Cargando…

The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of AC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schichtel, Markus, Wee, Bee, Perera, Rafael, Onakpoya, Igho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w
_version_ 1783508037030379520
author Schichtel, Markus
Wee, Bee
Perera, Rafael
Onakpoya, Igho
author_facet Schichtel, Markus
Wee, Bee
Perera, Rafael
Onakpoya, Igho
author_sort Schichtel, Markus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of ACP in heart failure through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and PsycINFO (inception to July 2018). We selected RCTs including adult patients with heart failure treated in a hospital, hospice or community setting. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and evaluated the quality of evidence (GRADE tool) and analysed interventions according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) in random effects models for pooled effects using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs including 2924 participants met all of the inclusion criteria. There was a moderate effect in favour of ACP for quality of life (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI [0.09 to 0.68]), patients’ satisfaction with end-of-life care (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI [0.14 to 0.64]) and the quality of end-of-life communication (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.17 to 0.42]) for patients suffering from heart failure. ACP seemed most effective if it was introduced at significant milestones in a patient’s disease trajectory, included family members, involved follow-up appointments and considered ethnic preferences. Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the statistically significant direction of effect. Heterogeneity was mainly due to different study settings, length of follow-up periods and compositions of ACP. CONCLUSIONS: ACP improved quality of life, patient satisfaction with end-of-life care and the quality of end-of-life communication for patients suffering from heart failure and could be most effective when the right timing, follow-up and involvement of important others was considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7080664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70806642020-03-23 The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Schichtel, Markus Wee, Bee Perera, Rafael Onakpoya, Igho J Gen Intern Med Review BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of ACP in heart failure through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and PsycINFO (inception to July 2018). We selected RCTs including adult patients with heart failure treated in a hospital, hospice or community setting. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and evaluated the quality of evidence (GRADE tool) and analysed interventions according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) in random effects models for pooled effects using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs including 2924 participants met all of the inclusion criteria. There was a moderate effect in favour of ACP for quality of life (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI [0.09 to 0.68]), patients’ satisfaction with end-of-life care (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI [0.14 to 0.64]) and the quality of end-of-life communication (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.17 to 0.42]) for patients suffering from heart failure. ACP seemed most effective if it was introduced at significant milestones in a patient’s disease trajectory, included family members, involved follow-up appointments and considered ethnic preferences. Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the statistically significant direction of effect. Heterogeneity was mainly due to different study settings, length of follow-up periods and compositions of ACP. CONCLUSIONS: ACP improved quality of life, patient satisfaction with end-of-life care and the quality of end-of-life communication for patients suffering from heart failure and could be most effective when the right timing, follow-up and involvement of important others was considered. Springer US 2019-11-12 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7080664/ /pubmed/31720968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Schichtel, Markus
Wee, Bee
Perera, Rafael
Onakpoya, Igho
The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort effect of advance care planning on heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schichtelmarkus theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weebee theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pererarafael theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT onakpoyaigho theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schichtelmarkus effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weebee effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pererarafael effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT onakpoyaigho effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis