Cargando…

Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology

To limit warming to well below 2°C, most scenario projections rely on greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land. In addition to their role in mitigating climate change, SCS practices play a role in delivering agroecosystem re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sykes, Alasdair J., Macleod, Michael, Eory, Vera, Rees, Robert M., Payen, Florian, Myrgiotis, Vasilis, Williams, Mathew, Sohi, Saran, Hillier, Jon, Moran, Dominic, Manning, David A. C., Goglio, Pietro, Seghetta, Michele, Williams, Adrian, Harris, Jim, Dondini, Marta, Walton, Jack, House, Joanna, Smith, Pete
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14844
_version_ 1783507756744966144
author Sykes, Alasdair J.
Macleod, Michael
Eory, Vera
Rees, Robert M.
Payen, Florian
Myrgiotis, Vasilis
Williams, Mathew
Sohi, Saran
Hillier, Jon
Moran, Dominic
Manning, David A. C.
Goglio, Pietro
Seghetta, Michele
Williams, Adrian
Harris, Jim
Dondini, Marta
Walton, Jack
House, Joanna
Smith, Pete
author_facet Sykes, Alasdair J.
Macleod, Michael
Eory, Vera
Rees, Robert M.
Payen, Florian
Myrgiotis, Vasilis
Williams, Mathew
Sohi, Saran
Hillier, Jon
Moran, Dominic
Manning, David A. C.
Goglio, Pietro
Seghetta, Michele
Williams, Adrian
Harris, Jim
Dondini, Marta
Walton, Jack
House, Joanna
Smith, Pete
author_sort Sykes, Alasdair J.
collection PubMed
description To limit warming to well below 2°C, most scenario projections rely on greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land. In addition to their role in mitigating climate change, SCS practices play a role in delivering agroecosystem resilience, climate change adaptability and food security. Environmental heterogeneity and differences in agricultural practices challenge the practical implementation of SCS, and our analysis addresses the associated knowledge gap. Previous assessments have focused on global potentials, but there is a need among policymakers to operationalise SCS. Here, we assess a range of practices already proposed to deliver SCS, and distil these into a subset of specific measures. We provide a multidisciplinary summary of the barriers and potential incentives towards practical implementation of these measures. First, we identify specific practices with potential for both a positive impact on SCS at farm level and an uptake rate compatible with global impact. These focus on: (a) optimising crop primary productivity (e.g. nutrient optimisation, pH management, irrigation); (b) reducing soil disturbance and managing soil physical properties (e.g. improved rotations, minimum till); (c) minimising deliberate removal of C or lateral transport via erosion processes (e.g. support measures, bare fallow reduction); (d) addition of C produced outside the system (e.g. organic manure amendments, biochar addition); (e) provision of additional C inputs within the cropping system (e.g. agroforestry, cover cropping). We then consider economic and non‐cost barriers and incentives for land managers implementing these measures, along with the potential externalised impacts of implementation. This offers a framework and reference point for holistic assessment of the impacts of SCS. Finally, we summarise and discuss the ability of extant scientific approaches to quantify the technical potential and externalities of SCS measures, and the barriers and incentives to their implementation in global agricultural systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70790852020-03-19 Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology Sykes, Alasdair J. Macleod, Michael Eory, Vera Rees, Robert M. Payen, Florian Myrgiotis, Vasilis Williams, Mathew Sohi, Saran Hillier, Jon Moran, Dominic Manning, David A. C. Goglio, Pietro Seghetta, Michele Williams, Adrian Harris, Jim Dondini, Marta Walton, Jack House, Joanna Smith, Pete Glob Chang Biol Research Reviews To limit warming to well below 2°C, most scenario projections rely on greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs); one such GGRT uses soil carbon sequestration (SCS) in agricultural land. In addition to their role in mitigating climate change, SCS practices play a role in delivering agroecosystem resilience, climate change adaptability and food security. Environmental heterogeneity and differences in agricultural practices challenge the practical implementation of SCS, and our analysis addresses the associated knowledge gap. Previous assessments have focused on global potentials, but there is a need among policymakers to operationalise SCS. Here, we assess a range of practices already proposed to deliver SCS, and distil these into a subset of specific measures. We provide a multidisciplinary summary of the barriers and potential incentives towards practical implementation of these measures. First, we identify specific practices with potential for both a positive impact on SCS at farm level and an uptake rate compatible with global impact. These focus on: (a) optimising crop primary productivity (e.g. nutrient optimisation, pH management, irrigation); (b) reducing soil disturbance and managing soil physical properties (e.g. improved rotations, minimum till); (c) minimising deliberate removal of C or lateral transport via erosion processes (e.g. support measures, bare fallow reduction); (d) addition of C produced outside the system (e.g. organic manure amendments, biochar addition); (e) provision of additional C inputs within the cropping system (e.g. agroforestry, cover cropping). We then consider economic and non‐cost barriers and incentives for land managers implementing these measures, along with the potential externalised impacts of implementation. This offers a framework and reference point for holistic assessment of the impacts of SCS. Finally, we summarise and discuss the ability of extant scientific approaches to quantify the technical potential and externalities of SCS measures, and the barriers and incentives to their implementation in global agricultural systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-26 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7079085/ /pubmed/31532049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14844 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reviews
Sykes, Alasdair J.
Macleod, Michael
Eory, Vera
Rees, Robert M.
Payen, Florian
Myrgiotis, Vasilis
Williams, Mathew
Sohi, Saran
Hillier, Jon
Moran, Dominic
Manning, David A. C.
Goglio, Pietro
Seghetta, Michele
Williams, Adrian
Harris, Jim
Dondini, Marta
Walton, Jack
House, Joanna
Smith, Pete
Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title_full Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title_fullStr Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title_full_unstemmed Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title_short Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
title_sort characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology
topic Research Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14844
work_keys_str_mv AT sykesalasdairj characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT macleodmichael characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT eoryvera characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT reesrobertm characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT payenflorian characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT myrgiotisvasilis characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT williamsmathew characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT sohisaran characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT hillierjon characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT morandominic characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT manningdavidac characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT gogliopietro characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT seghettamichele characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT williamsadrian characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT harrisjim characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT dondinimarta characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT waltonjack characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT housejoanna characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology
AT smithpete characterisingthebiophysicaleconomicandsocialimpactsofsoilcarbonsequestrationasagreenhousegasremovaltechnology