Cargando…

Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry

Background: Mental health care professionals deal with complex ethical dilemmas that involve the principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Such dilemmas are even more prominent in forensic mental health care, where the restriction of personal rights is legitimated not only b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franke, Irina, Speiser, Oskar, Dudeck, Manuela, Streb, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00186
_version_ 1783508330342252544
author Franke, Irina
Speiser, Oskar
Dudeck, Manuela
Streb, Judith
author_facet Franke, Irina
Speiser, Oskar
Dudeck, Manuela
Streb, Judith
author_sort Franke, Irina
collection PubMed
description Background: Mental health care professionals deal with complex ethical dilemmas that involve the principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Such dilemmas are even more prominent in forensic mental health care, where the restriction of personal rights is legitimated not only by patient well-being but also by public safety interests. Little is known about either the use of formal ethics support services or specific ethical needs in forensic mental health care. Knowledge about the current structures and how they compare with those in general psychiatry would help to identify the most important ethical issues and to analyze whether there are unmet needs that might require specific ethics support. Methods: We performed a survey study in all general psychiatric and forensic psychiatric inpatient departments in Germany. The aims were to compare the availability and functioning of clinical ethics structures and to identify specific ethical needs in inpatient forensic and general mental health care. Results: Clinical ethics support was available in 74% of general psychiatric hospitals but in only 43% of all forensic psychiatric hospitals and 25% of those offering treatment for offenders with substance use disorders. Most ethics support services were interdisciplinary. The most frequently requested retrospective and prospective ethics consultations were on issues of omission and termination of treatment, coercive measures, and advance directives. Among the hospitals without access to ethics support, 71% indicated a need for training in ethics. Discussion: Our results show that ethics consultation is well established in general psychiatry, but less so in forensic psychiatry. Mental health care professionals in forensic psychiatry seem to have a need for ethics support and training in clinical ethics. We also found a difference in access to ethics structures between hospitals that treat mentally disordered offenders and those that treat offenders with substance use disorders. Further research should focus on how ethics support can be comprehensively implemented in forensic mental health care and how this might improve treatment quality and patient and staff well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7082354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70823542020-03-30 Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry Franke, Irina Speiser, Oskar Dudeck, Manuela Streb, Judith Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Mental health care professionals deal with complex ethical dilemmas that involve the principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Such dilemmas are even more prominent in forensic mental health care, where the restriction of personal rights is legitimated not only by patient well-being but also by public safety interests. Little is known about either the use of formal ethics support services or specific ethical needs in forensic mental health care. Knowledge about the current structures and how they compare with those in general psychiatry would help to identify the most important ethical issues and to analyze whether there are unmet needs that might require specific ethics support. Methods: We performed a survey study in all general psychiatric and forensic psychiatric inpatient departments in Germany. The aims were to compare the availability and functioning of clinical ethics structures and to identify specific ethical needs in inpatient forensic and general mental health care. Results: Clinical ethics support was available in 74% of general psychiatric hospitals but in only 43% of all forensic psychiatric hospitals and 25% of those offering treatment for offenders with substance use disorders. Most ethics support services were interdisciplinary. The most frequently requested retrospective and prospective ethics consultations were on issues of omission and termination of treatment, coercive measures, and advance directives. Among the hospitals without access to ethics support, 71% indicated a need for training in ethics. Discussion: Our results show that ethics consultation is well established in general psychiatry, but less so in forensic psychiatry. Mental health care professionals in forensic psychiatry seem to have a need for ethics support and training in clinical ethics. We also found a difference in access to ethics structures between hospitals that treat mentally disordered offenders and those that treat offenders with substance use disorders. Further research should focus on how ethics support can be comprehensively implemented in forensic mental health care and how this might improve treatment quality and patient and staff well-being. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7082354/ /pubmed/32231602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00186 Text en Copyright © 2020 Franke, Speiser, Dudeck and Streb. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Franke, Irina
Speiser, Oskar
Dudeck, Manuela
Streb, Judith
Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title_full Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title_fullStr Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title_short Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry
title_sort clinical ethics support services are not as well-established in forensic psychiatry as in general psychiatry
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00186
work_keys_str_mv AT frankeirina clinicalethicssupportservicesarenotaswellestablishedinforensicpsychiatryasingeneralpsychiatry
AT speiseroskar clinicalethicssupportservicesarenotaswellestablishedinforensicpsychiatryasingeneralpsychiatry
AT dudeckmanuela clinicalethicssupportservicesarenotaswellestablishedinforensicpsychiatryasingeneralpsychiatry
AT strebjudith clinicalethicssupportservicesarenotaswellestablishedinforensicpsychiatryasingeneralpsychiatry