Cargando…

Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics

BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, Kovacevic, Tanja, Runjic, Edita, Simicic Majce, Ana, Markic, Josko, Polic, Branka, Mestrovic, Julije, Puljak, Livia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0
_version_ 1783507832834883584
author Jelicic Kadic, Antonia
Kovacevic, Tanja
Runjic, Edita
Simicic Majce, Ana
Markic, Josko
Polic, Branka
Mestrovic, Julije
Puljak, Livia
author_facet Jelicic Kadic, Antonia
Kovacevic, Tanja
Runjic, Edita
Simicic Majce, Ana
Markic, Josko
Polic, Branka
Mestrovic, Julije
Puljak, Livia
author_sort Jelicic Kadic, Antonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them. METHODS: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published. RESULTS: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70794762020-03-23 Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kovacevic, Tanja Runjic, Edita Simicic Majce, Ana Markic, Josko Polic, Branka Mestrovic, Julije Puljak, Livia BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: One of the frequently used methods for assessing research trends and the impact of published scientific literature in a particular discipline is citation analysis. Journals may strive to improve their metrics by choosing manuscripts and study designs that are more likely to be cited. The aim of this study was to identify the 50 most-cited articles in the field of pediatrics, analyze their study design and other characteristics of those articles, and assess the prevalence of systematic reviews among them. METHODS: In December 2017, we searched Web of Science (WoS) for all articles published in the field of pediatrics. Two authors screened articles independently and in the further analysis included 50 articles with the highest number of citations. To avoid bias for scientific papers published earlier, the citation density was calculated. We also analyzed Journal Impact Factor (JIF) of journals where citation classics were published. RESULTS: The citation density in top 50 cited articles in the field of pediatrics ranged from 33.16 to 432.8, with the average of 119.95. Most of the articles reported clinical science. Median 2016 JIF for journals that published them was 6.226 (range: 2.778 to 72.406). Half of the top 10 highly cited articles in pediatrics were published in a journal with JIF below 5. Most of the studies among the citation classics in pediatrics were cross-sectional studies (N = 22), followed by non-systematic narrative reviews (N = 10), randomized controlled trials (N = 5), cohort studies (N = 5), systematic reviews (N = 2), case-control studies (N = 2), case reports (N = 2), and there was one study protocol and one expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Few randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews were among citation classics in the field of pediatrics. Articles that use observational research methodology, and are published in journals with lower impact factors, can become citation classics. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7079476/ /pubmed/32183718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jelicic Kadic, Antonia
Kovacevic, Tanja
Runjic, Edita
Simicic Majce, Ana
Markic, Josko
Polic, Branka
Mestrovic, Julije
Puljak, Livia
Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title_full Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title_fullStr Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title_full_unstemmed Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title_short Research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
title_sort research methodology used in the 50 most cited articles in the field of pediatrics: types of studies that become citation classics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00940-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jelicickadicantonia researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT kovacevictanja researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT runjicedita researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT simicicmajceana researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT markicjosko researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT policbranka researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT mestrovicjulije researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics
AT puljaklivia researchmethodologyusedinthe50mostcitedarticlesinthefieldofpediatricstypesofstudiesthatbecomecitationclassics