Cargando…
The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of AC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w |
_version_ | 1783508037030379520 |
---|---|
author | Schichtel, Markus Wee, Bee Perera, Rafael Onakpoya, Igho |
author_facet | Schichtel, Markus Wee, Bee Perera, Rafael Onakpoya, Igho |
author_sort | Schichtel, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of ACP in heart failure through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and PsycINFO (inception to July 2018). We selected RCTs including adult patients with heart failure treated in a hospital, hospice or community setting. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and evaluated the quality of evidence (GRADE tool) and analysed interventions according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) in random effects models for pooled effects using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs including 2924 participants met all of the inclusion criteria. There was a moderate effect in favour of ACP for quality of life (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI [0.09 to 0.68]), patients’ satisfaction with end-of-life care (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI [0.14 to 0.64]) and the quality of end-of-life communication (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.17 to 0.42]) for patients suffering from heart failure. ACP seemed most effective if it was introduced at significant milestones in a patient’s disease trajectory, included family members, involved follow-up appointments and considered ethnic preferences. Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the statistically significant direction of effect. Heterogeneity was mainly due to different study settings, length of follow-up periods and compositions of ACP. CONCLUSIONS: ACP improved quality of life, patient satisfaction with end-of-life care and the quality of end-of-life communication for patients suffering from heart failure and could be most effective when the right timing, follow-up and involvement of important others was considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7080664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70806642020-03-23 The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Schichtel, Markus Wee, Bee Perera, Rafael Onakpoya, Igho J Gen Intern Med Review BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is widely advocated to improve outcomes in end-of-life care for patients suffering from heart failure. But until now, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on clinical outcomes. Our aim was to determine the effect of ACP in heart failure through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Citation Index and PsycINFO (inception to July 2018). We selected RCTs including adult patients with heart failure treated in a hospital, hospice or community setting. Three reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) and evaluated the quality of evidence (GRADE tool) and analysed interventions according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) in random effects models for pooled effects using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs including 2924 participants met all of the inclusion criteria. There was a moderate effect in favour of ACP for quality of life (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI [0.09 to 0.68]), patients’ satisfaction with end-of-life care (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI [0.14 to 0.64]) and the quality of end-of-life communication (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI [0.17 to 0.42]) for patients suffering from heart failure. ACP seemed most effective if it was introduced at significant milestones in a patient’s disease trajectory, included family members, involved follow-up appointments and considered ethnic preferences. Several sensitivity analyses confirmed the statistically significant direction of effect. Heterogeneity was mainly due to different study settings, length of follow-up periods and compositions of ACP. CONCLUSIONS: ACP improved quality of life, patient satisfaction with end-of-life care and the quality of end-of-life communication for patients suffering from heart failure and could be most effective when the right timing, follow-up and involvement of important others was considered. Springer US 2019-11-12 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7080664/ /pubmed/31720968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Schichtel, Markus Wee, Bee Perera, Rafael Onakpoya, Igho The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | The Effect of Advance Care Planning on Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of advance care planning on heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31720968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05482-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schichtelmarkus theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weebee theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pererarafael theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT onakpoyaigho theeffectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schichtelmarkus effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weebee effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pererarafael effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT onakpoyaigho effectofadvancecareplanningonheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |