Cargando…

Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception

Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the dro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bossi, Francesco, Premoli, Isabella, Pizzamiglio, Sara, Balaban, Sema, Ricciardelli, Paola, Rivolta, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074
_version_ 1783508091910750208
author Bossi, Francesco
Premoli, Isabella
Pizzamiglio, Sara
Balaban, Sema
Ricciardelli, Paola
Rivolta, Davide
author_facet Bossi, Francesco
Premoli, Isabella
Pizzamiglio, Sara
Balaban, Sema
Ricciardelli, Paola
Rivolta, Davide
author_sort Bossi, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the drop in performance when these stimuli are perceived upside-down. Albeit FIE and BIE have been well characterized at the behavioral level, much still needs to be understood in terms of the neurophysiological correlates of these effects. Thus, in the current study, the brain’s electrical activity has been recorded by a 128 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 24 healthy participants while perceiving (upright and inverted) faces, bodies and houses. EEG data were analyzed in both the time domain (i.e., event-related potentials—ERPs) and the frequency domain [i.e., induced theta (5–7 Hz) and gamma (28–45 Hz) oscillations]. ERPs amplitude results showed increased N170 amplitude for inverted faces and bodies (compared to the same stimuli presented in canonical position) but not for houses. ERPs latency results showed delayed N170 components for inverted (vs. upright) faces, houses, but not bodies. Spectral analysis of induced oscillations indicated physiological FIE and BIE; that is decreased gamma-band synchronization over right occipito-temporal electrodes for inverted (vs. upright) faces, and increased bilateral frontoparietal theta-band synchronization for inverted (vs. upright) faces. Furthermore, increased left occipito-temporal and right frontal theta-band synchronization for upright (vs. inverted) bodies was found. Our findings, thus, demonstrate clear differences in the neurophysiological correlates of face and body perception. The neurophysiological FIE suggests disruption of feature binding processes (decrease in occipital gamma oscillations for inverted faces), together with enhanced feature-based attention (increase in frontoparietal theta oscillations for inverted faces). In contrast, the BIE may suggest that structural encoding for bodies is mediated by the first stages of configural processing (decrease in occipital theta oscillations for inverted bodies).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7080986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70809862020-03-27 Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception Bossi, Francesco Premoli, Isabella Pizzamiglio, Sara Balaban, Sema Ricciardelli, Paola Rivolta, Davide Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Face and body perception is mediated by configural mechanisms, which allow the perception of these stimuli as a whole, rather than the sum of individual parts. Indirect measures of configural processing in visual cognition are the face and body inversion effects (FIE and BIE), which refer to the drop in performance when these stimuli are perceived upside-down. Albeit FIE and BIE have been well characterized at the behavioral level, much still needs to be understood in terms of the neurophysiological correlates of these effects. Thus, in the current study, the brain’s electrical activity has been recorded by a 128 channel electroencephalogram (EEG) in 24 healthy participants while perceiving (upright and inverted) faces, bodies and houses. EEG data were analyzed in both the time domain (i.e., event-related potentials—ERPs) and the frequency domain [i.e., induced theta (5–7 Hz) and gamma (28–45 Hz) oscillations]. ERPs amplitude results showed increased N170 amplitude for inverted faces and bodies (compared to the same stimuli presented in canonical position) but not for houses. ERPs latency results showed delayed N170 components for inverted (vs. upright) faces, houses, but not bodies. Spectral analysis of induced oscillations indicated physiological FIE and BIE; that is decreased gamma-band synchronization over right occipito-temporal electrodes for inverted (vs. upright) faces, and increased bilateral frontoparietal theta-band synchronization for inverted (vs. upright) faces. Furthermore, increased left occipito-temporal and right frontal theta-band synchronization for upright (vs. inverted) bodies was found. Our findings, thus, demonstrate clear differences in the neurophysiological correlates of face and body perception. The neurophysiological FIE suggests disruption of feature binding processes (decrease in occipital gamma oscillations for inverted faces), together with enhanced feature-based attention (increase in frontoparietal theta oscillations for inverted faces). In contrast, the BIE may suggest that structural encoding for bodies is mediated by the first stages of configural processing (decrease in occipital theta oscillations for inverted bodies). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7080986/ /pubmed/32226369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bossi, Premoli, Pizzamiglio, Balaban, Ricciardelli and Rivolta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Bossi, Francesco
Premoli, Isabella
Pizzamiglio, Sara
Balaban, Sema
Ricciardelli, Paola
Rivolta, Davide
Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title_full Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title_fullStr Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title_full_unstemmed Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title_short Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception
title_sort theta- and gamma-band activity discriminates face, body and object perception
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7080986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT bossifrancesco thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception
AT premoliisabella thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception
AT pizzamigliosara thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception
AT balabansema thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception
AT ricciardellipaola thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception
AT rivoltadavide thetaandgammabandactivitydiscriminatesfacebodyandobjectperception