Cargando…

Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of systemic inflammation. However, there is little evidence of the value of inflammation in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC). A total of 2,606 patients diagnosed with GC in the past three years and 3,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Tianyi, Wang, Yimin, Yin, Xin, Zhai, Zhao, Zhang, Yu, Yang, Yongheng, You, Qi, Li, Zhiguo, Ma, Yan, Li, Chunfeng, Song, Haibin, Shi, Huawen, Zhang, Yongle, Yu, Xuefeng, Gao, Hongyu, Sun, Yihua, Xie, Rui, Xue, Yingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9146042
_version_ 1783508104812429312
author Fang, Tianyi
Wang, Yimin
Yin, Xin
Zhai, Zhao
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yongheng
You, Qi
Li, Zhiguo
Ma, Yan
Li, Chunfeng
Song, Haibin
Shi, Huawen
Zhang, Yongle
Yu, Xuefeng
Gao, Hongyu
Sun, Yihua
Xie, Rui
Xue, Yingwei
author_facet Fang, Tianyi
Wang, Yimin
Yin, Xin
Zhai, Zhao
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yongheng
You, Qi
Li, Zhiguo
Ma, Yan
Li, Chunfeng
Song, Haibin
Shi, Huawen
Zhang, Yongle
Yu, Xuefeng
Gao, Hongyu
Sun, Yihua
Xie, Rui
Xue, Yingwei
author_sort Fang, Tianyi
collection PubMed
description The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of systemic inflammation. However, there is little evidence of the value of inflammation in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC). A total of 2,606 patients diagnosed with GC in the past three years and 3,219 healthy controls over the same period were included in this study. Peripheral blood samples were obtained to analyze the NLR, PLR, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). The optimal cutoff levels for the NLR and PLR were defined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (NLR = 2.258, PLR = 147.368). The value of different biomarkers for diagnosing GC was compared by the area under the curve (AUC). The NLR and PLR showed diagnostic sensitivity in GC (AUC = 0.715, AUC = 0.707). Using the Bonferroni correction, the NLR and PLR were superior to CEA and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of GC (P < 0.0001). The systemic inflammatory markers were significantly higher in the early stage of GC than tumor markers. After grouping patients and healthy controls by gender, we found that the diagnostic significance of combined NLR and PLR for GC was greater in male patients than in female patients (P < 0.0001). The diagnostic value of the NLR and PLR in GC is higher than that of the traditional tumor markers CEA and CA19-9. Systemic markers of inflammation are more valuable in male than female patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7081040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70810402020-03-24 Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer Fang, Tianyi Wang, Yimin Yin, Xin Zhai, Zhao Zhang, Yu Yang, Yongheng You, Qi Li, Zhiguo Ma, Yan Li, Chunfeng Song, Haibin Shi, Huawen Zhang, Yongle Yu, Xuefeng Gao, Hongyu Sun, Yihua Xie, Rui Xue, Yingwei J Immunol Res Research Article The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of systemic inflammation. However, there is little evidence of the value of inflammation in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC). A total of 2,606 patients diagnosed with GC in the past three years and 3,219 healthy controls over the same period were included in this study. Peripheral blood samples were obtained to analyze the NLR, PLR, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). The optimal cutoff levels for the NLR and PLR were defined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (NLR = 2.258, PLR = 147.368). The value of different biomarkers for diagnosing GC was compared by the area under the curve (AUC). The NLR and PLR showed diagnostic sensitivity in GC (AUC = 0.715, AUC = 0.707). Using the Bonferroni correction, the NLR and PLR were superior to CEA and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of GC (P < 0.0001). The systemic inflammatory markers were significantly higher in the early stage of GC than tumor markers. After grouping patients and healthy controls by gender, we found that the diagnostic significance of combined NLR and PLR for GC was greater in male patients than in female patients (P < 0.0001). The diagnostic value of the NLR and PLR in GC is higher than that of the traditional tumor markers CEA and CA19-9. Systemic markers of inflammation are more valuable in male than female patients. Hindawi 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7081040/ /pubmed/32211444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9146042 Text en Copyright © 2020 Tianyi Fang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fang, Tianyi
Wang, Yimin
Yin, Xin
Zhai, Zhao
Zhang, Yu
Yang, Yongheng
You, Qi
Li, Zhiguo
Ma, Yan
Li, Chunfeng
Song, Haibin
Shi, Huawen
Zhang, Yongle
Yu, Xuefeng
Gao, Hongyu
Sun, Yihua
Xie, Rui
Xue, Yingwei
Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
title_sort diagnostic sensitivity of nlr and plr in early diagnosis of gastric cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9146042
work_keys_str_mv AT fangtianyi diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT wangyimin diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT yinxin diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT zhaizhao diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT zhangyu diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT yangyongheng diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT youqi diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT lizhiguo diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT mayan diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT lichunfeng diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT songhaibin diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT shihuawen diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT zhangyongle diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT yuxuefeng diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT gaohongyu diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT sunyihua diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT xierui diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer
AT xueyingwei diagnosticsensitivityofnlrandplrinearlydiagnosisofgastriccancer