Cargando…
One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage
A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an ext...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499 |
_version_ | 1783507746080948224 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Christopher G. P. Argent, Stephen P. Ludden, Michael D. Piper, Jerico R. Mozaceanu, Cristina Barnett, Sarah A. Ward, Michael D. |
author_facet | Taylor, Christopher G. P. Argent, Stephen P. Ludden, Michael D. Piper, Jerico R. Mozaceanu, Cristina Barnett, Sarah A. Ward, Michael D. |
author_sort | Taylor, Christopher G. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an extensive family of bicyclic guests—including some substituted coumarins and various saturated analogues—form 1:2 H⋅G(2) complexes in the solid state, despite the fact that solution titrations are consistent with 1:1 complex formation, and the combined volume of the pair of guests significantly exceeds the Rebek 55±9 % packing for optimal guest binding, with packing coefficients of up to 87 %. Re‐examination of solution titration data for guest binding in two cases showed that, although conventional fluorescence titrations are consistent with 1:1 binding model, alternative forms of analysis—Job plot and an NMR titration—at higher concentrations do provide evidence for 1:2 H⋅G(2) complex formation. The observation of guests binding in pairs in some cases opens new possibilities for altered reactivity of bound guests, and also highlights the recently articulated difficulties associated with determining stoichiometry of supramolecular complexes in solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7079040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70790402020-03-19 One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage Taylor, Christopher G. P. Argent, Stephen P. Ludden, Michael D. Piper, Jerico R. Mozaceanu, Cristina Barnett, Sarah A. Ward, Michael D. Chemistry Full Papers A crystallographic investigation of a series of host–guest complexes in which small‐molecule organic guests occupy the central cavity of an approximately cubic M(8)L(12) coordination cage has revealed some unexpected behaviour. Whilst some guests form 1:1 H⋅G complexes as we have seen before, an extensive family of bicyclic guests—including some substituted coumarins and various saturated analogues—form 1:2 H⋅G(2) complexes in the solid state, despite the fact that solution titrations are consistent with 1:1 complex formation, and the combined volume of the pair of guests significantly exceeds the Rebek 55±9 % packing for optimal guest binding, with packing coefficients of up to 87 %. Re‐examination of solution titration data for guest binding in two cases showed that, although conventional fluorescence titrations are consistent with 1:1 binding model, alternative forms of analysis—Job plot and an NMR titration—at higher concentrations do provide evidence for 1:2 H⋅G(2) complex formation. The observation of guests binding in pairs in some cases opens new possibilities for altered reactivity of bound guests, and also highlights the recently articulated difficulties associated with determining stoichiometry of supramolecular complexes in solution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-06 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7079040/ /pubmed/31816132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Taylor, Christopher G. P. Argent, Stephen P. Ludden, Michael D. Piper, Jerico R. Mozaceanu, Cristina Barnett, Sarah A. Ward, Michael D. One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title | One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title_full | One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title_fullStr | One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title_full_unstemmed | One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title_short | One Guest or Two? A Crystallographic and Solution Study of Guest Binding in a Cubic Coordination Cage |
title_sort | one guest or two? a crystallographic and solution study of guest binding in a cubic coordination cage |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31816132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201905499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorchristophergp oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT argentstephenp oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT luddenmichaeld oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT piperjericor oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT mozaceanucristina oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT barnettsaraha oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage AT wardmichaeld oneguestortwoacrystallographicandsolutionstudyofguestbindinginacubiccoordinationcage |