Cargando…

Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study

BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, it is important to understand the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between patients and their family physicians (FPs). METHODS: A secondary analysis of a previous multicenter cross-sectional obse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamano, Jun, Oishi, Ai, Morita, Tatsuya, Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00543-y
_version_ 1783507844844224512
author Hamano, Jun
Oishi, Ai
Morita, Tatsuya
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Hamano, Jun
Oishi, Ai
Morita, Tatsuya
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Hamano, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, it is important to understand the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between patients and their family physicians (FPs). METHODS: A secondary analysis of a previous multicenter cross-sectional observational study was performed. The primary outcome of this analysis was the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between outpatients and FPs. In March 2017, 22 family physicians at 17 clinics scheduled a day to assess outpatients and enrolled patients older than 65 years who were recognized by FPs as having regular visits. We defined three ACP discussion topics: 1) future decline in activities of daily living (ADL), 2) future inability to eat, and 3) surrogate decision makers. FPs assessed whether they had ever discussed any ACP topics with each patient and their family members, and if they had documented the results of these discussions in medical records before patients were enrolled in the present study. We defined patients as being at risk of deteriorating and dying if they had at least 2 positive general indicators or at least 1 positive disease-specific indicator in the Japanese version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool. RESULTS: In total, 382 patients with a mean age of 77.4 ± 7.9 years were enrolled, and 63.1% were female. Seventy-nine patients (20.7%) had discussed at least one ACP topic with their FPs. However, only 23 patients (6.0%) had discussed an ACP topic with family members and their FPs, with the results being documented in their medical records. The topic of future ADL decline was discussed and documented more often than the other two topics. Patients at risk of deteriorating and dying discussed ACP topics significantly more often than those not at risk of deteriorating and dying (39.4% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FPs may discuss ACP with some of their patients, but may not often document the results of this discussion in medical records. FPs need to be encouraged to discuss ACP with patients and family members and describe the decisions reached in medical records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70795262020-03-23 Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study Hamano, Jun Oishi, Ai Morita, Tatsuya Kizawa, Yoshiyuki BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, it is important to understand the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between patients and their family physicians (FPs). METHODS: A secondary analysis of a previous multicenter cross-sectional observational study was performed. The primary outcome of this analysis was the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between outpatients and FPs. In March 2017, 22 family physicians at 17 clinics scheduled a day to assess outpatients and enrolled patients older than 65 years who were recognized by FPs as having regular visits. We defined three ACP discussion topics: 1) future decline in activities of daily living (ADL), 2) future inability to eat, and 3) surrogate decision makers. FPs assessed whether they had ever discussed any ACP topics with each patient and their family members, and if they had documented the results of these discussions in medical records before patients were enrolled in the present study. We defined patients as being at risk of deteriorating and dying if they had at least 2 positive general indicators or at least 1 positive disease-specific indicator in the Japanese version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool. RESULTS: In total, 382 patients with a mean age of 77.4 ± 7.9 years were enrolled, and 63.1% were female. Seventy-nine patients (20.7%) had discussed at least one ACP topic with their FPs. However, only 23 patients (6.0%) had discussed an ACP topic with family members and their FPs, with the results being documented in their medical records. The topic of future ADL decline was discussed and documented more often than the other two topics. Patients at risk of deteriorating and dying discussed ACP topics significantly more often than those not at risk of deteriorating and dying (39.4% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FPs may discuss ACP with some of their patients, but may not often document the results of this discussion in medical records. FPs need to be encouraged to discuss ACP with patients and family members and describe the decisions reached in medical records. BioMed Central 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7079526/ /pubmed/32183800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00543-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamano, Jun
Oishi, Ai
Morita, Tatsuya
Kizawa, Yoshiyuki
Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title_full Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title_fullStr Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title_short Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
title_sort frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00543-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hamanojun frequencyofdiscussinganddocumentingadvancecareplanninginprimarycaresecondaryanalysisofamulticentercrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT oishiai frequencyofdiscussinganddocumentingadvancecareplanninginprimarycaresecondaryanalysisofamulticentercrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT moritatatsuya frequencyofdiscussinganddocumentingadvancecareplanninginprimarycaresecondaryanalysisofamulticentercrosssectionalobservationalstudy
AT kizawayoshiyuki frequencyofdiscussinganddocumentingadvancecareplanninginprimarycaresecondaryanalysisofamulticentercrosssectionalobservationalstudy