Cargando…

MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation

Over the last decade, adherent MDCK (Madin Darby canine kidney) and Vero cells have attracted considerable attention for production of cell culture-derived influenza vaccines. While numerous publications deal with the design and the optimization of corresponding upstream processes, one-to-one compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Genzel, Yvonne, Dietzsch, Christian, Rapp, Erdmann, Schwarzer, Jana, Reichl, Udo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20617311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2742-9
_version_ 1783507961640910848
author Genzel, Yvonne
Dietzsch, Christian
Rapp, Erdmann
Schwarzer, Jana
Reichl, Udo
author_facet Genzel, Yvonne
Dietzsch, Christian
Rapp, Erdmann
Schwarzer, Jana
Reichl, Udo
author_sort Genzel, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description Over the last decade, adherent MDCK (Madin Darby canine kidney) and Vero cells have attracted considerable attention for production of cell culture-derived influenza vaccines. While numerous publications deal with the design and the optimization of corresponding upstream processes, one-to-one comparisons of these cell lines under comparable cultivation conditions have largely been neglected. Therefore, a direct comparison of influenza virus production with adherent MDCK and Vero cells in T-flasks, roller bottles, and lab-scale bioreactors was performed in this study. First, virus seeds had to be adapted to Vero cells by multiple passages. Glycan analysis of the hemagglutinin (HA) protein showed that for influenza A/PR/8/34 H1N1, three passages were sufficient to achieve a stable new N-glycan fingerprint, higher yields, and a faster increase to maximum HA titers. Compared to MDCK cells, virus production in serum-free medium with Vero cells was highly sensitive to trypsin concentration. Virus stability at 37 °C for different virus strains showed differences depending on medium, virus strain, and cell line. After careful adjustment of corresponding parameters, comparable productivity was obtained with both host cell lines in small-scale cultivation systems. However, using these cultivation conditions in lab-scale bioreactors (stirred tank, wave bioreactor) resulted in lower productivities for Vero cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7080112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70801122020-03-23 MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation Genzel, Yvonne Dietzsch, Christian Rapp, Erdmann Schwarzer, Jana Reichl, Udo Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering Over the last decade, adherent MDCK (Madin Darby canine kidney) and Vero cells have attracted considerable attention for production of cell culture-derived influenza vaccines. While numerous publications deal with the design and the optimization of corresponding upstream processes, one-to-one comparisons of these cell lines under comparable cultivation conditions have largely been neglected. Therefore, a direct comparison of influenza virus production with adherent MDCK and Vero cells in T-flasks, roller bottles, and lab-scale bioreactors was performed in this study. First, virus seeds had to be adapted to Vero cells by multiple passages. Glycan analysis of the hemagglutinin (HA) protein showed that for influenza A/PR/8/34 H1N1, three passages were sufficient to achieve a stable new N-glycan fingerprint, higher yields, and a faster increase to maximum HA titers. Compared to MDCK cells, virus production in serum-free medium with Vero cells was highly sensitive to trypsin concentration. Virus stability at 37 °C for different virus strains showed differences depending on medium, virus strain, and cell line. After careful adjustment of corresponding parameters, comparable productivity was obtained with both host cell lines in small-scale cultivation systems. However, using these cultivation conditions in lab-scale bioreactors (stirred tank, wave bioreactor) resulted in lower productivities for Vero cells. Springer-Verlag 2010-07-09 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC7080112/ /pubmed/20617311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2742-9 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2010 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering
Genzel, Yvonne
Dietzsch, Christian
Rapp, Erdmann
Schwarzer, Jana
Reichl, Udo
MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title_full MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title_fullStr MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title_full_unstemmed MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title_short MDCK and Vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
title_sort mdck and vero cells for influenza virus vaccine production: a one-to-one comparison up to lab-scale bioreactor cultivation
topic Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20617311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2742-9
work_keys_str_mv AT genzelyvonne mdckandverocellsforinfluenzavirusvaccineproductionaonetoonecomparisonuptolabscalebioreactorcultivation
AT dietzschchristian mdckandverocellsforinfluenzavirusvaccineproductionaonetoonecomparisonuptolabscalebioreactorcultivation
AT rapperdmann mdckandverocellsforinfluenzavirusvaccineproductionaonetoonecomparisonuptolabscalebioreactorcultivation
AT schwarzerjana mdckandverocellsforinfluenzavirusvaccineproductionaonetoonecomparisonuptolabscalebioreactorcultivation
AT reichludo mdckandverocellsforinfluenzavirusvaccineproductionaonetoonecomparisonuptolabscalebioreactorcultivation