Cargando…

From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff

Metabarcoding is by now a well‐established method for biodiversity assessment in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. Metabarcoding data sets are usually used for α‐ and β‐diversity estimates, that is, interspecies (or inter‐MOTU [molecular operational taxonomic unit]) patterns. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turon, Xavier, Antich, Adrià, Palacín, Creu, Præbel, Kim, Wangensteen, Owen Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2036
_version_ 1783507715467771904
author Turon, Xavier
Antich, Adrià
Palacín, Creu
Præbel, Kim
Wangensteen, Owen Simon
author_facet Turon, Xavier
Antich, Adrià
Palacín, Creu
Præbel, Kim
Wangensteen, Owen Simon
author_sort Turon, Xavier
collection PubMed
description Metabarcoding is by now a well‐established method for biodiversity assessment in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. Metabarcoding data sets are usually used for α‐ and β‐diversity estimates, that is, interspecies (or inter‐MOTU [molecular operational taxonomic unit]) patterns. However, the use of hypervariable metabarcoding markers may provide an enormous amount of intraspecies (intra‐MOTU) information—mostly untapped so far. The use of cytochrome oxidase (COI) amplicons is gaining momentum in metabarcoding studies targeting eukaryote richness. COI has been for a long time the marker of choice in population genetics and phylogeographic studies. Therefore, COI metabarcoding data sets may be used to study intraspecies patterns and phylogeographic features for hundreds of species simultaneously, opening a new field that we suggest to name metaphylogeography. The main challenge for the implementation of this approach is the separation of erroneous sequences from true intra‐MOTU variation. Here, we develop a cleaning protocol based on changes in entropy of the different codon positions of the COI sequence, together with co‐occurrence patterns of sequences. Using a data set of community DNA from several benthic littoral communities in the Mediterranean and Atlantic seas, we first tested by simulation on a subset of sequences a two‐step cleaning approach consisting of a denoising step followed by a minimal abundance filtering. The procedure was then applied to the whole data set. We obtained a total of 563 MOTUs that were usable for phylogeographic inference. We used semiquantitative rank data instead of read abundances to perform AMOVAs and haplotype networks. Genetic variability was mainly concentrated within samples, but with an important between seas component as well. There were intergroup differences in the amount of variability between and within communities in each sea. For two species, the results could be compared with traditional Sanger sequence data available for the same zones, giving similar patterns. Our study shows that metabarcoding data can be used to infer intra‐ and interpopulation genetic variability of many species at a time, providing a new method with great potential for basic biogeography, connectivity and dispersal studies, and for the more applied fields of conservation genetics, invasion genetics, and design of protected areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7078904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70789042020-03-19 From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff Turon, Xavier Antich, Adrià Palacín, Creu Præbel, Kim Wangensteen, Owen Simon Ecol Appl Articles Metabarcoding is by now a well‐established method for biodiversity assessment in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. Metabarcoding data sets are usually used for α‐ and β‐diversity estimates, that is, interspecies (or inter‐MOTU [molecular operational taxonomic unit]) patterns. However, the use of hypervariable metabarcoding markers may provide an enormous amount of intraspecies (intra‐MOTU) information—mostly untapped so far. The use of cytochrome oxidase (COI) amplicons is gaining momentum in metabarcoding studies targeting eukaryote richness. COI has been for a long time the marker of choice in population genetics and phylogeographic studies. Therefore, COI metabarcoding data sets may be used to study intraspecies patterns and phylogeographic features for hundreds of species simultaneously, opening a new field that we suggest to name metaphylogeography. The main challenge for the implementation of this approach is the separation of erroneous sequences from true intra‐MOTU variation. Here, we develop a cleaning protocol based on changes in entropy of the different codon positions of the COI sequence, together with co‐occurrence patterns of sequences. Using a data set of community DNA from several benthic littoral communities in the Mediterranean and Atlantic seas, we first tested by simulation on a subset of sequences a two‐step cleaning approach consisting of a denoising step followed by a minimal abundance filtering. The procedure was then applied to the whole data set. We obtained a total of 563 MOTUs that were usable for phylogeographic inference. We used semiquantitative rank data instead of read abundances to perform AMOVAs and haplotype networks. Genetic variability was mainly concentrated within samples, but with an important between seas component as well. There were intergroup differences in the amount of variability between and within communities in each sea. For two species, the results could be compared with traditional Sanger sequence data available for the same zones, giving similar patterns. Our study shows that metabarcoding data can be used to infer intra‐ and interpopulation genetic variability of many species at a time, providing a new method with great potential for basic biogeography, connectivity and dispersal studies, and for the more applied fields of conservation genetics, invasion genetics, and design of protected areas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-11 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7078904/ /pubmed/31709684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2036 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Turon, Xavier
Antich, Adrià
Palacín, Creu
Præbel, Kim
Wangensteen, Owen Simon
From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title_full From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title_fullStr From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title_full_unstemmed From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title_short From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
title_sort from metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31709684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2036
work_keys_str_mv AT turonxavier frommetabarcodingtometaphylogeographyseparatingthewheatfromthechaff
AT antichadria frommetabarcodingtometaphylogeographyseparatingthewheatfromthechaff
AT palacincreu frommetabarcodingtometaphylogeographyseparatingthewheatfromthechaff
AT præbelkim frommetabarcodingtometaphylogeographyseparatingthewheatfromthechaff
AT wangensteenowensimon frommetabarcodingtometaphylogeographyseparatingthewheatfromthechaff