Cargando…

Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population

BACKGROUND: The conventional way to identify generalised joint hypermobility is by a physical examination according to the Beighton Score. However, a physical examination is time-consuming in clinical practise and may be unfeasible in population-based studies. The self-assessment five-part questionn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glans, Martin, Humble, Mats B., Elwin, Marie, Bejerot, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3067-1
_version_ 1783507818829053952
author Glans, Martin
Humble, Mats B.
Elwin, Marie
Bejerot, Susanne
author_facet Glans, Martin
Humble, Mats B.
Elwin, Marie
Bejerot, Susanne
author_sort Glans, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The conventional way to identify generalised joint hypermobility is by a physical examination according to the Beighton Score. However, a physical examination is time-consuming in clinical practise and may be unfeasible in population-based studies. The self-assessment five-part questionnaire on hypermobility (5PQ) offers a more practicable way to identify GJH. The aim of this study was to test validity and reliability of the five-part questionnaire on hypermobility (5PQ) translated into Swedish on a non-clinical adult population. METHODS: A structured procedure was used for the translation of the 5PQ into Swedish. The Beighton Score was used as reference standard for generalised joint hypermobility. Test-retest reliability was tested in a separate group who filled in the questionnaire twice with a ten-week interval. Participants consisted of a convenience sample recruited in Stockholm, Sweden (2017). RESULTS: A total of 328 participants were included in the study, 297 participants in the validity group and 31 participants in the reliability group. When evaluated against a present Beighton Score with an age-dependent cut-off, the Swedish 5PQ attained a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 75% and an area under the curve of 0.87. The Swedish 5PQ showed substantial to almost perfect test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish 5PQ is a valid and reliable instrument to screen for or to identify generalised joint hypermobility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70794172020-03-23 Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population Glans, Martin Humble, Mats B. Elwin, Marie Bejerot, Susanne BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The conventional way to identify generalised joint hypermobility is by a physical examination according to the Beighton Score. However, a physical examination is time-consuming in clinical practise and may be unfeasible in population-based studies. The self-assessment five-part questionnaire on hypermobility (5PQ) offers a more practicable way to identify GJH. The aim of this study was to test validity and reliability of the five-part questionnaire on hypermobility (5PQ) translated into Swedish on a non-clinical adult population. METHODS: A structured procedure was used for the translation of the 5PQ into Swedish. The Beighton Score was used as reference standard for generalised joint hypermobility. Test-retest reliability was tested in a separate group who filled in the questionnaire twice with a ten-week interval. Participants consisted of a convenience sample recruited in Stockholm, Sweden (2017). RESULTS: A total of 328 participants were included in the study, 297 participants in the validity group and 31 participants in the reliability group. When evaluated against a present Beighton Score with an age-dependent cut-off, the Swedish 5PQ attained a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 75% and an area under the curve of 0.87. The Swedish 5PQ showed substantial to almost perfect test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish 5PQ is a valid and reliable instrument to screen for or to identify generalised joint hypermobility. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7079417/ /pubmed/32183749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3067-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glans, Martin
Humble, Mats B.
Elwin, Marie
Bejerot, Susanne
Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title_full Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title_fullStr Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title_full_unstemmed Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title_short Self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a Swedish non-clinical adult population
title_sort self-rated joint hypermobility: the five-part questionnaire evaluated in a swedish non-clinical adult population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3067-1
work_keys_str_mv AT glansmartin selfratedjointhypermobilitythefivepartquestionnaireevaluatedinaswedishnonclinicaladultpopulation
AT humblematsb selfratedjointhypermobilitythefivepartquestionnaireevaluatedinaswedishnonclinicaladultpopulation
AT elwinmarie selfratedjointhypermobilitythefivepartquestionnaireevaluatedinaswedishnonclinicaladultpopulation
AT bejerotsusanne selfratedjointhypermobilitythefivepartquestionnaireevaluatedinaswedishnonclinicaladultpopulation