Cargando…
Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
BACKGROUND: Innovations in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy included in traditional comparative evaluations focus on sustained virologic response (SVR) without addressing challenges patients report beyond virologic cure. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV drug therapy with a pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00864-8 |
_version_ | 1783508214717874176 |
---|---|
author | Mattingly, T. Joseph Slejko, Julia F. Onukwugha, Eberechukwu Perfetto, Eleanor M. Kottilil, Shyamasundaran Mullins, C. Daniel |
author_facet | Mattingly, T. Joseph Slejko, Julia F. Onukwugha, Eberechukwu Perfetto, Eleanor M. Kottilil, Shyamasundaran Mullins, C. Daniel |
author_sort | Mattingly, T. Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Innovations in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy included in traditional comparative evaluations focus on sustained virologic response (SVR) without addressing challenges patients report beyond virologic cure. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV drug therapy with a patient-centered approach. METHODS: An individual-based Markov model was constructed using guidance from a stakeholder advisory board (SAB), a patient Delphi panel, and published literature to evaluate direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) compared to no treatment. The United States (US) health sector and societal perspectives were considered for 10- and 20-year time horizons. Inputs for treatment costs and effectiveness reflect a generic regimen. Indirect costs used for the societal model included estimates from self-reported productivity in a matched-control sample. Beyond the traditional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) health outcome, this study included two novel measures developed from the Delphi panel and SAB: infected life-years and workdays missed. All costs were measured in 2018 US dollars. RESULTS: Health sector costs and QALYs were higher in the treatment group in both 10- and 20-year models. Total infected life-years and workdays missed were reduced in the treatment group for both models. When costs of absenteeism, presenteeism, and patient/caregiver time were included, the DAA intervention was cost-saving at both 10 and 20 years. Health sector results were sensitive to drug costs and utility estimates for post-SVR health states. Societal results were sensitive to presenteeism estimates and drug costs. CONCLUSION: Treatment was cost-effective from a health sector perspective and cost-saving when including non-health costs such as patient/caregiver time and productivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-019-00864-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7081653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70816532020-03-23 Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Mattingly, T. Joseph Slejko, Julia F. Onukwugha, Eberechukwu Perfetto, Eleanor M. Kottilil, Shyamasundaran Mullins, C. Daniel Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Innovations in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy included in traditional comparative evaluations focus on sustained virologic response (SVR) without addressing challenges patients report beyond virologic cure. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV drug therapy with a patient-centered approach. METHODS: An individual-based Markov model was constructed using guidance from a stakeholder advisory board (SAB), a patient Delphi panel, and published literature to evaluate direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) compared to no treatment. The United States (US) health sector and societal perspectives were considered for 10- and 20-year time horizons. Inputs for treatment costs and effectiveness reflect a generic regimen. Indirect costs used for the societal model included estimates from self-reported productivity in a matched-control sample. Beyond the traditional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) health outcome, this study included two novel measures developed from the Delphi panel and SAB: infected life-years and workdays missed. All costs were measured in 2018 US dollars. RESULTS: Health sector costs and QALYs were higher in the treatment group in both 10- and 20-year models. Total infected life-years and workdays missed were reduced in the treatment group for both models. When costs of absenteeism, presenteeism, and patient/caregiver time were included, the DAA intervention was cost-saving at both 10 and 20 years. Health sector results were sensitive to drug costs and utility estimates for post-SVR health states. Societal results were sensitive to presenteeism estimates and drug costs. CONCLUSION: Treatment was cost-effective from a health sector perspective and cost-saving when including non-health costs such as patient/caregiver time and productivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-019-00864-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7081653/ /pubmed/31788751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00864-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Mattingly, T. Joseph Slejko, Julia F. Onukwugha, Eberechukwu Perfetto, Eleanor M. Kottilil, Shyamasundaran Mullins, C. Daniel Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title | Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full | Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_fullStr | Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_short | Value in Hepatitis C Virus Treatment: A Patient-Centered Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
title_sort | value in hepatitis c virus treatment: a patient-centered cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00864-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mattinglytjoseph valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis AT slejkojuliaf valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis AT onukwughaeberechukwu valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis AT perfettoeleanorm valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis AT kottililshyamasundaran valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mullinscdaniel valueinhepatitiscvirustreatmentapatientcenteredcosteffectivenessanalysis |