Cargando…

Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods

Protected areas (PAs) are a foundational and essential strategy for reducing biodiversity loss. However, many PAs around the world exist on paper only; thus, while logging and habitat conversion may be banned in these areas, illegal activities often continue to cause alarming habitat destruction. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clerici, N., Armenteras, D., Kareiva, P., Botero, R., Ramírez-Delgado, J. P., Forero-Medina, G., Ochoa, J., Pedraza, C., Schneider, L., Lora, C., Gómez, C., Linares, M., Hirashiki, C., Biggs, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y
_version_ 1783508056309497856
author Clerici, N.
Armenteras, D.
Kareiva, P.
Botero, R.
Ramírez-Delgado, J. P.
Forero-Medina, G.
Ochoa, J.
Pedraza, C.
Schneider, L.
Lora, C.
Gómez, C.
Linares, M.
Hirashiki, C.
Biggs, D.
author_facet Clerici, N.
Armenteras, D.
Kareiva, P.
Botero, R.
Ramírez-Delgado, J. P.
Forero-Medina, G.
Ochoa, J.
Pedraza, C.
Schneider, L.
Lora, C.
Gómez, C.
Linares, M.
Hirashiki, C.
Biggs, D.
author_sort Clerici, N.
collection PubMed
description Protected areas (PAs) are a foundational and essential strategy for reducing biodiversity loss. However, many PAs around the world exist on paper only; thus, while logging and habitat conversion may be banned in these areas, illegal activities often continue to cause alarming habitat destruction. In such cases, the presence of armed conflict may ultimately prevent incursions to a greater extent than the absence of conflict. Although there are several reports of habitat destruction following cessation of conflict, there has never been a systematic and quantitative “before-and-after-conflict” analysis of a large sample of PAs and surrounding areas. Here we report the results of such a study in Colombia, using an open-access global forest change dataset. By analysing 39 PAs over three years before and after Colombia’s peace agreement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), we found a dramatic and highly significant increase in the deforestation rate for the majority of these areas and their buffer zones. We discuss the reasons behind such findings from the Colombian case, and debate some general conservation lessons applicable to other countries undergoing post-conflict transitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7080754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70807542020-03-23 Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods Clerici, N. Armenteras, D. Kareiva, P. Botero, R. Ramírez-Delgado, J. P. Forero-Medina, G. Ochoa, J. Pedraza, C. Schneider, L. Lora, C. Gómez, C. Linares, M. Hirashiki, C. Biggs, D. Sci Rep Article Protected areas (PAs) are a foundational and essential strategy for reducing biodiversity loss. However, many PAs around the world exist on paper only; thus, while logging and habitat conversion may be banned in these areas, illegal activities often continue to cause alarming habitat destruction. In such cases, the presence of armed conflict may ultimately prevent incursions to a greater extent than the absence of conflict. Although there are several reports of habitat destruction following cessation of conflict, there has never been a systematic and quantitative “before-and-after-conflict” analysis of a large sample of PAs and surrounding areas. Here we report the results of such a study in Colombia, using an open-access global forest change dataset. By analysing 39 PAs over three years before and after Colombia’s peace agreement with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), we found a dramatic and highly significant increase in the deforestation rate for the majority of these areas and their buffer zones. We discuss the reasons behind such findings from the Colombian case, and debate some general conservation lessons applicable to other countries undergoing post-conflict transitions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7080754/ /pubmed/32188909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Clerici, N.
Armenteras, D.
Kareiva, P.
Botero, R.
Ramírez-Delgado, J. P.
Forero-Medina, G.
Ochoa, J.
Pedraza, C.
Schneider, L.
Lora, C.
Gómez, C.
Linares, M.
Hirashiki, C.
Biggs, D.
Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title_full Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title_fullStr Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title_full_unstemmed Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title_short Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
title_sort deforestation in colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61861-y
work_keys_str_mv AT clericin deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT armenterasd deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT kareivap deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT boteror deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT ramirezdelgadojp deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT foreromedinag deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT ochoaj deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT pedrazac deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT schneiderl deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT lorac deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT gomezc deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT linaresm deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT hirashikic deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods
AT biggsd deforestationincolombianprotectedareasincreasedduringpostconflictperiods