Cargando…
Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the dro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074 |
_version_ | 1783508091910750208 |
---|---|
author | Bossi, Francesco Premoli, Isabella Pizzamiglio, Sara Balaban, Sema Ricciardelli, Paola Rivolta, Davide |
author_facet | Bossi, Francesco Premoli, Isabella Pizzamiglio, Sara Balaban, Sema Ricciardelli, Paola Rivolta, Davide |
author_sort | Bossi, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the drop in performance when these stimuli are perceived upside-down. Albeit FIE and BIE have been well characterized at the behavioral level, much still needs to be understood in terms of the neurophysiological correlates of these effects. Thus, in the current study, the brain’s electrical activity has been recorded by a 128 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 24 healthy participants while perceiving (upright and inverted) faces, bodies and houses. EEG data were analyzed in both the time domain (i.e., event-related potentials—ERPs) and the frequency domain [i.e., induced theta (5–7 Hz) and gamma (28–45 Hz) oscillations]. ERPs amplitude results showed increased N170 amplitude for inverted faces and bodies (compared to the same stimuli presented in canonical position) but not for houses. ERPs latency results showed delayed N170 components for inverted (vs. upright) faces, houses, but not bodies. Spectral analysis of induced oscillations indicated physiological FIE and BIE; that is decreased gamma-band synchronization over right occipito-temporal electrodes for inverted (vs. upright) faces, and increased bilateral frontoparietal theta-band synchronization for inverted (vs. upright) faces. Furthermore, increased left occipito-temporal and right frontal theta-band synchronization for upright (vs. inverted) bodies was found. Our findings, thus, demonstrate clear differences in the neurophysiological correlates of face and body perception. The neurophysiological FIE suggests disruption of feature binding processes (decrease in occipital gamma oscillations for inverted faces), together with enhanced feature-based attention (increase in frontoparietal theta oscillations for inverted faces). In contrast, the BIE may suggest that structural encoding for bodies is mediated by the first stages of configural processing (decrease in occipital theta oscillations for inverted bodies). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7080986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70809862020-03-27 Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception Bossi, Francesco Premoli, Isabella Pizzamiglio, Sara Balaban, Sema Ricciardelli, Paola Rivolta, Davide Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the drop in performance when these stimuli are perceived upside-down. Albeit FIE and BIE have been well characterized at the behavioral level, much still needs to be understood in terms of the neurophysiological correlates of these effects. Thus, in the current study, the brain’s electrical activity has been recorded by a 128 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 24 healthy participants while perceiving (upright and inverted) faces, bodies and houses. EEG data were analyzed in both the time domain (i.e., event-related potentials—ERPs) and the frequency domain [i.e., induced theta (5–7 Hz) and gamma (28–45 Hz) oscillations]. ERPs amplitude results showed increased N170 amplitude for inverted faces and bodies (compared to the same stimuli presented in canonical position) but not for houses. ERPs latency results showed delayed N170 components for inverted (vs. upright) faces, houses, but not bodies. Spectral analysis of induced oscillations indicated physiological FIE and BIE; that is decreased gamma-band synchronization over right occipito-temporal electrodes for inverted (vs. upright) faces, and increased bilateral frontoparietal theta-band synchronization for inverted (vs. upright) faces. Furthermore, increased left occipito-temporal and right frontal theta-band synchronization for upright (vs. inverted) bodies was found. Our findings, thus, demonstrate clear differences in the neurophysiological correlates of face and body perception. The neurophysiological FIE suggests disruption of feature binding processes (decrease in occipital gamma oscillations for inverted faces), together with enhanced feature-based attention (increase in frontoparietal theta oscillations for inverted faces). In contrast, the BIE may suggest that structural encoding for bodies is mediated by the first stages of configural processing (decrease in occipital theta oscillations for inverted bodies). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7080986/ /pubmed/32226369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bossi, Premoli, Pizzamiglio, Balaban, Ricciardelli and Rivolta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Bossi, Francesco Premoli, Isabella Pizzamiglio, Sara Balaban, Sema Ricciardelli, Paola Rivolta, Davide Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title | Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title_full | Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title_fullStr | Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title_short | Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception |
title_sort | theta- and gamma-band activity discriminates face, body and object perception |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bossifrancesco thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception AT premoliisabella thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception AT pizzamigliosara thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception AT balabansema thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception AT ricciardellipaola thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception AT rivoltadavide thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception |