Cargando…
Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on the construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of generic preference-based measures (PBMs) used in East and South-East Asia. METHODS: This systematic review was guided by the COSMIN guideline. A literature sea...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31761995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w |
_version_ | 1783508214952755200 |
---|---|
author | Qian, Xinyu Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin Chuang, Ling-Hsiang Luo, Nan |
author_facet | Qian, Xinyu Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin Chuang, Ling-Hsiang Luo, Nan |
author_sort | Qian, Xinyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on the construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of generic preference-based measures (PBMs) used in East and South-East Asia. METHODS: This systematic review was guided by the COSMIN guideline. A literature search on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed databases up to August 2019 was conducted for measurement properties validation papers of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index (HUI), Quality of Well-Being (QWB), 15-Dimensional (15D) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL) in East and South-East Asian countries. Included papers were disaggregated into individual studies whose results and quality of design were rated separately. The population-specific measurement properties (construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness) of each PBM were assessed separately using relevant studies. The overall methodological quality of the studies used in each of the assessments was also rated. RESULTS: A total of 79 papers containing 1504 studies were included in this systematic review. The methodological quality was ‘very good’ or ‘adequate’ for the majority of the construct validity studies (99%) and responsiveness studies (61%), but for only a small portion of the test-retest reliability studies (23%). EQ-5D was most widely assessed and was found to have ‘sufficient’ construct validity and responsiveness in many populations, while the SF-6D and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) exhibited ‘inconsistent’ construct validity in some populations. Scarce evidence was available on HUI and QWB, but current evidence supported the use of HUI. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of the quality of existing generic PBMs in Asian populations. The current evidence supports the use of EQ-5D as the preferred choice when a generic PBM is needed, and continuous testing of all PBMs in the region. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7081654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70816542020-03-23 Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review Qian, Xinyu Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin Chuang, Ling-Hsiang Luo, Nan Pharmacoeconomics Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on the construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness of generic preference-based measures (PBMs) used in East and South-East Asia. METHODS: This systematic review was guided by the COSMIN guideline. A literature search on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed databases up to August 2019 was conducted for measurement properties validation papers of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index (HUI), Quality of Well-Being (QWB), 15-Dimensional (15D) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL) in East and South-East Asian countries. Included papers were disaggregated into individual studies whose results and quality of design were rated separately. The population-specific measurement properties (construct validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness) of each PBM were assessed separately using relevant studies. The overall methodological quality of the studies used in each of the assessments was also rated. RESULTS: A total of 79 papers containing 1504 studies were included in this systematic review. The methodological quality was ‘very good’ or ‘adequate’ for the majority of the construct validity studies (99%) and responsiveness studies (61%), but for only a small portion of the test-retest reliability studies (23%). EQ-5D was most widely assessed and was found to have ‘sufficient’ construct validity and responsiveness in many populations, while the SF-6D and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) exhibited ‘inconsistent’ construct validity in some populations. Scarce evidence was available on HUI and QWB, but current evidence supported the use of HUI. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a summary of the quality of existing generic PBMs in Asian populations. The current evidence supports the use of EQ-5D as the preferred choice when a generic PBM is needed, and continuous testing of all PBMs in the region. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7081654/ /pubmed/31761995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Qian, Xinyu Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin Chuang, Ling-Hsiang Luo, Nan Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title | Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | measurement properties of commonly used generic preference-based measures in east and south-east asia: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31761995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qianxinyu measurementpropertiesofcommonlyusedgenericpreferencebasedmeasuresineastandsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT tanrachelleeyin measurementpropertiesofcommonlyusedgenericpreferencebasedmeasuresineastandsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT chuanglinghsiang measurementpropertiesofcommonlyusedgenericpreferencebasedmeasuresineastandsoutheastasiaasystematicreview AT luonan measurementpropertiesofcommonlyusedgenericpreferencebasedmeasuresineastandsoutheastasiaasystematicreview |