Cargando…
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates av...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949 |
_version_ | 1783507871427723264 |
---|---|
author | Holliman, Peter J. Connell, Arthur Jones, Eurig W. Kershaw, Christopher P. |
author_facet | Holliman, Peter J. Connell, Arthur Jones, Eurig W. Kershaw, Christopher P. |
author_sort | Holliman, Peter J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO(2)) and manganese dioxide (MnO(2)). For MnO(2), to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO(2) and MnO(2), respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO(2) pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH(3)NH(3)PbBr(3) PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO(2) pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO(2) devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (V(oc)). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO(2) or MnO(2) pastes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7079644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70796442020-03-24 Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells Holliman, Peter J. Connell, Arthur Jones, Eurig W. Kershaw, Christopher P. Materials (Basel) Article Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO(2)) and manganese dioxide (MnO(2)). For MnO(2), to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO(2) and MnO(2), respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO(2) pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH(3)NH(3)PbBr(3) PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO(2) pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO(2) devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (V(oc)). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO(2) or MnO(2) pastes. MDPI 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7079644/ /pubmed/32093276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Holliman, Peter J. Connell, Arthur Jones, Eurig W. Kershaw, Christopher P. Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title | Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_full | Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_fullStr | Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_short | Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells |
title_sort | metal oxide oxidation catalysts as scaffolds for perovskite solar cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollimanpeterj metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells AT connellarthur metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells AT joneseurigw metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells AT kershawchristopherp metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells |