Cargando…

One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage

A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an ext...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Christopher G. P., Argent, Stephen P., Ludden, Michael D., Piper, Jerico R., Mozaceanu, Cristina, Barnett, Sarah A., Ward, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499
_version_ 1783507746080948224
author Taylor, Christopher G. P.
Argent, Stephen P.
Ludden, Michael D.
Piper, Jerico R.
Mozaceanu, Cristina
Barnett, Sarah A.
Ward, Michael D.
author_facet Taylor, Christopher G. P.
Argent, Stephen P.
Ludden, Michael D.
Piper, Jerico R.
Mozaceanu, Cristina
Barnett, Sarah A.
Ward, Michael D.
author_sort Taylor, Christopher G. P.
collection PubMed
description A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an extensive family of bicyclic guests—including some substituted coumarins and various saturated analogues—form 1:2 H⋅G(2) complexes in the solid state, despite the fact that solution titrations are consistent with 1:1 complex formation, and the combined volume of the pair of guests significantly exceeds the Rebek 55±9 % packing for optimal guest binding, with packing coefficients of up to 87 %. Re‐examination of solution titration data for guest binding in two cases showed that, although conventional fluorescence titrations are consistent with 1:1 binding model, alternative forms of analysis—Job plot and an NMR titration—at higher concentrations do provide evidence for 1:2 H⋅G(2) complex formation. The observation of guests binding in pairs in some cases opens new possibilities for altered reactivity of bound guests, and also highlights the recently articulated difficulties associated with determining stoichiometry of supramolecular complexes in solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70790402020-03-19 One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage Taylor, Christopher G. P. Argent, Stephen P. Ludden, Michael D. Piper, Jerico R. Mozaceanu, Cristina Barnett, Sarah A. Ward, Michael D. Chemistry Full Papers A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an extensive family of bicyclic guests—including some substituted coumarins and various saturated analogues—form 1:2 H⋅G(2) complexes in the solid state, despite the fact that solution titrations are consistent with 1:1 complex formation, and the combined volume of the pair of guests significantly exceeds the Rebek 55±9 % packing for optimal guest binding, with packing coefficients of up to 87 %. Re‐examination of solution titration data for guest binding in two cases showed that, although conventional fluorescence titrations are consistent with 1:1 binding model, alternative forms of analysis—Job plot and an NMR titration—at higher concentrations do provide evidence for 1:2 H⋅G(2) complex formation. The observation of guests binding in pairs in some cases opens new possibilities for altered reactivity of bound guests, and also highlights the recently articulated difficulties associated with determining stoichiometry of supramolecular complexes in solution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-06 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7079040/ /pubmed/31816132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Taylor, Christopher G. P.
Argent, Stephen P.
Ludden, Michael D.
Piper, Jerico R.
Mozaceanu, Cristina
Barnett, Sarah A.
Ward, Michael D.
One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title_full One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title_fullStr One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title_full_unstemmed One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title_short One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
title_sort one guest or two? a crystallographic and solution study of guest binding in a cubic coordination cage
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorchristophergp oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT argentstephenp oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT luddenmichaeld oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT piperjericor oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT mozaceanucristina oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT barnettsaraha oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage
AT wardmichaeld oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage