Cargando…

Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells

Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holliman, Peter J., Connell, Arthur, Jones, Eurig W., Kershaw, Christopher P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949
_version_ 1783507871427723264
author Holliman, Peter J.
Connell, Arthur
Jones, Eurig W.
Kershaw, Christopher P.
author_facet Holliman, Peter J.
Connell, Arthur
Jones, Eurig W.
Kershaw, Christopher P.
author_sort Holliman, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO(2)) and manganese dioxide (MnO(2)). For MnO(2), to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO(2) and MnO(2), respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO(2) pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH(3)NH(3)PbBr(3) PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO(2) pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO(2) devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (V(oc)). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO(2) or MnO(2) pastes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7079644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70796442020-03-24 Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells Holliman, Peter J. Connell, Arthur Jones, Eurig W. Kershaw, Christopher P. Materials (Basel) Article Whilst the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) perovskite solar cell (PSC) devices that have reported to date have been fabricated by high temperature sintering (>500 °C) of mesoporous metal oxide scaffolds, lower temperature processing is desirable for increasing the range of substrates available and also decrease the energy requirements during device manufacture. In this work, titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) mesoporous scaffolds have been compared with metal oxide oxidation catalysts: cerium dioxide (CeO(2)) and manganese dioxide (MnO(2)). For MnO(2), to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a low energy band gap metal oxide has been used as a scaffold in the PSC devices. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that organic binder removal is completed at temperatures of 350 °C and 275 °C for CeO(2) and MnO(2), respectively. By comparison, the binder removal from TiO(2) pastes requires temperatures >500 °C. CH(3)NH(3)PbBr(3) PSC devices that were fabricated while using MnO(2) pastes sintered at 550 °C show slightly improved PCE (η = 3.9%) versus mesoporous TiO(2) devices (η = 3.8%) as a result of increased open circuit voltage (V(oc)). However, the resultant PSC devices showed no efficiency despite apparently complete binder removal during lower temperature (325 °C) sintering using CeO(2) or MnO(2) pastes. MDPI 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7079644/ /pubmed/32093276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Holliman, Peter J.
Connell, Arthur
Jones, Eurig W.
Kershaw, Christopher P.
Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title_full Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title_fullStr Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title_full_unstemmed Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title_short Metal Oxide Oxidation Catalysts as Scaffolds for Perovskite Solar Cells
title_sort metal oxide oxidation catalysts as scaffolds for perovskite solar cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32093276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13040949
work_keys_str_mv AT hollimanpeterj metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells
AT connellarthur metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells
AT joneseurigw metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells
AT kershawchristopherp metaloxideoxidationcatalystsasscaffoldsforperovskitesolarcells