Cargando…

Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of stationary tissue background phase correction for affecting precision in the measurement of Qp/Qs by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We enrolled consecutive patients (n = 91) referred for CMR at 1.5T without suspicion of cardiac shunt, and patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickander, Jannike, Lundin, Magnus, Abdula, Goran, Jenner, Jonas, Maret, Eva, Sörensson, Peder, Heiberg, Einar, Sigfridsson, Andreas, Ugander, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61812-7
_version_ 1783508124887416832
author Nickander, Jannike
Lundin, Magnus
Abdula, Goran
Jenner, Jonas
Maret, Eva
Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Ugander, Martin
author_facet Nickander, Jannike
Lundin, Magnus
Abdula, Goran
Jenner, Jonas
Maret, Eva
Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Ugander, Martin
author_sort Nickander, Jannike
collection PubMed
description We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of stationary tissue background phase correction for affecting precision in the measurement of Qp/Qs by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We enrolled consecutive patients (n = 91) referred for CMR at 1.5T without suspicion of cardiac shunt, and patients (n = 10) with verified cardiac shunts in this retrospective study. All patients underwent phase contrast flow quantification in the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk. Flow was quantified using two semi-automatic software platforms (SyngoVia VA30, Vendor 1; Segment 2.0R4534, Vendor 2). Measurements were performed both uncorrected and corrected for linear (Vendor 1 and Vendor 2) or quadratic (Vendor 2) background phase. The proportion of patients outside the normal range of Qp/Qs was compared using the McNemar’s test. Compared to uncorrected measurements, there were fewer patients with a Qp/Qs outside the normal range following linear correction using Vendor 1 (10% vs 18%, p < 0.001), and Vendor 2 (10% vs 18%, p < 0.001), and following quadratic correction using Vendor 2 (7% vs 18%, p < 0.001). No patient with known shunt was reclassified as normal following stationary background correction. Therefore, we conclude that stationary tissue background correction reduces the number of patients with a Qp/Qs ratio outside the normal range in a consecutive clinical population, while simultaneously not reclassifying any patient with known cardiac shunts as having a normal Qp/Qs. Stationary tissue background correction may be used in clinical patients to increase diagnostic precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7081189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70811892020-03-23 Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance Nickander, Jannike Lundin, Magnus Abdula, Goran Jenner, Jonas Maret, Eva Sörensson, Peder Heiberg, Einar Sigfridsson, Andreas Ugander, Martin Sci Rep Article We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of stationary tissue background phase correction for affecting precision in the measurement of Qp/Qs by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We enrolled consecutive patients (n = 91) referred for CMR at 1.5T without suspicion of cardiac shunt, and patients (n = 10) with verified cardiac shunts in this retrospective study. All patients underwent phase contrast flow quantification in the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk. Flow was quantified using two semi-automatic software platforms (SyngoVia VA30, Vendor 1; Segment 2.0R4534, Vendor 2). Measurements were performed both uncorrected and corrected for linear (Vendor 1 and Vendor 2) or quadratic (Vendor 2) background phase. The proportion of patients outside the normal range of Qp/Qs was compared using the McNemar’s test. Compared to uncorrected measurements, there were fewer patients with a Qp/Qs outside the normal range following linear correction using Vendor 1 (10% vs 18%, p < 0.001), and Vendor 2 (10% vs 18%, p < 0.001), and following quadratic correction using Vendor 2 (7% vs 18%, p < 0.001). No patient with known shunt was reclassified as normal following stationary background correction. Therefore, we conclude that stationary tissue background correction reduces the number of patients with a Qp/Qs ratio outside the normal range in a consecutive clinical population, while simultaneously not reclassifying any patient with known cardiac shunts as having a normal Qp/Qs. Stationary tissue background correction may be used in clinical patients to increase diagnostic precision. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7081189/ /pubmed/32193468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61812-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nickander, Jannike
Lundin, Magnus
Abdula, Goran
Jenner, Jonas
Maret, Eva
Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Sigfridsson, Andreas
Ugander, Martin
Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort stationary tissue background correction increases the precision of clinical evaluation of intra-cardiac shunts by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61812-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nickanderjannike stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT lundinmagnus stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT abdulagoran stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT jennerjonas stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT mareteva stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT sorenssonpeder stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT heibergeinar stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT sigfridssonandreas stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT ugandermartin stationarytissuebackgroundcorrectionincreasestheprecisionofclinicalevaluationofintracardiacshuntsbycardiovascularmagneticresonance