Cargando…

Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE: Many experts recommend ordering an ultrasound and a urinalysis on all patients with scrotal pain. While the ultrasound may help diagnose a number of potential causes of scrotal pain, the urinalysis primarily has value in assessing for epididymo-orchitis. This study sought to evaluate the ut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zitek, Tony, Ahmed, Omar, Lim, Chee, Carodine, Rianda, Martin, Kent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214857
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S234413
_version_ 1783508107391926272
author Zitek, Tony
Ahmed, Omar
Lim, Chee
Carodine, Rianda
Martin, Kent
author_facet Zitek, Tony
Ahmed, Omar
Lim, Chee
Carodine, Rianda
Martin, Kent
author_sort Zitek, Tony
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many experts recommend ordering an ultrasound and a urinalysis on all patients with scrotal pain. While the ultrasound may help diagnose a number of potential causes of scrotal pain, the urinalysis primarily has value in assessing for epididymo-orchitis. This study sought to evaluate the utility of these diagnostic tests for patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute scrotal pain and possible epididymo-orchitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center chart review of patients presenting to the ED with scrotal pain. Trained research assistants reviewed charts to obtain urinalysis and ultrasound results as well as diagnoses and treatments provided. Using the final diagnosis as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and urinalysis were calculated for the diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis. Also, through a prespecified definition of “changed management,” we estimated the percentage of cases in which a urinalysis changed management of patients with acute scrotal pain. RESULTS: We identified 663 adult and pediatric patients who presented with scrotal pain during 2016. All patients had an ultrasound performed, and 458 (69.1%) had a urinalysis done. The sensitivity of urinalysis for epididymo-orchitis was 58.2% (95% CI 48.9% to 67.1%), and the specificity was 85.1% (95% CI 80.8% to 88.7%). For ultrasound, the sensitivity was 78.8% (95% CI 71.4% to 85.0%) and the specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 96.4% to 99.1%). In 24 of 458 cases (5.2% [95% CI 3.4% to 7.7%]) where a urinalysis was obtained, its results may have changed management of the patient. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of patients who present to the ED with scrotal pain is primarily driven by the ultrasound results. While the urinalysis may occasionally provide some benefit in the evaluation of patients with suspected epididymo-orchitis, the reflexive ordering of a urinalysis in patients with scrotal pain may be unnecessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7081061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70810612020-03-25 Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study Zitek, Tony Ahmed, Omar Lim, Chee Carodine, Rianda Martin, Kent Open Access Emerg Med Original Research PURPOSE: Many experts recommend ordering an ultrasound and a urinalysis on all patients with scrotal pain. While the ultrasound may help diagnose a number of potential causes of scrotal pain, the urinalysis primarily has value in assessing for epididymo-orchitis. This study sought to evaluate the utility of these diagnostic tests for patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with acute scrotal pain and possible epididymo-orchitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center chart review of patients presenting to the ED with scrotal pain. Trained research assistants reviewed charts to obtain urinalysis and ultrasound results as well as diagnoses and treatments provided. Using the final diagnosis as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and urinalysis were calculated for the diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis. Also, through a prespecified definition of “changed management,” we estimated the percentage of cases in which a urinalysis changed management of patients with acute scrotal pain. RESULTS: We identified 663 adult and pediatric patients who presented with scrotal pain during 2016. All patients had an ultrasound performed, and 458 (69.1%) had a urinalysis done. The sensitivity of urinalysis for epididymo-orchitis was 58.2% (95% CI 48.9% to 67.1%), and the specificity was 85.1% (95% CI 80.8% to 88.7%). For ultrasound, the sensitivity was 78.8% (95% CI 71.4% to 85.0%) and the specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 96.4% to 99.1%). In 24 of 458 cases (5.2% [95% CI 3.4% to 7.7%]) where a urinalysis was obtained, its results may have changed management of the patient. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of patients who present to the ED with scrotal pain is primarily driven by the ultrasound results. While the urinalysis may occasionally provide some benefit in the evaluation of patients with suspected epididymo-orchitis, the reflexive ordering of a urinalysis in patients with scrotal pain may be unnecessary. Dove 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7081061/ /pubmed/32214857 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S234413 Text en © 2020 Zitek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zitek, Tony
Ahmed, Omar
Lim, Chee
Carodine, Rianda
Martin, Kent
Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title_full Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title_short Assessing the Utility of Ultrasound and Urinalysis for Patients with Possible Epididymo-Orchitis – A Retrospective Study
title_sort assessing the utility of ultrasound and urinalysis for patients with possible epididymo-orchitis – a retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214857
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S234413
work_keys_str_mv AT zitektony assessingtheutilityofultrasoundandurinalysisforpatientswithpossibleepididymoorchitisaretrospectivestudy
AT ahmedomar assessingtheutilityofultrasoundandurinalysisforpatientswithpossibleepididymoorchitisaretrospectivestudy
AT limchee assessingtheutilityofultrasoundandurinalysisforpatientswithpossibleepididymoorchitisaretrospectivestudy
AT carodinerianda assessingtheutilityofultrasoundandurinalysisforpatientswithpossibleepididymoorchitisaretrospectivestudy
AT martinkent assessingtheutilityofultrasoundandurinalysisforpatientswithpossibleepididymoorchitisaretrospectivestudy