Cargando…
Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome
INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of symptoms at disease presentation of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterise these symptoms and correlate them with the outcome, so new prognostic markers can be defined. METHODS: We analysed clinical data in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000623 |
_version_ | 1783507689225060352 |
---|---|
author | Puhr, Hannah Christina Pablik, Eleonore Berghoff, Anna Sophie Jomrich, Gerd Schoppmann, Sebastian Friedrich Preusser, Matthias Ilhan-Mutlu, Aysegül |
author_facet | Puhr, Hannah Christina Pablik, Eleonore Berghoff, Anna Sophie Jomrich, Gerd Schoppmann, Sebastian Friedrich Preusser, Matthias Ilhan-Mutlu, Aysegül |
author_sort | Puhr, Hannah Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of symptoms at disease presentation of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterise these symptoms and correlate them with the outcome, so new prognostic markers can be defined. METHODS: We analysed clinical data including symptoms, therapies and survival of patients with stage IV gastro-oesophageal cancer treated between 2002 and 2018 at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. Initial symptoms as well as stenosis in endoscopy and HER2 positivity were evaluated in a cross-validation model to ascertain the impact of each variable on patient survival. RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were evaluated. Five factors (stenosis in endoscopy, weight loss, HER2 positivity, dyspepsia, ulcer or active bleeding) have proven to be statistically relevant prognostic factors and were given a count of +1 and −1, if applicable. The resulting score ranges between −3 and +2. The survival probability for 180 days with a score of −3/–2, −1, 0, +1 and +2 is 90%, 80%, 73%, 72% and 42%, whereas for 2 years, it is 30%, 30%, 8%, 7% and 3%, respectively. The median overall survival of a score of −3/–2, −1, 0, +1 and +2 was 579 (95% CI 274 to not measurable), 481 (95% CI 358 to 637), 297 (95% CI 240 to 346), 284 (95% CI 205 to 371), 146 (95% CI 120 to 229) days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data from this retrospective study indicate that the Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms score provides independent prognostic information that may support clinical decision making at diagnosis of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. Our findings should be evaluated in prospective studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7078766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70787662020-03-23 Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome Puhr, Hannah Christina Pablik, Eleonore Berghoff, Anna Sophie Jomrich, Gerd Schoppmann, Sebastian Friedrich Preusser, Matthias Ilhan-Mutlu, Aysegül ESMO Open Original Research INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of symptoms at disease presentation of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterise these symptoms and correlate them with the outcome, so new prognostic markers can be defined. METHODS: We analysed clinical data including symptoms, therapies and survival of patients with stage IV gastro-oesophageal cancer treated between 2002 and 2018 at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. Initial symptoms as well as stenosis in endoscopy and HER2 positivity were evaluated in a cross-validation model to ascertain the impact of each variable on patient survival. RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were evaluated. Five factors (stenosis in endoscopy, weight loss, HER2 positivity, dyspepsia, ulcer or active bleeding) have proven to be statistically relevant prognostic factors and were given a count of +1 and −1, if applicable. The resulting score ranges between −3 and +2. The survival probability for 180 days with a score of −3/–2, −1, 0, +1 and +2 is 90%, 80%, 73%, 72% and 42%, whereas for 2 years, it is 30%, 30%, 8%, 7% and 3%, respectively. The median overall survival of a score of −3/–2, −1, 0, +1 and +2 was 579 (95% CI 274 to not measurable), 481 (95% CI 358 to 637), 297 (95% CI 240 to 346), 284 (95% CI 205 to 371), 146 (95% CI 120 to 229) days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data from this retrospective study indicate that the Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms score provides independent prognostic information that may support clinical decision making at diagnosis of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. Our findings should be evaluated in prospective studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7078766/ /pubmed/32188713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000623 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Puhr, Hannah Christina Pablik, Eleonore Berghoff, Anna Sophie Jomrich, Gerd Schoppmann, Sebastian Friedrich Preusser, Matthias Ilhan-Mutlu, Aysegül Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title | Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title_full | Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title_fullStr | Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title_short | Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
title_sort | viennese risk prediction score for advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma based on alarm symptoms (vagas score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puhrhannahchristina vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT pablikeleonore vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT berghoffannasophie vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT jomrichgerd vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT schoppmannsebastianfriedrich vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT preussermatthias vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome AT ilhanmutluaysegul vienneseriskpredictionscoreforadvancedgastroesophagealcarcinomabasedonalarmsymptomsvagasscorecharacterisationofalarmsymptomsinadvancedgastrooesophagealcanceranditscorrelationwithoutcome |