Cargando…

A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker

Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dandis, Rana, Teerenstra, Steven, Massuger, Leon, Sweep, Fred, Eysbouts, Yalck, IntHout, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044
_version_ 1783507746999500800
author Dandis, Rana
Teerenstra, Steven
Massuger, Leon
Sweep, Fred
Eysbouts, Yalck
IntHout, Joanna
author_facet Dandis, Rana
Teerenstra, Steven
Massuger, Leon
Sweep, Fred
Eysbouts, Yalck
IntHout, Joanna
author_sort Dandis, Rana
collection PubMed
description Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a repeatedly measured biomarker. The aim of this study is to give an illustrative overview of four approaches to obtain such predictions: likelihood based two‐stage method (2SMLE), likelihood based joint model (JMMLE), Bayesian two‐stage method (2SB), and Bayesian joint model (JMB). We applied the approaches to provide weekly updated predictions of post–molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) based on age and repeated measurements of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Discrimination and calibration measures were used to compare the accuracy of the weekly predictions. Internal validation of the models was conducted using bootstrapping. The four approaches resulted in the same predictive and discriminative performance in predicting GTN. A simulation study showed that the joint models outperform the two‐stage methods when we increase the within‐ and the between‐patients variability of the biomarker. The applicability of these models to produce dynamic predictions has been illustrated through a comprehensive explanation and accompanying syntax (R and SAS(®)).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70790442020-03-19 A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker Dandis, Rana Teerenstra, Steven Massuger, Leon Sweep, Fred Eysbouts, Yalck IntHout, Joanna Biom J Research Papers Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a repeatedly measured biomarker. The aim of this study is to give an illustrative overview of four approaches to obtain such predictions: likelihood based two‐stage method (2SMLE), likelihood based joint model (JMMLE), Bayesian two‐stage method (2SB), and Bayesian joint model (JMB). We applied the approaches to provide weekly updated predictions of post–molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) based on age and repeated measurements of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Discrimination and calibration measures were used to compare the accuracy of the weekly predictions. Internal validation of the models was conducted using bootstrapping. The four approaches resulted in the same predictive and discriminative performance in predicting GTN. A simulation study showed that the joint models outperform the two‐stage methods when we increase the within‐ and the between‐patients variability of the biomarker. The applicability of these models to produce dynamic predictions has been illustrated through a comprehensive explanation and accompanying syntax (R and SAS(®)). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-28 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7079044/ /pubmed/31777998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Biometrical Journal published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Dandis, Rana
Teerenstra, Steven
Massuger, Leon
Sweep, Fred
Eysbouts, Yalck
IntHout, Joanna
A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title_full A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title_fullStr A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title_full_unstemmed A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title_short A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
title_sort tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044
work_keys_str_mv AT dandisrana atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT teerenstrasteven atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT massugerleon atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT sweepfred atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT eysboutsyalck atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT inthoutjoanna atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT dandisrana tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT teerenstrasteven tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT massugerleon tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT sweepfred tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT eysboutsyalck tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker
AT inthoutjoanna tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker