Cargando…

Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization

BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of the adequacy of prenatal care utilization is critical to inform the relationship between prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review critically appraises the evidence on measurement properties of prenatal care utilization indices and provides re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowe, Stewart, Karkhaneh, Zahra, MacDonald, Isaiah, Chambers, Thane, Amjad, Sana, Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro, Chari, Radha, Kumar, Manoj, Ospina, Maria B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2822-5
_version_ 1783507833072910336
author Rowe, Stewart
Karkhaneh, Zahra
MacDonald, Isaiah
Chambers, Thane
Amjad, Sana
Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro
Chari, Radha
Kumar, Manoj
Ospina, Maria B.
author_facet Rowe, Stewart
Karkhaneh, Zahra
MacDonald, Isaiah
Chambers, Thane
Amjad, Sana
Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro
Chari, Radha
Kumar, Manoj
Ospina, Maria B.
author_sort Rowe, Stewart
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of the adequacy of prenatal care utilization is critical to inform the relationship between prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review critically appraises the evidence on measurement properties of prenatal care utilization indices and provides recommendations about which index is the most useful for this purpose. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched from database inception to October 2018 using keywords related to indices of prenatal care utilization. No language restrictions were imposed. Studies were included if they evaluated the reliability, validity, or responsiveness of at least one index of adequacy of prenatal care utilization. We used the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. We conducted an evidence synthesis using predefined criteria to appraise the measurement properties of the indices. RESULTS: From 2664 studies initially screened, 13 unique studies evaluated the measurement properties of at least one index of prenatal care utilization. Most of the indices of adequacy of prenatal care currently used in research and clinical practice have been evaluated for at least some form of reliability and/or validity. Evidence about the responsiveness to change of these indices is absent from these evaluations. The Adequacy Perinatal Care Utilization Index (APNCUI) and the Kessner Index are supported by moderate evidence regarding their reliability, predictive and concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The scientific literature has not comprehensively reported the measurement properties of commonly used indices of prenatal care utilization, and there is insufficient research to inform the choice of the best index. Lack of strong evidence about which index is the best to measure prenatal care utilization has important implications for tracking health care utilization and for formulating prenatal care recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70794772020-03-23 Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization Rowe, Stewart Karkhaneh, Zahra MacDonald, Isaiah Chambers, Thane Amjad, Sana Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro Chari, Radha Kumar, Manoj Ospina, Maria B. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of the adequacy of prenatal care utilization is critical to inform the relationship between prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review critically appraises the evidence on measurement properties of prenatal care utilization indices and provides recommendations about which index is the most useful for this purpose. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched from database inception to October 2018 using keywords related to indices of prenatal care utilization. No language restrictions were imposed. Studies were included if they evaluated the reliability, validity, or responsiveness of at least one index of adequacy of prenatal care utilization. We used the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. We conducted an evidence synthesis using predefined criteria to appraise the measurement properties of the indices. RESULTS: From 2664 studies initially screened, 13 unique studies evaluated the measurement properties of at least one index of prenatal care utilization. Most of the indices of adequacy of prenatal care currently used in research and clinical practice have been evaluated for at least some form of reliability and/or validity. Evidence about the responsiveness to change of these indices is absent from these evaluations. The Adequacy Perinatal Care Utilization Index (APNCUI) and the Kessner Index are supported by moderate evidence regarding their reliability, predictive and concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: The scientific literature has not comprehensively reported the measurement properties of commonly used indices of prenatal care utilization, and there is insufficient research to inform the choice of the best index. Lack of strong evidence about which index is the best to measure prenatal care utilization has important implications for tracking health care utilization and for formulating prenatal care recommendations. BioMed Central 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7079477/ /pubmed/32183724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2822-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rowe, Stewart
Karkhaneh, Zahra
MacDonald, Isaiah
Chambers, Thane
Amjad, Sana
Osornio-Vargas, Alvaro
Chari, Radha
Kumar, Manoj
Ospina, Maria B.
Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title_full Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title_fullStr Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title_short Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
title_sort systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2822-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rowestewart systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT karkhanehzahra systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT macdonaldisaiah systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT chambersthane systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT amjadsana systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT osorniovargasalvaro systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT chariradha systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT kumarmanoj systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization
AT ospinamariab systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofindicesofprenatalcareutilization