Cargando…

Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection

INTRODUCTION: Urine sampling is an interesting solution for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection. Urine can be separated in different fractions: full void urine, urine sediment and urine supernatant. We aimed to determine which urine fraction is most competent for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Helder, Rianne, van Trommel, Nienke E., van Splunter, Annina P., Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., Bleeker, Maaike C.G., Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100193
_version_ 1783508382638931968
author van den Helder, Rianne
van Trommel, Nienke E.
van Splunter, Annina P.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Bleeker, Maaike C.G.
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
author_facet van den Helder, Rianne
van Trommel, Nienke E.
van Splunter, Annina P.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Bleeker, Maaike C.G.
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
author_sort van den Helder, Rianne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Urine sampling is an interesting solution for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection. Urine can be separated in different fractions: full void urine, urine sediment and urine supernatant. We aimed to determine which urine fraction is most competent for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection by methylation analysis. METHODS: Urine samples (27 controls, 30 CIN3 and 17 cervical cancer) were processed into 3 fractions and tested for 5 methylation markers (ASCL1, GHSR, LHX8, SST, ZIC1). We determined Spearman correlation coefficients between fractions, compared methylation levels and calculated AUCs for CIN3 and cancer detection. RESULTS: In general strong correlations (r > 0.60) were found between urine fractions. Methylation levels increased significantly with severity of underlying disease in all urine fractions. CIN3 and controls differed significantly for 2 markers in full void urine, 4 markers in urine sediment and 1 marker in urine supernatant, with AUCs of 0.55–0.79. Comparison of cancer to controls was highly significant for all markers in all fractions, yielding AUCs of 0.87–0.99. CONCLUSION: Methylation analysis performs excellent in all urine fractions for cervical cancer detection. Our results indicate the potential of CIN3 detection by urinary methylation analysis, and demonstrate that urine sediment performs best to detect CIN3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7082622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70826222020-03-24 Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection van den Helder, Rianne van Trommel, Nienke E. van Splunter, Annina P. Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Bleeker, Maaike C.G. Steenbergen, Renske D.M. Papillomavirus Res Article INTRODUCTION: Urine sampling is an interesting solution for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection. Urine can be separated in different fractions: full void urine, urine sediment and urine supernatant. We aimed to determine which urine fraction is most competent for CIN3 and cervical cancer detection by methylation analysis. METHODS: Urine samples (27 controls, 30 CIN3 and 17 cervical cancer) were processed into 3 fractions and tested for 5 methylation markers (ASCL1, GHSR, LHX8, SST, ZIC1). We determined Spearman correlation coefficients between fractions, compared methylation levels and calculated AUCs for CIN3 and cancer detection. RESULTS: In general strong correlations (r > 0.60) were found between urine fractions. Methylation levels increased significantly with severity of underlying disease in all urine fractions. CIN3 and controls differed significantly for 2 markers in full void urine, 4 markers in urine sediment and 1 marker in urine supernatant, with AUCs of 0.55–0.79. Comparison of cancer to controls was highly significant for all markers in all fractions, yielding AUCs of 0.87–0.99. CONCLUSION: Methylation analysis performs excellent in all urine fractions for cervical cancer detection. Our results indicate the potential of CIN3 detection by urinary methylation analysis, and demonstrate that urine sediment performs best to detect CIN3. Elsevier 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7082622/ /pubmed/32171935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100193 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van den Helder, Rianne
van Trommel, Nienke E.
van Splunter, Annina P.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Bleeker, Maaike C.G.
Steenbergen, Renske D.M.
Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title_full Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title_fullStr Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title_short Methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal CIN3 and cervical cancer detection
title_sort methylation analysis in urine fractions for optimal cin3 and cervical cancer detection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100193
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenhelderrianne methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection
AT vantrommelnienkee methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection
AT vansplunteranninap methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection
AT bleekermaaikecg methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection
AT steenbergenrenskedm methylationanalysisinurinefractionsforoptimalcin3andcervicalcancerdetection