Cargando…
High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo
BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523 |
_version_ | 1783507697841209344 |
---|---|
author | Mann, Tobias Eggers, Kerstin Rippke, Frank Tesch, Mirko Buerger, Anette Darvin, Maxim E. Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Lademann, Jürgen Kolbe, Ludger |
author_facet | Mann, Tobias Eggers, Kerstin Rippke, Frank Tesch, Mirko Buerger, Anette Darvin, Maxim E. Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Lademann, Jürgen Kolbe, Ludger |
author_sort | Mann, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. METHODS: We investigated VIS‐induced ROS formation and the photoprotective effects of the Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A (LicA). RESULTS: Visible spectrum of 400‐500 nm dose‐dependently induced ROS in cultured human fibroblasts at doses equivalent to 1 hour of sunshine on a sunny summer day (150 J/cm(2)). A pretreatment for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L LicA reduced ROS formation to the level of unirradiated cells while UV filters alone were ineffective, even at SPF50+. In vivo, topical treatment with a LicA‐containing SPF50 + formulation significantly prevented the depletion of intradermal carotenoids by VIS irradiation while SPF50 + control did not protect. CONCLUSION: LicA may be a useful additive antioxidant for sunscreens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7078816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70788162020-03-19 High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo Mann, Tobias Eggers, Kerstin Rippke, Frank Tesch, Mirko Buerger, Anette Darvin, Maxim E. Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Lademann, Jürgen Kolbe, Ludger Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed Original Articles BACKGROUND: Solar radiation causes skin damage through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While UV filters effectively reduce UV‐induced ROS, they cannot prevent VIS‐induced (400‐760 nm) oxidative stress. Therefore, potent antioxidants are needed as additives to sunscreen products. METHODS: We investigated VIS‐induced ROS formation and the photoprotective effects of the Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A (LicA). RESULTS: Visible spectrum of 400‐500 nm dose‐dependently induced ROS in cultured human fibroblasts at doses equivalent to 1 hour of sunshine on a sunny summer day (150 J/cm(2)). A pretreatment for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L LicA reduced ROS formation to the level of unirradiated cells while UV filters alone were ineffective, even at SPF50+. In vivo, topical treatment with a LicA‐containing SPF50 + formulation significantly prevented the depletion of intradermal carotenoids by VIS irradiation while SPF50 + control did not protect. CONCLUSION: LicA may be a useful additive antioxidant for sunscreens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-17 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7078816/ /pubmed/31661571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mann, Tobias Eggers, Kerstin Rippke, Frank Tesch, Mirko Buerger, Anette Darvin, Maxim E. Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Lademann, Jürgen Kolbe, Ludger High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title | High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title_full | High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title_fullStr | High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title_short | High‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—Protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in vivo |
title_sort | high‐energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—protective effects of the antioxidant and nrf2 inducer licochalcone a in vitro and in vivo |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manntobias highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT eggerskerstin highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT rippkefrank highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT teschmirko highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT buergeranette highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT darvinmaxime highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT schanzersabine highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT meinkemartinac highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT lademannjurgen highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo AT kolbeludger highenergyvisiblelightatambientdosesandintensitiesinducesoxidativestressofskinprotectiveeffectsoftheantioxidantandnrf2inducerlicochalconeainvitroandinvivo |