Cargando…
Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning
Newborn screening (NBS) for inborn metabolic disorders is a highly successful public health program that by design is accompanied by false-positive results. Here we trained a Random Forest machine learning classifier on screening data to improve prediction of true and false positives. Data included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6010016 |
_version_ | 1783507979147935744 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Gang Tang, Yishuo Cowan, Tina M. Enns, Gregory M. Zhao, Hongyu Scharfe, Curt |
author_facet | Peng, Gang Tang, Yishuo Cowan, Tina M. Enns, Gregory M. Zhao, Hongyu Scharfe, Curt |
author_sort | Peng, Gang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Newborn screening (NBS) for inborn metabolic disorders is a highly successful public health program that by design is accompanied by false-positive results. Here we trained a Random Forest machine learning classifier on screening data to improve prediction of true and false positives. Data included 39 metabolic analytes detected by tandem mass spectrometry and clinical variables such as gestational age and birth weight. Analytical performance was evaluated for a cohort of 2777 screen positives reported by the California NBS program, which consisted of 235 confirmed cases and 2542 false positives for one of four disorders: glutaric acidemia type 1 (GA-1), methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD), and very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). Without changing the sensitivity to detect these disorders in screening, Random Forest-based analysis of all metabolites reduced the number of false positives for GA-1 by 89%, for MMA by 45%, for OTCD by 98%, and for VLCADD by 2%. All primary disease markers and previously reported analytes such as methionine for MMA and OTCD were among the top-ranked analytes. Random Forest’s ability to classify GA-1 false positives was found similar to results obtained using Clinical Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR). We developed an online Random Forest tool for interpretive analysis of increasingly complex data from newborn screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7080200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70802002020-03-18 Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning Peng, Gang Tang, Yishuo Cowan, Tina M. Enns, Gregory M. Zhao, Hongyu Scharfe, Curt Int J Neonatal Screen Article Newborn screening (NBS) for inborn metabolic disorders is a highly successful public health program that by design is accompanied by false-positive results. Here we trained a Random Forest machine learning classifier on screening data to improve prediction of true and false positives. Data included 39 metabolic analytes detected by tandem mass spectrometry and clinical variables such as gestational age and birth weight. Analytical performance was evaluated for a cohort of 2777 screen positives reported by the California NBS program, which consisted of 235 confirmed cases and 2542 false positives for one of four disorders: glutaric acidemia type 1 (GA-1), methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD), and very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). Without changing the sensitivity to detect these disorders in screening, Random Forest-based analysis of all metabolites reduced the number of false positives for GA-1 by 89%, for MMA by 45%, for OTCD by 98%, and for VLCADD by 2%. All primary disease markers and previously reported analytes such as methionine for MMA and OTCD were among the top-ranked analytes. Random Forest’s ability to classify GA-1 false positives was found similar to results obtained using Clinical Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR). We developed an online Random Forest tool for interpretive analysis of increasingly complex data from newborn screening. MDPI 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7080200/ /pubmed/32190768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6010016 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Peng, Gang Tang, Yishuo Cowan, Tina M. Enns, Gregory M. Zhao, Hongyu Scharfe, Curt Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title | Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | reducing false-positive results in newborn screening using machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6010016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penggang reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning AT tangyishuo reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning AT cowantinam reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning AT ennsgregorym reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning AT zhaohongyu reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning AT scharfecurt reducingfalsepositiveresultsinnewbornscreeningusingmachinelearning |