Cargando…
A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044 |
_version_ | 1783507746999500800 |
---|---|
author | Dandis, Rana Teerenstra, Steven Massuger, Leon Sweep, Fred Eysbouts, Yalck IntHout, Joanna |
author_facet | Dandis, Rana Teerenstra, Steven Massuger, Leon Sweep, Fred Eysbouts, Yalck IntHout, Joanna |
author_sort | Dandis, Rana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a repeatedly measured biomarker. The aim of this study is to give an illustrative overview of four approaches to obtain such predictions: likelihood based two‐stage method (2SMLE), likelihood based joint model (JMMLE), Bayesian two‐stage method (2SB), and Bayesian joint model (JMB). We applied the approaches to provide weekly updated predictions of post–molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) based on age and repeated measurements of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Discrimination and calibration measures were used to compare the accuracy of the weekly predictions. Internal validation of the models was conducted using bootstrapping. The four approaches resulted in the same predictive and discriminative performance in predicting GTN. A simulation study showed that the joint models outperform the two‐stage methods when we increase the within‐ and the between‐patients variability of the biomarker. The applicability of these models to produce dynamic predictions has been illustrated through a comprehensive explanation and accompanying syntax (R and SAS(®)). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7079044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70790442020-03-19 A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker Dandis, Rana Teerenstra, Steven Massuger, Leon Sweep, Fred Eysbouts, Yalck IntHout, Joanna Biom J Research Papers Dynamic risk predictions based on all available information are useful in timely identification of high‐risk patients. However, in contrast with time to event outcomes, there is still a lack of studies that clearly demonstrate how to obtain and update predictions for a future binary outcome using a repeatedly measured biomarker. The aim of this study is to give an illustrative overview of four approaches to obtain such predictions: likelihood based two‐stage method (2SMLE), likelihood based joint model (JMMLE), Bayesian two‐stage method (2SB), and Bayesian joint model (JMB). We applied the approaches to provide weekly updated predictions of post–molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) based on age and repeated measurements of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Discrimination and calibration measures were used to compare the accuracy of the weekly predictions. Internal validation of the models was conducted using bootstrapping. The four approaches resulted in the same predictive and discriminative performance in predicting GTN. A simulation study showed that the joint models outperform the two‐stage methods when we increase the within‐ and the between‐patients variability of the biomarker. The applicability of these models to produce dynamic predictions has been illustrated through a comprehensive explanation and accompanying syntax (R and SAS(®)). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-28 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7079044/ /pubmed/31777998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Biometrical Journal published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Dandis, Rana Teerenstra, Steven Massuger, Leon Sweep, Fred Eysbouts, Yalck IntHout, Joanna A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title | A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title_full | A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title_fullStr | A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title_full_unstemmed | A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title_short | A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
title_sort | tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201900044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dandisrana atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT teerenstrasteven atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT massugerleon atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT sweepfred atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT eysboutsyalck atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT inthoutjoanna atutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT dandisrana tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT teerenstrasteven tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT massugerleon tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT sweepfred tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT eysboutsyalck tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker AT inthoutjoanna tutorialondynamicriskpredictionofabinaryoutcomebasedonalongitudinalbiomarker |