Cargando…

Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images

PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Qing, Broersen, Alexander, Kitslaar, Pieter H., Yuan, Mingyuan, Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F., Dijkstra, Jouke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993
_version_ 1783507755081924608
author Cao, Qing
Broersen, Alexander
Kitslaar, Pieter H.
Yuan, Mingyuan
Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F.
Dijkstra, Jouke
author_facet Cao, Qing
Broersen, Alexander
Kitslaar, Pieter H.
Yuan, Mingyuan
Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F.
Dijkstra, Jouke
author_sort Cao, Qing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS: We model the lumen and vessel wall for both the baseline coronary artery tree (CAT‐BL) and follow‐up coronary artery tree (CAT‐FU) as smooth three‐dimensional (3D) surfaces using a subdivision fitting scheme with the same coarse meshes by which the correspondence among these surface points is generated. Specifically, a rigid point set registration is used to transform the coarse mesh from the CAT‐FU to CAT‐BL. The plaque thickness and the thickness difference is calculated as the distance between corresponding surface points. To evaluate the registration accuracy, the average distance between manually defined markers on clinical scans is calculated. Artificial CAT‐BL and CAT‐FU pairs were created to simulate the plaque decrease and increase over time. RESULTS: For 116 pairs of markers from nine clinical scans, the average marker distance after registration was 0.95 ± 0.98 mm (two times the voxel size). On the 10 artificial pairs of datasets, the proposed method successfully located the plaque changes. The average of the calculated plaque thickness difference is the same as the corresponding created value (standard deviation ± 0.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method automatically calculates local coronary plaque thickness differences over time and can be used for 3D visualization of plaque differences. The analysis and reporting of coronary plaque progression and regression will benefit from an automatic plaque thickness comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70790782020-03-19 Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images Cao, Qing Broersen, Alexander Kitslaar, Pieter H. Yuan, Mingyuan Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F. Dijkstra, Jouke Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS: We model the lumen and vessel wall for both the baseline coronary artery tree (CAT‐BL) and follow‐up coronary artery tree (CAT‐FU) as smooth three‐dimensional (3D) surfaces using a subdivision fitting scheme with the same coarse meshes by which the correspondence among these surface points is generated. Specifically, a rigid point set registration is used to transform the coarse mesh from the CAT‐FU to CAT‐BL. The plaque thickness and the thickness difference is calculated as the distance between corresponding surface points. To evaluate the registration accuracy, the average distance between manually defined markers on clinical scans is calculated. Artificial CAT‐BL and CAT‐FU pairs were created to simulate the plaque decrease and increase over time. RESULTS: For 116 pairs of markers from nine clinical scans, the average marker distance after registration was 0.95 ± 0.98 mm (two times the voxel size). On the 10 artificial pairs of datasets, the proposed method successfully located the plaque changes. The average of the calculated plaque thickness difference is the same as the corresponding created value (standard deviation ± 0.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method automatically calculates local coronary plaque thickness differences over time and can be used for 3D visualization of plaque differences. The analysis and reporting of coronary plaque progression and regression will benefit from an automatic plaque thickness comparison. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-20 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7079078/ /pubmed/31883122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Cao, Qing
Broersen, Alexander
Kitslaar, Pieter H.
Yuan, Mingyuan
Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F.
Dijkstra, Jouke
Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title_full Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title_fullStr Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title_full_unstemmed Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title_short Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
title_sort automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up ccta images
topic QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993
work_keys_str_mv AT caoqing automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages
AT broersenalexander automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages
AT kitslaarpieterh automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages
AT yuanmingyuan automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages
AT lelieveldtboudewijnpf automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages
AT dijkstrajouke automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages