Cargando…
Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study
BACKGROUND: Candidemia is an opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized both inside and outside intensive care units (ICUs). Identification of patients at risk is crucial to ensure prompt antifungal therapy. We sought to assess risk factors for cand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2766-1 |
_version_ | 1783508184498962432 |
---|---|
author | Poissy, Julien Damonti, Lauro Bignon, Anne Khanna, Nina Von Kietzell, Matthias Boggian, Katia Neofytos, Dionysios Vuotto, Fanny Coiteux, Valérie Artru, Florent Zimmerli, Stephan Pagani, Jean-Luc Calandra, Thierry Sendid, Boualem Poulain, Daniel van Delden, Christian Lamoth, Frédéric Marchetti, Oscar Bochud, Pierre-Yves |
author_facet | Poissy, Julien Damonti, Lauro Bignon, Anne Khanna, Nina Von Kietzell, Matthias Boggian, Katia Neofytos, Dionysios Vuotto, Fanny Coiteux, Valérie Artru, Florent Zimmerli, Stephan Pagani, Jean-Luc Calandra, Thierry Sendid, Boualem Poulain, Daniel van Delden, Christian Lamoth, Frédéric Marchetti, Oscar Bochud, Pierre-Yves |
author_sort | Poissy, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Candidemia is an opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized both inside and outside intensive care units (ICUs). Identification of patients at risk is crucial to ensure prompt antifungal therapy. We sought to assess risk factors for candidemia and death, both outside and inside ICUs. METHODS: This prospective multicenter matched case-control study involved six teaching hospitals in Switzerland and France. Cases were defined by positive blood cultures for Candida sp. Controls were matched to cases using the following criteria: age, hospitalization ward, hospitalization duration, and, when applicable, type of surgery. One to three controls were enrolled by case. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate conditional regression models, as a basis for a new scoring system to predict candidemia. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two candidemic patients and 411 matched controls were included. Forty-four percent of included patients were hospitalized in ICUs, and 56% were hospitalized outside ICUs. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the ICU population included total parenteral nutrition, acute kidney injury, heart disease, prior septic shock, and exposure to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the non-ICU population included central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, and exposure to glycopeptides and nitroimidazoles. The accuracy of the scores based on these risk factors is better in the ICU than in the non-ICU population. Independent risk factors for death in candidemic patients included septic shock, acute kidney injury, and the number of antibiotics to which patients were exposed before candidemia. DISCUSSION: While this study shows a role for known and novel risk factors for candidemia, it specifically highlights important differences in their distribution according to the hospital setting (ICU versus non-ICU). CONCLUSION: This study provides novel risk scores for candidemia accounting for the hospital setting and recent progress in patients’ management strategies and fungal epidemiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7081522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70815222020-03-23 Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study Poissy, Julien Damonti, Lauro Bignon, Anne Khanna, Nina Von Kietzell, Matthias Boggian, Katia Neofytos, Dionysios Vuotto, Fanny Coiteux, Valérie Artru, Florent Zimmerli, Stephan Pagani, Jean-Luc Calandra, Thierry Sendid, Boualem Poulain, Daniel van Delden, Christian Lamoth, Frédéric Marchetti, Oscar Bochud, Pierre-Yves Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Candidemia is an opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized both inside and outside intensive care units (ICUs). Identification of patients at risk is crucial to ensure prompt antifungal therapy. We sought to assess risk factors for candidemia and death, both outside and inside ICUs. METHODS: This prospective multicenter matched case-control study involved six teaching hospitals in Switzerland and France. Cases were defined by positive blood cultures for Candida sp. Controls were matched to cases using the following criteria: age, hospitalization ward, hospitalization duration, and, when applicable, type of surgery. One to three controls were enrolled by case. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate conditional regression models, as a basis for a new scoring system to predict candidemia. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two candidemic patients and 411 matched controls were included. Forty-four percent of included patients were hospitalized in ICUs, and 56% were hospitalized outside ICUs. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the ICU population included total parenteral nutrition, acute kidney injury, heart disease, prior septic shock, and exposure to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the non-ICU population included central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, and exposure to glycopeptides and nitroimidazoles. The accuracy of the scores based on these risk factors is better in the ICU than in the non-ICU population. Independent risk factors for death in candidemic patients included septic shock, acute kidney injury, and the number of antibiotics to which patients were exposed before candidemia. DISCUSSION: While this study shows a role for known and novel risk factors for candidemia, it specifically highlights important differences in their distribution according to the hospital setting (ICU versus non-ICU). CONCLUSION: This study provides novel risk scores for candidemia accounting for the hospital setting and recent progress in patients’ management strategies and fungal epidemiology. BioMed Central 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7081522/ /pubmed/32188500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2766-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Poissy, Julien Damonti, Lauro Bignon, Anne Khanna, Nina Von Kietzell, Matthias Boggian, Katia Neofytos, Dionysios Vuotto, Fanny Coiteux, Valérie Artru, Florent Zimmerli, Stephan Pagani, Jean-Luc Calandra, Thierry Sendid, Boualem Poulain, Daniel van Delden, Christian Lamoth, Frédéric Marchetti, Oscar Bochud, Pierre-Yves Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title | Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title_full | Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title_short | Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
title_sort | risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32188500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2766-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poissyjulien riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT damontilauro riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT bignonanne riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT khannanina riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT vonkietzellmatthias riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT boggiankatia riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT neofytosdionysios riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT vuottofanny riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT coiteuxvalerie riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT artruflorent riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT zimmerlistephan riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT paganijeanluc riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT calandrathierry riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT sendidboualem riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT poulaindaniel riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT vandeldenchristian riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT lamothfrederic riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT marchettioscar riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT bochudpierreyves riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy AT riskfactorsforcandidemiaaprospectivematchedcasecontrolstudy |