Cargando…
Extensions of the probabilistic ranking metrics of competing treatments in network meta‐analysis to reflect clinically important relative differences on many outcomes
One of the key features of network meta‐analysis is ranking of interventions according to outcomes of interest. Ranking metrics are prone to misinterpretation because of two limitations associated with the current ranking methods. First, differences in relative treatment effects might not be clinica...
Autores principales: | Mavridis, Dimitris, Porcher, Raphaël, Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, Salanti, Georgia, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7078966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900026 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Agreement between ranking metrics in network meta-analysis: an empirical study
por: Chiocchia, Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Answering complex hierarchy questions in network meta-analysis
por: Papakonstantinou, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Estimating the sample size of sham-controlled randomized controlled trials using existing evidence
por: Siontis, George C.M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Introducing the Treatment Hierarchy Question in Network Meta-Analysis
por: Salanti, Georgia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)