Cargando…
Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images
PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993 |
_version_ | 1783507755081924608 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Qing Broersen, Alexander Kitslaar, Pieter H. Yuan, Mingyuan Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F. Dijkstra, Jouke |
author_facet | Cao, Qing Broersen, Alexander Kitslaar, Pieter H. Yuan, Mingyuan Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F. Dijkstra, Jouke |
author_sort | Cao, Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS: We model the lumen and vessel wall for both the baseline coronary artery tree (CAT‐BL) and follow‐up coronary artery tree (CAT‐FU) as smooth three‐dimensional (3D) surfaces using a subdivision fitting scheme with the same coarse meshes by which the correspondence among these surface points is generated. Specifically, a rigid point set registration is used to transform the coarse mesh from the CAT‐FU to CAT‐BL. The plaque thickness and the thickness difference is calculated as the distance between corresponding surface points. To evaluate the registration accuracy, the average distance between manually defined markers on clinical scans is calculated. Artificial CAT‐BL and CAT‐FU pairs were created to simulate the plaque decrease and increase over time. RESULTS: For 116 pairs of markers from nine clinical scans, the average marker distance after registration was 0.95 ± 0.98 mm (two times the voxel size). On the 10 artificial pairs of datasets, the proposed method successfully located the plaque changes. The average of the calculated plaque thickness difference is the same as the corresponding created value (standard deviation ± 0.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method automatically calculates local coronary plaque thickness differences over time and can be used for 3D visualization of plaque differences. The analysis and reporting of coronary plaque progression and regression will benefit from an automatic plaque thickness comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7079078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70790782020-03-19 Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images Cao, Qing Broersen, Alexander Kitslaar, Pieter H. Yuan, Mingyuan Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F. Dijkstra, Jouke Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: Currently, coronary plaque changes are manually compared between a baseline and follow‐up coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images for long‐term coronary plaque development investigation. We propose an automatic method to measure the plaque thickness change over time. METHODS: We model the lumen and vessel wall for both the baseline coronary artery tree (CAT‐BL) and follow‐up coronary artery tree (CAT‐FU) as smooth three‐dimensional (3D) surfaces using a subdivision fitting scheme with the same coarse meshes by which the correspondence among these surface points is generated. Specifically, a rigid point set registration is used to transform the coarse mesh from the CAT‐FU to CAT‐BL. The plaque thickness and the thickness difference is calculated as the distance between corresponding surface points. To evaluate the registration accuracy, the average distance between manually defined markers on clinical scans is calculated. Artificial CAT‐BL and CAT‐FU pairs were created to simulate the plaque decrease and increase over time. RESULTS: For 116 pairs of markers from nine clinical scans, the average marker distance after registration was 0.95 ± 0.98 mm (two times the voxel size). On the 10 artificial pairs of datasets, the proposed method successfully located the plaque changes. The average of the calculated plaque thickness difference is the same as the corresponding created value (standard deviation ± 0.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method automatically calculates local coronary plaque thickness differences over time and can be used for 3D visualization of plaque differences. The analysis and reporting of coronary plaque progression and regression will benefit from an automatic plaque thickness comparison. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-20 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7079078/ /pubmed/31883122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING Cao, Qing Broersen, Alexander Kitslaar, Pieter H. Yuan, Mingyuan Lelieveldt, Boudewijn P. F. Dijkstra, Jouke Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title | Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title_full | Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title_fullStr | Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title_short | Automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up CCTA images |
title_sort | automatic coronary artery plaque thickness comparison between baseline and follow‐up ccta images |
topic | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoqing automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages AT broersenalexander automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages AT kitslaarpieterh automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages AT yuanmingyuan automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages AT lelieveldtboudewijnpf automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages AT dijkstrajouke automaticcoronaryarteryplaquethicknesscomparisonbetweenbaselineandfollowupcctaimages |