growth. Bioch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulka, Jakub, Manczarski, Piotr, Stępień, Paweł, Styczyńska, Marzena, Koziel, Jacek A., Białowiec, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040954
_version_ 1783507677249273856
author Pulka, Jakub
Manczarski, Piotr
Stępień, Paweł
Styczyńska, Marzena
Koziel, Jacek A.
Białowiec, Andrzej
author_facet Pulka, Jakub
Manczarski, Piotr
Stępień, Paweł
Styczyńska, Marzena
Koziel, Jacek A.
Białowiec, Andrzej
author_sort Pulka, Jakub
collection PubMed
description Sewage sludge (SS) recycling is an important part of the proposed ‘circular economy’ concept. SS can be valorized via torrefaction (also known as ‘low-temperature pyrolysis’ or ‘roasting’). SS can, therefore, be considered a low-quality fuel or a source of nutrients essential for plant growth. Biochar produced by torrefaction of SS is a form of carbonized fuel or fertilizer. In this research, for the first time, we tested the feasibility of torrefaction of SS with high ash content for either fuel or organic fertilizer production. The research was conducted in 18 variants (six torrefaction temperatures between 200~300 °C, and three process residence times of 20, 40, 60 min) in 5 repetitions. Fuel and fertilizer properties and multiple regression analysis of produced biochar were conducted. The higher heating value (HHV) of raw SS was 21.2 MJ·kg(−1). Produced biochar was characterized by HHV up to 12.85 MJ·kg(−1) and lower H/C and O/C molar ratio. Therefore, torrefaction of SS with high ash content should not be considered as a method for improving the fuel properties. Instead, the production of fertilizer appears to be favorable. The torrefaction increased C, N, Mg, Ca, K, Na concentration in relation to raw SS. No significant (p < 0.05) influence of the increase of temperature and residence time on the increase of biogenic elements in biochar was found, however the highest biogenic element content, were found in biochar produced for 60 min, under the temperature ranging from 200 to 240 °C. Obtained biochars met the Polish regulatory criteria for mineral-organic fertilizer. Therefore SS torrefaction may be considered a feasible waste recycling technology. The calculation of torrefaction energy and the mass balance shows energy demand <2.5 GJ∙Mg(−1) w.m., and the expected mass yield of the product, organic fertilizer, is ~178 kg∙Mg(−1) w.m of SS. Further investigation should consider the scaling-up of the SS torrefaction process, with the application of other types of SSs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70787122020-04-21 Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer? Pulka, Jakub Manczarski, Piotr Stępień, Paweł Styczyńska, Marzena Koziel, Jacek A. Białowiec, Andrzej Materials (Basel) Article Sewage sludge (SS) recycling is an important part of the proposed ‘circular economy’ concept. SS can be valorized via torrefaction (also known as ‘low-temperature pyrolysis’ or ‘roasting’). SS can, therefore, be considered a low-quality fuel or a source of nutrients essential for plant growth. Biochar produced by torrefaction of SS is a form of carbonized fuel or fertilizer. In this research, for the first time, we tested the feasibility of torrefaction of SS with high ash content for either fuel or organic fertilizer production. The research was conducted in 18 variants (six torrefaction temperatures between 200~300 °C, and three process residence times of 20, 40, 60 min) in 5 repetitions. Fuel and fertilizer properties and multiple regression analysis of produced biochar were conducted. The higher heating value (HHV) of raw SS was 21.2 MJ·kg(−1). Produced biochar was characterized by HHV up to 12.85 MJ·kg(−1) and lower H/C and O/C molar ratio. Therefore, torrefaction of SS with high ash content should not be considered as a method for improving the fuel properties. Instead, the production of fertilizer appears to be favorable. The torrefaction increased C, N, Mg, Ca, K, Na concentration in relation to raw SS. No significant (p < 0.05) influence of the increase of temperature and residence time on the increase of biogenic elements in biochar was found, however the highest biogenic element content, were found in biochar produced for 60 min, under the temperature ranging from 200 to 240 °C. Obtained biochars met the Polish regulatory criteria for mineral-organic fertilizer. Therefore SS torrefaction may be considered a feasible waste recycling technology. The calculation of torrefaction energy and the mass balance shows energy demand <2.5 GJ∙Mg(−1) w.m., and the expected mass yield of the product, organic fertilizer, is ~178 kg∙Mg(−1) w.m of SS. Further investigation should consider the scaling-up of the SS torrefaction process, with the application of other types of SSs. MDPI 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7078712/ /pubmed/32093350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040954 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pulka, Jakub
Manczarski, Piotr
Stępień, Paweł
Styczyńska, Marzena
Koziel, Jacek A.
Białowiec, Andrzej
Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title_full Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title_fullStr Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title_full_unstemmed Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title_short Waste-to-Carbon: Is the Torrefied Sewage Sludge with High Ash Content a Better Fuel or Fertilizer?
title_sort waste-to-carbon: is the torrefied sewage sludge with high ash content a better fuel or fertilizer?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040954
work_keys_str_mv AT pulkajakub wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer
AT manczarskipiotr wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer
AT stepienpaweł wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer
AT styczynskamarzena wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer
AT kozieljaceka wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer
AT białowiecandrzej wastetocarbonisthetorrefiedsewagesludgewithhighashcontentabetterfuelorfertilizer