Cargando…

The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints

This work aims to compare the ultrasonic inspection of 9%Ni steel joints welded with the Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) process and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) process. These are the two most widely used processes used to weld pipes for CO(2) injection units for floating production storage and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Cruz Payão Filho, João, Kimus Dias Passos, Elisa, Stohler Gonzaga, Rodrigo, Drumond Santos, Daniel, Pereira Maia, Vinicius, Russo Juliano, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040961
_version_ 1783507678663802880
author da Cruz Payão Filho, João
Kimus Dias Passos, Elisa
Stohler Gonzaga, Rodrigo
Drumond Santos, Daniel
Pereira Maia, Vinicius
Russo Juliano, Diego
author_facet da Cruz Payão Filho, João
Kimus Dias Passos, Elisa
Stohler Gonzaga, Rodrigo
Drumond Santos, Daniel
Pereira Maia, Vinicius
Russo Juliano, Diego
author_sort da Cruz Payão Filho, João
collection PubMed
description This work aims to compare the ultrasonic inspection of 9%Ni steel joints welded with the Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) process and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) process. These are the two most widely used processes used to weld pipes for CO(2) injection units for floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) in the Brazilian oil and gas industry. The SMAW equipment is simple and portable, which is convenient for the FPSO; however, the GMAW process has the advantage of welding with high productivity. In this study we performed a numerical simulation using the software CIVA, 11th version, to analyze the behavior of ultrasonic longitudinal wave beams through GMAW and SMAW dissimilar weld joints. Ultrasonic tests were performed on calibration blocks drawn from both welded joints to evaluate the simulation results. The results are discussed with regard to the microstructure of the weld metal via electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analyses. The SMAW process presented better inspection performance than the GMAW process in terms of attenuation and dispersion effects. Although the SMAW had a better outcome, for both processes the configuration of 16 active elements and a scanning angle of 48° resulted in an optimized inspection of the entire joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70787182020-04-21 The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints da Cruz Payão Filho, João Kimus Dias Passos, Elisa Stohler Gonzaga, Rodrigo Drumond Santos, Daniel Pereira Maia, Vinicius Russo Juliano, Diego Materials (Basel) Article This work aims to compare the ultrasonic inspection of 9%Ni steel joints welded with the Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) process and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) process. These are the two most widely used processes used to weld pipes for CO(2) injection units for floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) in the Brazilian oil and gas industry. The SMAW equipment is simple and portable, which is convenient for the FPSO; however, the GMAW process has the advantage of welding with high productivity. In this study we performed a numerical simulation using the software CIVA, 11th version, to analyze the behavior of ultrasonic longitudinal wave beams through GMAW and SMAW dissimilar weld joints. Ultrasonic tests were performed on calibration blocks drawn from both welded joints to evaluate the simulation results. The results are discussed with regard to the microstructure of the weld metal via electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analyses. The SMAW process presented better inspection performance than the GMAW process in terms of attenuation and dispersion effects. Although the SMAW had a better outcome, for both processes the configuration of 16 active elements and a scanning angle of 48° resulted in an optimized inspection of the entire joint. MDPI 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7078718/ /pubmed/32098044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040961 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
da Cruz Payão Filho, João
Kimus Dias Passos, Elisa
Stohler Gonzaga, Rodrigo
Drumond Santos, Daniel
Pereira Maia, Vinicius
Russo Juliano, Diego
The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title_full The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title_fullStr The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title_short The Influence of the Welding Process on the Ultrasonic Inspection of 9%Ni Steel Pipe Circumferential Welded Joints
title_sort influence of the welding process on the ultrasonic inspection of 9%ni steel pipe circumferential welded joints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32098044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040961
work_keys_str_mv AT dacruzpayaofilhojoao theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT kimusdiaspassoselisa theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT stohlergonzagarodrigo theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT drumondsantosdaniel theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT pereiramaiavinicius theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT russojulianodiego theinfluenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT dacruzpayaofilhojoao influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT kimusdiaspassoselisa influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT stohlergonzagarodrigo influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT drumondsantosdaniel influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT pereiramaiavinicius influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints
AT russojulianodiego influenceoftheweldingprocessontheultrasonicinspectionof9nisteelpipecircumferentialweldedjoints