Cargando…
Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0 |
_version_ | 1783507832834883584 |
---|---|
author | Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kovacevic, Tanja Runjic, Edita Simicic Majce, Ana Markic, Josko Polic, Branka Mestrovic, Julije Puljak, Livia |
author_facet | Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kovacevic, Tanja Runjic, Edita Simicic Majce, Ana Markic, Josko Polic, Branka Mestrovic, Julije Puljak, Livia |
author_sort | Jelicic Kadic, Antonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them. METHODS: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published. RESULTS: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7079476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70794762020-03-23 Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kovacevic, Tanja Runjic, Edita Simicic Majce, Ana Markic, Josko Polic, Branka Mestrovic, Julije Puljak, Livia BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them. METHODS: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published. RESULTS: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7079476/ /pubmed/32183718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kovacevic, Tanja Runjic, Edita Simicic Majce, Ana Markic, Josko Polic, Branka Mestrovic, Julije Puljak, Livia Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title | Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title_full | Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title_fullStr | Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title_full_unstemmed | Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title_short | Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
title_sort | research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jelicickadicantonia researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT kovacevictanja researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT runjicedita researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT simicicmajceana researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT markicjosko researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT policbranka researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT mestrovicjulije researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics AT puljaklivia researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics |