Cargando…
Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the English version of the Itch Cognition Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic itch due to psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. An English-language version of an instrument assessing itch-related cognitions is needed since cognitions can con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32191772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230585 |
_version_ | 1783508271050522624 |
---|---|
author | Heckman, Carolyn J. Schut, Christina Riley, Mary Ehlers, Anke Valdes-Rodriguez, Rodrigo Kupfer, Jörg Gieler, Uwe Stapleton, Jerod L. |
author_facet | Heckman, Carolyn J. Schut, Christina Riley, Mary Ehlers, Anke Valdes-Rodriguez, Rodrigo Kupfer, Jörg Gieler, Uwe Stapleton, Jerod L. |
author_sort | Heckman, Carolyn J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the English version of the Itch Cognition Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic itch due to psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. An English-language version of an instrument assessing itch-related cognitions is needed since cognitions can contribute to a worsening of itch, and chronic itch is prevalent in English-speaking counties and internationally. METHODS: The German Itch Cognitions Questionnaire was translated into English, and cognitive interviewing was conducted to finalize item wording. Internal and test-retest reliability, item discrimination, responsiveness to change, and construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were assessed in a national sample of 137 individuals with chronic itch due to atopic dermatitis or psoriasis recruited online. RESULTS: Internal reliability was high with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.93 for the Catastrophizing subscale and 0.88–0.90 for Coping. The Pearson’s correlation assessing 1-month test-retest reliability for the Catastrophizing subscale was r = 0.62 and for the Coping subscale was r = 0.61. The corrected item-total correlation revealed that items were relatively consistent with the scores for the subscales (with correlations ranging from 0.58 to 0.79), indicating very good item discrimination. Results of factor analysis, convergent and discriminant, and responsiveness to change analyses provided evidence for validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed good psychometric characteristics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire. We suggest that future studies investigate the use of the measure in clinical practice to assist with treatment planning and outcome assessment related to itch as well as address study limitations such as sampling and replication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7081994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70819942020-03-24 Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire Heckman, Carolyn J. Schut, Christina Riley, Mary Ehlers, Anke Valdes-Rodriguez, Rodrigo Kupfer, Jörg Gieler, Uwe Stapleton, Jerod L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the English version of the Itch Cognition Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic itch due to psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. An English-language version of an instrument assessing itch-related cognitions is needed since cognitions can contribute to a worsening of itch, and chronic itch is prevalent in English-speaking counties and internationally. METHODS: The German Itch Cognitions Questionnaire was translated into English, and cognitive interviewing was conducted to finalize item wording. Internal and test-retest reliability, item discrimination, responsiveness to change, and construct, convergent, and discriminant validity were assessed in a national sample of 137 individuals with chronic itch due to atopic dermatitis or psoriasis recruited online. RESULTS: Internal reliability was high with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.93 for the Catastrophizing subscale and 0.88–0.90 for Coping. The Pearson’s correlation assessing 1-month test-retest reliability for the Catastrophizing subscale was r = 0.62 and for the Coping subscale was r = 0.61. The corrected item-total correlation revealed that items were relatively consistent with the scores for the subscales (with correlations ranging from 0.58 to 0.79), indicating very good item discrimination. Results of factor analysis, convergent and discriminant, and responsiveness to change analyses provided evidence for validity. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed good psychometric characteristics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire. We suggest that future studies investigate the use of the measure in clinical practice to assist with treatment planning and outcome assessment related to itch as well as address study limitations such as sampling and replication. Public Library of Science 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7081994/ /pubmed/32191772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230585 Text en © 2020 Heckman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heckman, Carolyn J. Schut, Christina Riley, Mary Ehlers, Anke Valdes-Rodriguez, Rodrigo Kupfer, Jörg Gieler, Uwe Stapleton, Jerod L. Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title | Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title_full | Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title_short | Development and psychometrics of the English version of the Itch Cognitions Questionnaire |
title_sort | development and psychometrics of the english version of the itch cognitions questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32191772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heckmancarolynj developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT schutchristina developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT rileymary developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT ehlersanke developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT valdesrodriguezrodrigo developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT kupferjorg developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT gieleruwe developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire AT stapletonjerodl developmentandpsychometricsoftheenglishversionoftheitchcognitionsquestionnaire |