Cargando…

High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mann, Tobias, Eggers, Kerstin, Rippke, Frank, Tesch, Mirko, Buerger, Anette, Darvin, Maxim E., Schanzer, Sabine, Meinke, Martina C., Lademann, Jürgen, Kolbe, Ludger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523
_version_ 1783507697841209344
author Mann, Tobias
Eggers, Kerstin
Rippke, Frank
Tesch, Mirko
Buerger, Anette
Darvin, Maxim E.
Schanzer, Sabine
Meinke, Martina C.
Lademann, Jürgen
Kolbe, Ludger
author_facet Mann, Tobias
Eggers, Kerstin
Rippke, Frank
Tesch, Mirko
Buerger, Anette
Darvin, Maxim E.
Schanzer, Sabine
Meinke, Martina C.
Lademann, Jürgen
Kolbe, Ludger
author_sort Mann, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. METHODS: We investigated VIS‐induced ROS formation and the photoprotective effects of the Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A (LicA). RESULTS: Visible spectrum of 400‐500 nm dose‐dependently induced ROS in cultured human fibroblasts at doses equivalent to 1 hour of sunshine on a sunny summer day (150 J/cm(2)). A pretreatment for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L LicA reduced ROS formation to the level of unirradiated cells while UV filters alone were ineffective, even at SPF50+. In vivo, topical treatment with a LicA‐containing SPF50 + formulation significantly prevented the depletion of intradermal carotenoids by VIS irradiation while SPF50 + control did not protect. CONCLUSION: LicA may be a useful additive antioxidant for sunscreens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70788162020-03-19 High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo Mann, Tobias Eggers, Kerstin Rippke, Frank Tesch, Mirko Buerger, Anette Darvin, Maxim E. Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Lademann, Jürgen Kolbe, Ludger Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed Original Articles BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. METHODS: We investigated VIS‐induced ROS formation and the photoprotective effects of the Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A (LicA). RESULTS: Visible spectrum of 400‐500 nm dose‐dependently induced ROS in cultured human fibroblasts at doses equivalent to 1 hour of sunshine on a sunny summer day (150 J/cm(2)). A pretreatment for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L LicA reduced ROS formation to the level of unirradiated cells while UV filters alone were ineffective, even at SPF50+. In vivo, topical treatment with a LicA‐containing SPF50 + formulation significantly prevented the depletion of intradermal carotenoids by VIS irradiation while SPF50 + control did not protect. CONCLUSION: LicA may be a useful additive antioxidant for sunscreens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-17 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7078816/ /pubmed/31661571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mann, Tobias
Eggers, Kerstin
Rippke, Frank
Tesch, Mirko
Buerger, Anette
Darvin, Maxim E.
Schanzer, Sabine
Meinke, Martina C.
Lademann, Jürgen
Kolbe, Ludger
High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title_full High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title_fullStr High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title_full_unstemmed High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title_short High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
title_sort high‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—protective effects of the antioxidant and nrf2 inducer licochalcone a in vitro and in vivo
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523
work_keys_str_mv AT manntobias highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT eggerskerstin highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT rippkefrank highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT teschmirko highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT buergeranette highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT darvinmaxime highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT schanzersabine highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT meinkemartinac highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT lademannjurgen highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo
AT kolbeludger highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo