Cargando…

Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

BACKGROUND: The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians’ and patients’ satisfaction. However, this communication is o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaioli, Giacomo, Schäfer, Willemijn L. A., Boerma, Wienke G. W., Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M., Schellevis, François G., Groenewegen, Peter P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x
_version_ 1783507803297546240
author Scaioli, Giacomo
Schäfer, Willemijn L. A.
Boerma, Wienke G. W.
Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M.
Schellevis, François G.
Groenewegen, Peter P.
author_facet Scaioli, Giacomo
Schäfer, Willemijn L. A.
Boerma, Wienke G. W.
Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M.
Schellevis, François G.
Groenewegen, Peter P.
author_sort Scaioli, Giacomo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians’ and patients’ satisfaction. However, this communication is often not carried out properly. The objective of this study is to assess whether communication between GPs and medical specialists in the referral process is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, the characteristics of the GPs, and the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves. METHODS: An analysis of a cross-sectional survey among GPs in 34 countries was conducted. The odds ratios of the features that were expected to relate to higher rates of referral letters sent and communications fed back to GPs were calculated using ordered logistic multilevel models. RESULTS: A total of 7183 GPs from 34 countries were surveyed. Variations between countries in referral letters sent and feedback communication received did occur. Little of the variance between countries could be explained. GPs stated that they send more referral letters, and receive more feedback communications from medical specialists, in countries where they act as gatekeepers, and when, in general, they interact more with specialists. GPs reported higher use of referral letters when they had a secretary and/or a nurse in their practice, used health information technologies, and had greater job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: There are large differences in communication between GPs and medical specialists. These differences can partly be explained by characteristics of the country, the GP and the primary care practice. Further studies should also take the organisation of secondary care into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70793512020-03-23 Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries Scaioli, Giacomo Schäfer, Willemijn L. A. Boerma, Wienke G. W. Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M. Schellevis, François G. Groenewegen, Peter P. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The communication of relevant patient information between general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists is important in order to avoid fragmentation of care thus achieving a higher quality of care and ensuring physicians’ and patients’ satisfaction. However, this communication is often not carried out properly. The objective of this study is to assess whether communication between GPs and medical specialists in the referral process is associated with the organisation of primary care within a country, the characteristics of the GPs, and the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves. METHODS: An analysis of a cross-sectional survey among GPs in 34 countries was conducted. The odds ratios of the features that were expected to relate to higher rates of referral letters sent and communications fed back to GPs were calculated using ordered logistic multilevel models. RESULTS: A total of 7183 GPs from 34 countries were surveyed. Variations between countries in referral letters sent and feedback communication received did occur. Little of the variance between countries could be explained. GPs stated that they send more referral letters, and receive more feedback communications from medical specialists, in countries where they act as gatekeepers, and when, in general, they interact more with specialists. GPs reported higher use of referral letters when they had a secretary and/or a nurse in their practice, used health information technologies, and had greater job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: There are large differences in communication between GPs and medical specialists. These differences can partly be explained by characteristics of the country, the GP and the primary care practice. Further studies should also take the organisation of secondary care into account. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7079351/ /pubmed/32183771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scaioli, Giacomo
Schäfer, Willemijn L. A.
Boerma, Wienke G. W.
Spreeuwenberg, Peter M. M.
Schellevis, François G.
Groenewegen, Peter P.
Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title_full Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title_fullStr Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title_full_unstemmed Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title_short Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
title_sort communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x
work_keys_str_mv AT scaioligiacomo communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries
AT schaferwillemijnla communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries
AT boermawienkegw communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries
AT spreeuwenbergpetermm communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries
AT schellevisfrancoisg communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries
AT groenewegenpeterp communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandmedicalspecialistsinthereferralprocessacrosssectionalsurveyin34countries